Anarchic manufacturing: Distributed control for product transition

Abstract Manufacturers are poorly equipped to manage product transition scenarios, when moving from one product to another. Most tools consider a mature system, yet during transition and ramp up disturbances and inefficiency are common. The traditional methods, using centralised planning and control structures are too rigid and often resort to simple dispatch heuristics in this highly dynamic environment. Distributed systems have been proposed to leverage their self-organising and flexible traits to manage highly volatile and complex scenarios. Anarchic manufacturing, a free market based distributed planning and control system, delegates decision-making authority and autonomy to system elements at the lowest level; this system has previously been shown to manage job and flowshop style problems. The system has been adapted to use a dynamic batching mechanism, where jobs cooperate to benefit from economies of scale. The batch enables a direct economic viability assessment within the free market architecture, whether an individual machine should changeover production to another product type. This profitability assessment considers the overall system state and an agent’s individual circumstance, which in turn reduces system myopia. Four experiments, including a real-world automotive case study, evaluate the anarchic manufacturing system against two centralised systems, using three different ramp-up curves. Although not always best performing against centralised systems, the anarchic manufacturing system is shown to manage transition scenarios effectively, displaying self-organising and flexible characteristics. The hierarchical system was shown to be impeded by its simplifying structure, as a result of structural rigidity.

[1]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Solution Principles for Managing Instabilities in Ramp-Up , 2014 .

[2]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  Real-time teaming of multiple reconfigurable manufacturing systems , 2018 .

[3]  Aydin Nassehi,et al.  Embracing complicatedness and complexity with Anarchic Manufacturing , 2019 .

[4]  Marco Macchi,et al.  A review on the characteristics of cyber-physical systems for the future smart factories , 2020, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[5]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Modeling of Manufacturing Technologies During Ramp-up☆ , 2016 .

[6]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  A New Framework to Evaluate the Process Capability of Production Technologies during Production Ramp-Up , 2014 .

[7]  Henrik Almgren,et al.  Pilot production and manufacturing start-up: The case of Volvo S80 , 2000 .

[8]  Klaus Reinholdt Nyhuus Hansen,et al.  Modelling ramp-up curves to reflect learning: improving capacity planning in secondary pharmaceutical production , 2015 .

[9]  Richard Cooney,et al.  Is “lean” a universal production system?: Batch production in the automotive industry , 2002 .

[10]  Soundar R. T. Kumara,et al.  Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing , 2016 .

[11]  Mark Versteyhe,et al.  Resource management in decentralized industrial Automated Guided Vehicle systems , 2020 .

[12]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Optimisation of the aggregation and execution rates for intersecting operation sets: an example of machining process design , 2020 .

[13]  Eric Blanco,et al.  A comparative study on production ramp-up: state-of-the-art and new challenges , 2014 .

[14]  Douglas H. Norrie,et al.  Agent-Based Systems for Intelligent Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1999, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[15]  Thomas Ditlev Brunoe,et al.  Prerequisites and Barriers for the Development of Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems for High Speed Ramp-up☆ , 2016 .

[16]  Marcus Frantze´n,et al.  A real-time simulation-based optimisation environment for industrial scheduling , 2013 .

[17]  Adar Kalir,et al.  A Full Factory Transient Simulation Model for the Analysis of Expected Performance in a Transition Period , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[18]  Per Hilletofth,et al.  Decision model for product rollover in manufacturing operations , 2017 .

[19]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems , 2010 .

[20]  Yi Xu,et al.  The copy-exactly ramp-up strategy: trading-off learning with process change , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[21]  John Miltenburg,et al.  U-shaped production lines: A review of theory and practice , 2001 .

[22]  C. Terwiesch,et al.  Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up , 1998 .

[23]  Raik Stolletz,et al.  Strategic ramp-up planning in automotive production networks , 2017 .

[24]  Sanja Petrovic,et al.  SURVEY OF DYNAMIC SCHEDULING IN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[25]  Achim Kampker,et al.  Increasing Ramp-up Performance By Implementing the Gamification Approach☆ , 2014 .

[26]  Vikas Manjrekar,et al.  Integrated yet distributed operations planning approach: A next generation manufacturing planning system , 2020 .

[27]  Jeonghan Ko,et al.  Design of multi-product manufacturing lines with the consideration of product change dependent inter-task times, reduced changeover and machine flexibility , 2010 .

[28]  Tullio Tolio,et al.  Production quality improvement during manufacturing systems ramp-up , 2018, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology.