Empirical validation of SAR values predicted by FDTD modeling * †

Rapid increase in the use of numerical techniques to predict current density or specific absorption rate (SAR) in sophisticated three dimensional anatomical computer models of man and animals has resulted in the need to understand how numerical solutions of the complex electrodynamics equations match with empirical measurements. This aspect is particularly important because different numerical codes and computer models are used in research settings as a guide in designing clinical devices, telecommunication systems, and safety standards. To ensure compliance with safety guidelines during equipment design, manufacturing and maintenance, realistic and accurate models could be used as a bridge between empirical data and actual exposure conditions. Before these tools are transitioned into the hands of health safety officers and system designers, their accuracy and limitations must be verified under a variety of exposure conditions using available analytical and empirical dosimetry techniques. In this paper, empirical validation of SAR values predicted by finite difference time domain (FDTD) numerical code on sphere and rat is presented. The results of this study show a good agreement between empirical and theoretical methods and, thus, offer a relatively high confidence in SAR predictions obtained from digital anatomical models based on the FDTD numerical code.

[1]  Allen Taflove,et al.  A Novel Method to Analyze Electromagnetic Scattering of Complex Objects , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  O. Gandhi Polarization and frequency effects on whole animal absorption of RF energy , 1974 .

[3]  P. A. Mason,et al.  Recent Advancements in Dosimetry Measurements and Modeling , 2000 .

[4]  P. A. Mason,et al.  Database created from magnetic resonance images of a Sprague‐Dawley rat, rhesus monkey, and pigmy goat , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[5]  P. A. Mason,et al.  3-dimensional Models for EMF Dosimetry , 1999 .

[6]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Microwave radiation absorption in the rat: frequency-dependent SAR distribution in body and tail. , 1985, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  O P Gandhi,et al.  RF currents induced in an anatomically-based model of a human for plane-wave exposures (20-100 MHz). , 1989, Health physics.

[8]  O P Gandhi,et al.  Comparison of numerical and experimental methods for determination of SAR and radiation patterns of handheld wireless telephones. , 1999, Bioelectromagnetics.

[9]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Mobile communications safety , 1996 .

[10]  R. Luebbers,et al.  The Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electromagnetics , 1993 .

[11]  O P Gandhi,et al.  Numerical dosimetry at power-line frequencies using anatomically based models. , 1992, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Om P. Gandhi,et al.  Comparison of the FFT Conjugate Gradient Method and the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for the 2-D Absorption Problem , 1987 .

[14]  Francis A. Duck,et al.  Physical properties of tissue : a comprehensive reference book , 1990 .

[15]  J. L. Lords,et al.  Behavioral and thermal effects of microwave radiation at resonant and nonresonant wavelengths , 1977 .

[16]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Electromagnetic absorption in the human head from experimental 6-GHz handheld transceivers , 1995 .

[17]  O.P. Gandhi,et al.  Calculation of electric fields and currents induced in a millimeter-resolution human model at 60 Hz using the FDTD method with a novel time-to-frequency-domain conversion , 1996, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1996 Digest.

[18]  J. M. Padilla,et al.  Using Dewar-Flask Calorimetry and Rectal Temperatures to Determine the Specific Absorption Rates of Small Rodents , 1986 .

[19]  Cynthia Furse,et al.  Validation of the finite-difference time-domain method for near-field bioelectromagnetic simulations , 1997 .

[20]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Part-body and multibody effects on absorption of radio-frequency electromagnetic energy by animals and by models of man , 1979 .

[21]  Cynthia Furse,et al.  Improvements to the finite-difference time-domain method for calculating the radar cross section of a perfectly conducting target , 1990 .

[22]  A Comparison of Sar Values Determined Empirically and by FD-TD Modeling , 2000 .

[23]  K R Foster,et al.  Heating of tissues by microwaves: a model analysis. , 1998, Bioelectromagnetics.

[24]  R. Spiegel,et al.  Brain temperature measurements in rats: a comparison of microwave and ambient temperature exposures. , 1986, Bioelectromagnetics.

[25]  P. A. Mason,et al.  Regional brain heating during microwave exposure (2.06 GHz), warm-water immersion, environmental heating and exercise. , 1998, Bioelectromagnetics.

[26]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[27]  A. Guy,et al.  Formulas for preparing phantom muscle tissue at various radiofrequencies. , 1984, Bioelectromagnetics.

[28]  Earl L. Bell,et al.  MIE: A Fortran Program for Computing Power Deposition in Spherical Dielectrics through Application of MIE Theory. , 1977 .

[29]  E. C. Burdette,et al.  In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties at VHF through Microwave Frequencies , 1980 .

[30]  Om P. Gandhi,et al.  An expanding-grid algorithm for the finite-difference time-domain method (EM deposition in human body) , 1992 .