Monitoring Upper Limb Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Insights beyond Assessment Scores

Background Preclinical investigations in animal models demonstrate that enhanced upper limb (UL) activity during rehabilitation promotes motor recovery following spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite this, following SCI in humans, no commonly applied training protocols exist, and therefore, activity-based rehabilitative therapies (ABRT) vary in frequency, duration, and intensity. Quantification of UL recovery is limited to subjective questionnaires or scattered measures of muscle function and movement tasks. Objective To objectively measure changes in UL activity during acute SCI rehabilitation and to assess the value of wearable sensors as novel measurement tools that are complimentary to standard clinical assessments tools. Methods The overall amount of UL activity and kinematics of wheeling were measured longitudinally with wearable sensors in 12 thoracic and 19 cervical acute SCI patients (complete and incomplete). The measurements were performed for up to seven consecutive days, and simultaneously, SCI-specific assessments were made during rehabilitation sessions 1, 3, and 6 months after injury. Changes in UL activity and function over time were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results During acute rehabilitation, the overall amount of UL activity and the active distance wheeled significantly increased in tetraplegic patients, but remained constant in paraplegic patients. The same tendency was shown in clinical scores with the exception of those for independence, which showed improvements at the beginning of the rehabilitation period, even in paraplegic subjects. In the later stages of acute rehabilitation, the quantity of UL activity in tetraplegic individuals matched that of their paraplegic counterparts, despite their greater motor impairments. Both subject groups showed higher UL activity during therapy time compared to the time outside of therapy time. Conclusion Tracking day-to-day UL activity is necessary to gain insights into the real impact of a patient’s impairments on their UL movements during therapy and during their leisure time. In the future, this novel methodology may be used to reliably control and adjust ABRT and to evaluate the progress of UL rehabilitation in clinical trials.

[1]  A. Curt,et al.  Intralimb coordination as a sensitive indicator of motor-control impairment after spinal cord injury , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  J. Bussmann,et al.  A more active lifestyle in persons with a recent spinal cord injury benefits physical fitness and health , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[3]  Flora Hammond,et al.  Inpatient treatment time across disciplines in spinal cord injury rehabilitation , 2011, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[4]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper limb kinematics after cervical spinal cord injury: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Individual muscle contributions to push and recovery subtasks during wheelchair propulsion. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[7]  J. Mcdonald,et al.  Activity-based restorative therapies: concepts and applications in spinal cord injury-related neurorehabilitation. , 2009, Developmental disabilities research reviews.

[8]  M. Cohen,et al.  Use of shoulder flexors to achieve isometric elbow extension in C6 tetraplegic patients during weight shift , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[9]  R. Gassert,et al.  Novel Sensor Technology To Assess Independence and Limb-Use Laterality in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. , 2016, Journal of neurotrauma.

[10]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  M. Galea,et al.  Effects of training on upper limb function after cervical spinal cord injury: a systematic review , 2015, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  Marc Bolliger,et al.  Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  Henk J Stam,et al.  A prospective study on physical activity levels after spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation and the year after discharge. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  K. Anderson.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[15]  G. Stucki,et al.  Maximal Isometric Muscle Strength: Normative Values and Gender-Specific Relation to Age , 2000, Clinical Rheumatology.

[16]  M. Schwab,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in the Adult Rat after Unilateral Corticospinal Tract Injury , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Dina Brooks,et al.  A Novel Approach to Ambulatory Monitoring , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[18]  R. Welch,et al.  Functional independence in quadriplegia: critical levels. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  M. Verrier,et al.  Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[20]  E. Kerckhofs,et al.  Outcome of motor training programmes on arm and hand functioning in patients with cervical spinal cord injury according to different levels of the ICF: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  Roger Gassert,et al.  Low-power sensor module for long-term activity monitoring , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Jeffrey P. Cuthbert,et al.  Autologous incubated macrophage therapy in acute, complete spinal cord injury: results of the phase 2 randomized controlled multicenter trial , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[23]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Validation of the Physical Activity Scale for individuals with physical disabilities. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  D. Backus,et al.  Physical therapy treatment time during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation , 2011, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[25]  Mark H. Tuszynski,et al.  Spinal cord injury: plasticity, regeneration and the challenge of translational drug development , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  A Moncada-Torres,et al.  Activity classification based on inertial and barometric pressure sensors at different anatomical locations , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[27]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Roger Gassert,et al.  A novel algorithm for detecting active propulsion in wheelchair users following spinal cord injury. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  M. Jannink,et al.  Systematic review of the effects of exercise therapy on the upper extremity of patients with spinal-cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[30]  L. Noreau,et al.  Comparison of three methods to assess muscular strength in individuals with spinal cord injury , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[31]  Marieke G M Kloosterman,et al.  Influence of gravity compensation on kinematics and muscle activation patterns during reach and retrieval in subjects with cervical spinal cord injury: an explorative study. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  John H. Martin,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of Spared Corticospinal Axons Augments Connections with Ipsilateral Spinal Motor Circuits after Injury , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  I Gelernter,et al.  The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  H. Chubb,et al.  The use of Z-scores in paediatric cardiology , 2012, Annals of Pediatric Cardiology.

[35]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians , 2012, International journal of endocrinology and metabolism.

[36]  Rehabilitative training following unilateral pyramidotomy in adult rats improves forelimb function in a non-task-specific way , 2011, Experimental Neurology.

[37]  Roger Gassert,et al.  Classification of Stair Ascent and Descent in Stroke Patients , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks Workshops.

[38]  D. Bassett,et al.  The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[39]  John H. Martin,et al.  Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury , 2016, Experimental Neurology.

[40]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[41]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Statistics of Natural Movements Are Reflected in Motor Errors , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  John H. Martin,et al.  Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Intact Corticospinal System after Unilateral Injury Restores Skilled Locomotor Control and Promotes Spinal Axon Outgrowth , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Steeves,et al.  Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[44]  H. Stam,et al.  A behavioural intervention increases physical activity in people with subacute spinal cord injury: a randomised trial. , 2016, Journal of physiotherapy.

[45]  Mary Jane Mulcahey,et al.  Reference for the 2011 revision of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury , 2011, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[46]  C. Lang,et al.  An Accelerometry-Based Methodology for Assessment of Real-World Bilateral Upper Extremity Activity , 2014, PloS one.

[47]  Malcolm H. Granat,et al.  Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment: a validation study , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[48]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Manual Wheelchair Use: Bouts of Mobility in Everyday Life , 2012, Rehabilitation research and practice.

[49]  H. Seelen,et al.  Evaluation of upper extremity motor function tests in tetraplegics , 2002, Spinal Cord.

[50]  Roger Gassert,et al.  Multi-Day Recordings of Wearable Sensors Are Valid and Sensitive Measures of Function and Independence in Human Spinal Cord Injury. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.