Allometric relationships for below- and aboveground biomass of young Scots pines

For 10-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees allometric relationships describing branch and needle biomass at the branch level, as well as biomass of stems, branches, needles, coarse roots, small roots and total biomass at the tree level, were developed and compared. Height profiles of branch and needle biomass as well as biomass allocation were also analyzed. At the branch level, the relationships of branch diameter, branch length and whorl position were the best to predict branch and needle biomass. They were able to explain 96% of the observed variation for branches and needles. Simple allometric relationships of whorl height accurately predicted vertical distribution of branch and needle biomass as well as of their total, and explained more than 96% of the observed variation. The vertical distributions of biomass of branches, of needles and of their total, were very similar and were skewed vertically downward. At the tree level stem diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height were significant determinants of biomass of stems, coarse roots and small roots. Similarly DBH, tree height and crown length were the predominant variables of biomass of branches and needles, and of the entire tree biomass. All together, allometric relationships with DBH were the best to estimate biomass of all above- and belowground compartments. These relationships were able to explain more than 98% of the observed variation. For 4.5‐5.6 m tall trees with an average DBH of 7.16 cm, the entire tree biomass was 13.38 kg. On average 33.9% of the biomass was allocated to the stem, 25% to the branches, 22% to the needles, 17.8% to the coarse roots and 1.3% to small roots. The ratio of belowground biomass to aboveground biomass amounted to 0.26. # 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a 73-year-old Scots pine forest. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[2]  Q. Ketterings,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests , 2001 .

[3]  Petteri Vanninen,et al.  Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[4]  Takao Fujimori,et al.  Crown and Canopy Structure in Relation to Productivity. , 1987 .

[5]  V. Clark Baldwin,et al.  Equations for estimating loblolly pine branch and foliage weight and surface area distributions , 1997 .

[6]  D. V. Lear,et al.  Above- and below-stump biomass and nutrient content of a mature loblolly pine plantation , 1995 .

[7]  Bernard R. Parresol,et al.  A new model for cork weight estimation in Northern Portugal with methodology for construction of confidence intervals , 2001 .

[8]  R. Horntvedt,et al.  Crown density of spruce trees related to needle biomass , 1993 .

[9]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Effects of age and site quality on the distribution of biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) , 1996, Trees.

[10]  V. Baldwin Is sapwood area a better predictor of loblolly pine crown biomass than bole diameter , 1989 .

[11]  M. Cannell,et al.  Attributes of trees as crop plants , 1985 .

[12]  P. Reich,et al.  Needle nutrients in geographically diverse Pinus sylvestris L. populations , 2002 .

[13]  H. Brix Effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilization on branch and foliage production in Douglas-fir , 1981 .

[14]  N. Comerford,et al.  Biomass development for intensively managed loblolly pine plantations growing on Spodosols in the southeastern USA , 2002 .

[15]  B. Parresol Assessing Tree and Stand Biomass: A Review with Examples and Critical Comparisons , 1999, Forest Science.

[16]  J. Kershaw,et al.  Crown structure in western hemlock, Douglas-fir, and grand fir in western Washington: trends in branch-level mass and leaf area , 1995 .

[17]  H. Persson,et al.  Spatial distribution of fine-root growth, mortality and decomposition in a young Scots pine stand in Central Sweden , 1980 .

[18]  J. Lassoie,et al.  Techniques and approaches in forest tree ecophysiology , 1991 .

[19]  J. Clair Family differences in equations for predicting biomass and leaf area in Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii ). , 1993 .

[20]  Robert A. Monserud,et al.  Allometric crown relations in three northern Idaho conifer species , 1999 .

[21]  S. Kellomäki,et al.  Below- and above-ground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland , 2002 .

[22]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass , 2004 .

[23]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[24]  Will Steffen,et al.  Global change and terrestrial ecosystems , 1996 .

[25]  G. H. Brister,et al.  Estimating Crown Biomass in Loblolly Pine Plantations in the Carolina Flatwoods , 1982 .

[26]  L. Marklund,et al.  Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden , 1988 .

[27]  M. Ter-Mikaelian,et al.  Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species , 1997 .

[28]  Bernard R. Parresol,et al.  Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations , 2001 .

[29]  P. Hakkila Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass , 1989 .

[30]  H. Ishii,et al.  Crown structure of old-growth Douglas-fir in the western Cascade Range, Washington , 2001 .

[31]  T. C. Hennessey,et al.  Comparison of branch biomass relationships for North Carolina and Oklahoma/Arkansas loblolly pine seed sources growing in southeastern Oklahoma , 2002 .

[32]  Robert H. Kargon,et al.  Knowledge for Use: Science, Higher Learning, and America's New Industrial Heartland, 1880-1915 , 2002 .

[33]  Didier Bert,et al.  Allometric relationships for branch and tree woody biomass of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aı̈t.) , 2002 .

[34]  M. Rapp,et al.  Productivity and nutrient uptake in a holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) stand and during regeneration after clearcut , 1992, Vegetatio.

[35]  E. Schulze,et al.  Comparing the influence of site quality, stand age, fire and climate on aboveground tree production in Siberian Scots pine forests. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[36]  Mingguang Xu,et al.  Foliage biomass distribution of loblolly pine as affected by tree dominance, crown size, and stand characteristics , 1998 .

[37]  I. S. Regina,et al.  Aboveground biomass in a beech forest and a Scots pine plantation in the Sierra de la Demanda area of northern Spain , 1997 .

[38]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  Amount and vertical distribution of foliage of young loblolly pine trees as affected by canopy position and silvicultural treatment , 1994 .