neuroBi: A Highly Configurable Neurostimulator for a Retinal Prosthesis and Other Applications

To evaluate the efficacy of a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis, a highly configurable external neurostimulator is required. In order to meet functional and safety specifications, it was necessary to develop a custom device. A system is presented which can deliver charge-balanced, constant-current biphasic pulses, with widely adjustable parameters, to arbitrary configurations of output electrodes. This system is shown to be effective in eliciting visual percepts in a patient with approximately 20 years of light perception vision only due to retinitis pigmentosa, using an electrode array implanted in the suprachoroidal space of the eye. The flexibility of the system also makes it suitable for use in a number of other emerging clinical neurostimulation applications, including epileptic seizure suppression and closed-loop deep brain stimulation. Clinical trial registration number NCT01603576 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

[1]  Chet T Moritz,et al.  Neural Prostheses , 2014 .

[2]  H. Kishima,et al.  Testing of semichronically implanted retinal prosthesis by suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Visual prostheses for the blind. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  P. E. K. Donaldson,et al.  When are actively balanced biphasic (‘Lilly’) stimulating pulses necessary in a neurological prosthesis? I Historical background; Pt resting potential;Q studies , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  Andrew K. Wise,et al.  Chronic Electrical Stimulation with a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A Preclinical Safety and Efficacy Study , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Penelope J. Allen,et al.  Development of a surgical approach for a wide-view suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: evaluation of implantation trauma , 2012, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Virtual electrodes by current steering in retinal prostheses. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Psychophysics of a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis , 2013 .

[12]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  R.V. Shannon,et al.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  M. E. Kirlangic,et al.  External trial deep brain stimulation device for the application of desynchronizing stimulation techniques , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  B. L. Hart,et al.  D.C. matching errors in the Wilson current source , 1976 .

[17]  P. Peckham,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  Sam E John,et al.  An automated system for rapid evaluation of high-density electrode arrays in neural prostheses. , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Deep brain stimulation in neurologic disorders. , 2007, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[20]  Anthony N. Burkitt,et al.  Closed-Loop Seizure Control with Very High Frequency Electrical Stimulation at Seizure Onset in the Gaers Model of Absence Epilepsy , 2011, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[21]  J. R. Hughes,et al.  Brief, noninjurious electric waveform for stimulation of the brain. , 1955, Science.

[22]  Joel Villalobos,et al.  A wide-field suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis is stable and well tolerated following chronic implantation. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  G. Brindley,et al.  The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Spatially Patterned Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Resolution of Retinal Prostheses , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Takashi Fujikado,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of the feasibility of suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation for artificial vision in normal and RCS rats. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Comparison of electrically evoked cortical potential thresholds generated with subretinal or suprachoroidal placement of a microelectrode array in the rabbit , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Nicholas L Opie,et al.  Development of a surgical procedure for implantation of a prototype suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis , 2014, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[30]  C. L. Doren,et al.  A high voltage, constant current stimulator for electrocutaneous stimulation through small electrodes , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  神田 寛行 Electrophysiological studies of the feasibility of suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation for artificial vision in normal and RCS rats , 2005 .

[33]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Visual cortex responses to single- and simultaneous multiple-electrode stimulation of the retina: implications for retinal prostheses. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  G. J. Suaning,et al.  Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array , 2009, Vision Research.

[35]  A. Burkitt,et al.  Electrical probing of cortical excitability in patients with epilepsy , 2011, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[36]  Liming Li,et al.  Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits , 2009, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[37]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Visual cortex responses to suprachoroidal electrical stimulation of the retina: effects of electrode return configuration. , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[38]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  A. Burkitt,et al.  Exploring the tolerability of spatiotemporally complex electrical stimulation paradigms , 2011, Epilepsy Research.

[40]  J. Wouters,et al.  Asymmetric Pulses in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Pulse Shape, Polarity, and Rate , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[41]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of stimulus parameters and electrode geometry for an effective suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[42]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Suprachoroidal electrical stimulation: effects of stimulus pulse parameters on visual cortical responses , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.