How do crop types influence breeding success in lesser kestrels through prey quality and availability? A modelling approach

Summary 1 In the middle of the 20th century the colonial lesser kestrel Falco naumanni experienced a marked decline in its western palaearctic breeding range. Although this decline has been attributed to changes in land use influencing breeding success through lowering the abundance and quality of prey, a quantification of these effects has not yet been undertaken. 2 To study how these two key factors influence breeding success, we developed an individual-based model, which translates the hunting performance of each adult foraging trip into nestling growth and enables the effect of crop types on the breeding success of the lesser kestrel to be quantified. Both the authors’ own field data and published inferential and experimental studies were used to parameterize and validate the growth model. 3 Model results demonstrated that adult provisioning rates provide very little information on the relation between prey availability and breeding success. 4 On the other hand, the model indicated that small differences in prey abundance among crop types cause large differences in breeding success, highlighting the importance of crop composition in the vicinity of lesser kestrel colonies. 5 Mean prey biomass is an even more important influence on breeding success. Our results indicated a minimum mean prey size of 0·6 g, below which colonies become population sinks. 6 Synthesis and applications. We developed an individual-based model that simulates the growth in body mass of a lesser kestrel brood as a function of prey abundance and prey size. These two key factors define a parameter space in which the conservation status of breeding colonies can be evaluated. We applied the model to six lesser kestrel breeding colonies with different mean prey size and different agricultural land use influencing prey abundance. Our model suggests that the habitat quality of two of these colonies is sufficient for population persistence, while management actions to increase habitat quality are required in the remaining four colonies. An increase in the availability of prey-rich habitats such as field margins would achieve this goal without imposing too great a cost on the local farming community.

[1]  I. Burfield,et al.  Birds in Europe : population estimates, trends and conservation status , 2004 .

[2]  S. Toft,et al.  Importance of insect prey quality for grey partridge chicks Perdix perdix: a self‐selection experiment , 2000 .

[3]  J. Aparicio Costs and benefits of surplus offspring in the lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni ) , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  N. Manceau,et al.  Régime et comportement alimentaires du faucon crécerellette Falco naumanni en crau en période prénuptiale , 1999 .

[5]  Karin Johst,et al.  FORAGING IN A PATCHY AND DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE: HUMAN LAND USE AND THE WHITE STORK , 2001 .

[6]  J. Tella,et al.  Traditional farming and key foraging habitats for chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax conservation in a Spanish pseudosteppe landscape , 1998 .

[7]  R. Johnston Effects of diet quality on the nestling growth of a wild insectivorous passerine, the house martin Delichon urbica , 1993 .

[8]  Maarten Bijleveld,et al.  Birds of Prey in Europe , 1974 .

[9]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  PATTERNS OF GROWTH IN BIRDS , 2008 .

[10]  S. Wotton,et al.  Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK , 2001 .

[11]  S. Ormerod,et al.  Meeting the ecological challenges of agricultural change: editors' introduction , 2003 .

[12]  D. Smallshire,et al.  Agri‐environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England , 2008 .

[13]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Editors' Introduction: Birds and Agriculture , 2000 .

[14]  Y. Leshem,et al.  Causes of population declines of the Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni in Israel , 2003 .

[15]  V. Brown,et al.  Influence of agricultural management, sward structure and food resources on grassland field use, by birds in lowland England , 2005 .

[16]  J. Tella,et al.  Does land irrigation actually reduce foraging habitat for breeding lesser kestrels? The role of crop types , 2005 .

[17]  K. Hibbard,et al.  INFLUENCE OF REDUCED FOOD AVAILABILITY ON GROWTH OF CAPTIVE AMERICAN KESTRELS , 1994 .

[18]  F. Ortega,et al.  Recent changes in landscape structure and function in a mediterranean region of SW Spain (1950–1984) , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Modelling the foraging habitat selection of lesser kestrels: conservation implications of European Agricultural Policies , 2004 .

[20]  P. Gaona,et al.  A demographic model for a population of the endangered lesser kestrel in southern Spain , 1996 .

[21]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  A Graphical Method of Fitting Equations to Growth Curves , 1967 .

[22]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  The benefits of extensive agriculture to birds: the case of the little bustard , 2001 .

[23]  J. Donázar,et al.  Foraging habitat selection, land-use changes and population decline in the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni , 1993 .

[24]  J. Donázar,et al.  Non-adaptive adoptions of nestlings in the colonial lesser kestrel: proximate causes and fitness consequences , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  E. Bignal,et al.  Applying the results of ecological studies to land‐use policies and practices , 2008 .

[26]  R. Green,et al.  Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  D. Harper,et al.  Effects of agricultural intensification on the breeding success of corn buntings Miliaria calandra , 2000 .

[28]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures , 2002 .

[29]  J. M. Holland,et al.  Farm‐scale spatiotemporal dynamics of predatory beetles in arable crops , 2005 .

[30]  J. Tella,et al.  Proximate causes and fitness consequences of hatching failure in lesser kestrels Falco naumanni , 2005 .

[31]  J. Donázar,et al.  Organochlorine and heavy metal contamination in non-viable eggs and its relation to breeding success in a Spanish population of Lesser Kestrels (Falco naumanni). , 1993, Environmental pollution.

[32]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[33]  Deborah J. Pain,et al.  The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe's farmland birds , 2002 .

[34]  Javier Bustamante,et al.  The effect of weather on lesser kestrel breeding success: can climate change explain historical population declines? , 2003 .

[35]  J. Donázar,et al.  Conflicts between Lesser Kestrel Conservation and European Agricultural Policies as Identif ied by Habitat Use Analyses , 1998 .

[36]  D. Bird,et al.  Effects of Short-Term Food Deprivation on Growth of Hand-Reared American Kestrels , 1994 .

[37]  T. Benton,et al.  Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? , 2003 .

[38]  A. Foucart,et al.  Régime et comportement alimentaires du faucon crécerellette Falco naumanni en crau en période de reproduction et post-reproduction , 2000 .