First evaluation of the feasibility of MLC tracking using ultrasound motion estimation.

PURPOSE To quantify the performance of the Clarity ultrasound (US) imaging system (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) for real-time dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking. METHODS The Clarity calibration and quality assurance phantom was mounted on a motion platform moving with a periodic sine wave trajectory. The detected position of a 30 mm hypoechogenic sphere within the phantom was continuously reported via Clarity's real-time streaming interface to an in-house tracking and delivery software and subsequently used to adapt the MLC aperture. A portal imager measured MV treatment field/MLC apertures and motion platform positions throughout each experiment to independently quantify system latency and geometric error. Based on the measured range of latency values, a prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivery was performed with three realistic motion trajectories. The dosimetric impact of system latency on MLC tracking was directly measured using a 3D dosimeter mounted on the motion platform. RESULTS For 2D US imaging, the overall system latency, including all delay times from the imaging and delivery chain, ranged from 392 to 424 ms depending on the lateral sector size. For 3D US imaging, the latency ranged from 566 to 1031 ms depending on the elevational sweep. The latency-corrected geometric root-mean squared error was below 0.75 mm (2D US) and below 1.75 mm (3D US). For the prostate SBRT delivery, the impact of a range of system latencies (400-1000 ms) on the MLC tracking performance was minimal in terms of gamma failure rate. CONCLUSIONS Real-time MLC tracking based on a noninvasive US input is technologically feasible. Current system latencies are higher than those for x-ray imaging systems, but US can provide full volumetric image data and the impact of system latency was measured to be small for a prostate SBRT case when using a US-like motion input.

[1]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Effect of MLC tracking latency on conformal volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans in 4D stereotactic lung treatment , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Jeffrey C Bamber,et al.  The effect of object speed and direction on the performance of 3D speckle tracking using a 3D swept-volume ultrasound probe. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[4]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Multileaf Collimator Tracking Improves Dose Delivery for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Results of the First Clinical Trial. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  S Nill,et al.  Assessment of MLC tracking performance during hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy using real-time dose reconstruction , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  N. Van As,et al.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2015, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[7]  Martin F Fast,et al.  Dynamic tumor tracking using the Elekta Agility MLC. , 2014, Medical physics.

[8]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[9]  Jeffrey C Bamber,et al.  4D ultrasound speckle tracking of intra-fraction prostate motion: a phantom-based comparison with x-ray fiducial tracking using CyberKnife , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Detailed analysis of latencies in image-based dynamic MLC trackinga). , 2010, Medical physics.

[11]  S Nill,et al.  The comparative performance of four respiratory motion predictors for real-time tumour tracking , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  P. Evans,et al.  In vivo liver tracking with a high volume rate 4D ultrasound scanner and a 2D matrix array probe , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Xinhui Yang,et al.  Tracking latency in image-based dynamic MLC tracking with direct image access , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[14]  M. Lachaine,et al.  INTRAFRACTIONAL PROSTATE MOTION MANAGEMENT WITH THE CLARITY AUTOSCAN SYSTEM , 2013 .

[15]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Detailed analysis of latencies in image-based dynamic MLC tracking. , 2010, Medical physics.

[16]  Zdenka Kuncic,et al.  Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring for prostate intensity modulated arc therapy: first clinical results. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S Webb,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the Agility MLC for motion-compensated VMAT delivery , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  James L Bedford,et al.  Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Davide Fontanarosa,et al.  Review of ultrasound image guidance in external beam radiotherapy part II: intra-fraction motion management and novel applications , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.