Importance of Reliable EEG Data in Motor Imagery Classification: Attention Level-based Approach

Brain-computer interface (BCI) has been widely used to predict the intention of users in motor imagery-based (MI-based) task. Although the overall MI classification accuracy has been largely enhanced from previous efforts, applying MI-BCI to the so-called BCI-illiterate subjects remains as an unsolved problem. This study proposed a physiological approach for improving MI-BCI performance, by measuring the baseline attention level estimated by coefficient F from the electroencephalogram (EEG) band-activities. In this endeavor, a total of 9 MI-EEG recordings were retrieved from an open BCI dataset. A measure of attention level was calculated for each trial to select high attention trials. High attention trial-based machine learning model showed higher MI classification performance (median accuracy = 62.50% (interquartile range (IQR) = 55.21 - 82.29%)) than the conventional approach (median accuracy = 57.64% (IQR = 54.17 - 62.50%)) with statistical significance (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.037). This study found that machine learning models trained from high attention trials yield improved classification accuracy to the models derived from total trial regardless of both BCI illiterate and literate.

[1]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  The predictive role of pre-cue EEG rhythms on MI-based BCI classification performance , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Effects of mental fatigue on attention: an ERP study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  R. Leeb,et al.  BCI Competition 2008 { Graz data set B , 2008 .

[5]  Ji-Hoon Jeong,et al.  Recurrent convolutional neural network model based on temporal and spatial feature for motor imagery classification , 2019, 2019 7th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

[6]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Structural and functional correlates of motor imagery BCI performance: Insights from the patterns of fronto-parietal attention network , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Towards a Cure for BCI Illiteracy , 2009, Brain Topography.

[8]  Ji-Hoon Jeong,et al.  Exploring the Number of Repetitions in Trials for the Performance Convergence of Classification in Motor Imagery Task with Hand-Grasping , 2019, 2019 7th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

[9]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[10]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Estimating Noise and Dimensionality in BCI Data Sets : Towards Illiteracy Comprehension , 2008 .

[11]  Yunsik Son,et al.  Classification of computed tomography scanner manufacturer using support vector machine , 2017, 2017 5th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

[12]  M. Hallett,et al.  A high performance sensorimotor beta rhythm-based brain–computer interface associated with human natural motor behavior , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  Empathy, motivation, and P300 BCI performance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Seong-Whan Lee,et al.  Comparative analysis of features extracted from EEG spatial, spectral and temporal domains for binary and multiclass motor imagery classification , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  High Theta and Low Alpha Powers May Be Indicative of BCI-Illiteracy in Motor Imagery , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  V. Ibáñez,et al.  Frontal theta event-related synchronization: comparison of directed attention and working memory load effects , 2006, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[17]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Progress Beyond Communication and Control , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[18]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Predicting Mental Imagery-Based BCI Performance from Personality, Cognitive Profile and Neurophysiological Patterns , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke , 2015, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[20]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Support Vector Machine-Based Classification Scheme for Myoelectric Control Applied to Upper Limb , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  K. Müller,et al.  Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance , 2012, Biological Psychology.