SCREENING AND EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER: AN UPDATE

Abstract Screening for prostate cancer has become a main controversial topic. First the currently used screening tools, PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) and DRE (Digital Rectal Examination) have a low accuracy in the prediction of prostate cancer. Second, the benefit of screening in reducing the prostate cancer related mortality was not uniformly shown in older screening studies and there was concern about the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of insignificant prostate cancers. Very recently, 3 major prospective, randomized screening studies have been published. This paper aims to provide an overview how the performance of the current screening tools can be ameliorated and evaluates the recently published screening studies with practical considerations for future screening protocols.

[1]  P. Visschere,et al.  SCREENING AND EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER: AN UPDATE , 2012, Acta clinica Belgica.

[2]  Thomas Anil,et al.  Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors. , 2011, Urology.

[3]  A. Verbaeys,et al.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the assessment of high grade prostate carcinoma in patients with elevated PSA: a single-institution experience of 356 patients. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[4]  N. Lumen,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DIAGNOSIS, STAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING FOR PROSTATE CANCER , 2010, Acta clinica Belgica.

[5]  R. V. D. van den Bergh,et al.  Performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene and prostate-specific antigen in prescreened men: exploring the value of PCA3 for a first-line diagnostic test. , 2010, European urology.

[6]  Frederico Branco,et al.  Prostate cancer prevention trial and European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculators: a performance comparison in a contemporary screened cohort. , 2010, European urology.

[7]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[9]  G. De Meerleer,et al.  A qualitative approach to combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[10]  G. De Meerleer,et al.  Clinical and imaging tools in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, a review. , 2010, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[11]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  W. Ellis,et al.  Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. , 2009, European urology.

[14]  Dirk F Moore,et al.  Outcomes of localized prostate cancer following conservative management. , 2009, JAMA.

[15]  R. Nam,et al.  Indications and timing for prostate biopsy, diagnosis of early stage prostate cancer and its definitive treatment: a clinical conundrum in the PSA era. , 2009, Surgical oncology.

[16]  Y. Fradet Biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis: beyond prostate-specific antigen , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[17]  H. Lilja,et al.  Early prostate-specific antigen changes and the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[18]  Clare Allen,et al.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Andrew J Vickers,et al.  Systematic review of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen velocity and doubling time as predictors for prostate cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Mesut Remzi,et al.  Clinical utility of the PCA3 urine assay in European men scheduled for repeat biopsy. , 2008, European urology.

[21]  H. Klocker,et al.  Tyrol Prostate Cancer Demonstration Project: early detection, treatment, outcome, incidence and mortality , 2008, BJU international.

[22]  S. Shariat,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer in 2007: the PSA era and its challenges are not over. , 2008, European urology.

[23]  H Ballentine Carter,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer in 2007. Part 1: PSA and PSA kinetics. , 2008, European urology.

[24]  D Andrew Loblaw,et al.  Assessing individual risk for prostate cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Donna P. Ankerst,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[26]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  S. Loening,et al.  Re: Roddam AW, Duffy MJ, Hamdy FC, et al. Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA Level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2005;48:386-99. , 2005, European urology.

[28]  B. Dezső,et al.  The prevalence of prostate carcinoma and its precursor in Hungary: an autopsy study. , 2005, European urology.

[29]  Freddie C Hamdy,et al.  Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2005, European urology.

[30]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[31]  Ian M Thompson,et al.  Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. , 2005, JAMA.

[32]  M. Kattan,et al.  Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy based on patient age, digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[33]  James A Hanley,et al.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2005, JAMA.

[34]  O. Löfman,et al.  Clinical consequences of screening for prostate cancer: 15 years follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in Sweden. , 2004, European urology.

[35]  J. Crowley,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  F. Labrie,et al.  Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11‐year follow‐up of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial , 2004, The Prostate.

[37]  E. Varenhorst,et al.  Costs and effects of prostate cancer screening in SwedenA 15-year follow-up of a randomized trial , 2004, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[38]  A. Zlotta,et al.  Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[39]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[40]  S. Katusic,et al.  Decline in prostate cancer mortality from 1980 to 1997, and an update on incidence trends in Olmsted County, Minnesota. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[41]  I Mehdi,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[42]  M. Solomon,et al.  Age specific prostate specific antigen reference ranges: population specific. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[43]  M. J. Hoeksema,et al.  Cancer mortality rates fall: a turning point for the nation. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  J. Richie,et al.  Comparison of prostate specific antigen concentration versus prostate specific antigen density in the early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[45]  W. Catalona,et al.  Rate of change in serum prostate specific antigen levels as a method for prostate cancer detection. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[46]  M. Benson,et al.  Predictive value of prostate-specific antigen density for the presence of micrometastatic carcinoma of the prostate. , 1994, Urology.

[47]  C G Chute,et al.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. , 1993, JAMA.

[48]  E. Metter,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. , 1992, JAMA.

[49]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[50]  Thomas Wiegel,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. , 2011, European urology.

[51]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  A risk-based strategy improves prostate-specific antigen-driven detection of prostate cancer. , 2010, European urology.

[52]  P. Loehrer Assessing Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial , 2007 .