Explicit analytical tuning rules for digital PID controllers via the magnitude optimum criterion.

Analytical tuning rules for digital PID type-I controllers are presented regardless of the process complexity. This explicit solution allows control engineers 1) to make an accurate examination of the effect of the controller's sampling time to the control loop's performance both in the time and frequency domain 2) to decide when the control has to be I, PI and when the derivative, D, term has to be added or omitted 3) apply this control action to a series of stable benchmark processes regardless of their complexity. The former advantages are considered critical in industry applications, since 1) most of the times the choice of the digital controller's sampling time is based on heuristics and past criteria, 2) there is little a-priori knowledge of the controlled process making the choice of the type of the controller a trial and error exercise 3) model parameters change often depending on the control loop's operating point making in this way, the problem of retuning the controller's parameter a much challenging issue. Basis of the proposed control law is the principle of the PID tuning via the Magnitude Optimum criterion. The final control law involves the controller's sampling time Ts within the explicit solution of the controller's parameters. Finally, the potential of the proposed method is justified by comparing its performance with the conventional PID tuning when controlling the same process. Further investigation regarding the choice of the controller's sampling time Ts is also presented and useful conclusions for control engineers are derived.

[1]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  The future of PID control , 2000 .

[2]  Aidan O'Dwyer,et al.  Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules , 2003 .

[3]  Nikolaos I. Margaris,et al.  Explicit Analytical PID Tuning Rules for the Design of Type-III Control Loops , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Amin Khodabakhshian,et al.  A new robust PID load frequency controller , 2008 .

[5]  Jan Cvejn,et al.  The design of PID controller for non-oscillating time-delayed plants with guaranteed stability margin based on the modulus optimum criterion , 2013 .

[6]  Nikolaos I. Margaris,et al.  Revisiting the Magnitude Optimum criterion for robust tuning of PID type-I control loops , 2012 .

[7]  M. Saeedifard,et al.  Neuro-Computing Vector Classification SVM Schemes to Integrate the Overmodulation Region in Neutral Point Clamped (NPC) Converters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Torque Control—Part II: Implementation and Experimental Evaluation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Stanko Strmcnik,et al.  Improving disturbance rejection of PI controllers by means of the magnitude optimum method. , 2004, ISA transactions.

[10]  R. C. Oldenbourg,et al.  A Uniform Approach to the Optimum Adjustment of Control Loops , 1954 .

[11]  Yun Li,et al.  PID control system analysis, design, and technology , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[12]  Marco Liserre,et al.  Filter-Based Active Damping of Voltage Source Converters With $LCL$ Filter , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  J. B. Gomm,et al.  Solution to the Shell standard control problem using genetically tuned PID controllers , 2002 .

[14]  K. Papadopoulos,et al.  Extending the Symmetrical Optimum criterion to the design of PID type-p control loops , 2012 .

[15]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning , 1995 .

[16]  Stanko Strmcnik,et al.  A magnitude optimum multiple integration tuning method for filtered PID controller , 2001, Autom..

[17]  I. Kioskeridis,et al.  Thermal and slip effects on rotor time constant in vector controlled induction motor drives , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[18]  Konstantinos G. Papadopoulos,et al.  PID Controller Tuning Using the Magnitude Optimum Criterion , 2014 .

[19]  Ali Emadi,et al.  Active Damping in DC/DC Power Electronic Converters: A Novel Method to Overcome the Problems of Constant Power Loads , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  G. Joos,et al.  Incorporating the overmodulation range in space vector pattern generators using a classification alg , 1997 .

[21]  M. Safiuddin,et al.  Magnitude and symmetric optimum criterion for the design of linear control systems-what is it and does it compare with the others? , 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[22]  Steffan Hansen,et al.  Investigation of Active Damping Approaches for PI-Based Current Control of Grid-Connected Pulse Width Modulation Converters With LCL Filters , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[23]  Arun Ghosh,et al.  Design and implementation of a 2-DOF PID compensation for magnetic levitation systems. , 2014, ISA transactions.

[24]  Bin Wu,et al.  An Active Damping Method Using Inductor-Current Feedback Control for High-Power PWM Current-Source Rectifier , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[25]  Dong-Choon Lee,et al.  A novel overmodulation technique for space vector PWM inverters , 1997 .

[26]  S. Daley,et al.  Optimal-Tuning PID Control for Industrial Systems , 2000 .

[27]  Russel J. Kerkman,et al.  Operation of PWM voltage source-inverters in the overmodulation region , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..