Congestion Management in European Power Networks: Criteria to Assess the Available Options

EU Member States are pursuing large scale investment in renewable generation in order to meet a 2020 target to source 20% of total energy sources by renewables. As the location for this new generation differs from the location of existing generation sources, and is often on the extremities of the electricity network, it will create new flow patterns and transmission needs. While congestion exists between European countries, increasing the penetration of variable sources of energy will change the current cross-border congestion profile. It becomes increasingly important for the power market design to foster the full use of existing transmission capacity and allow for robust operation even in the presence of system congestion. After identifying five criteria that an effective congestion management scheme for European countries will need, this paper critically assess to what extent the various approaches satisfy the requirements.

[1]  Karsten Neuhoff,et al.  Working Papers in Economics CWPE 0463 Electricity Transmission : An Overview of the Current Debate , 2004 .

[2]  Seth Blumsack Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration , 2007 .

[3]  F. Schweppe Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[4]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  The Design of US Wholesale Energy and Ancillary Service Auction Markets: Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[5]  WILLIAM W. HOGAN FLOWGATE RIGHTS AND WRONGS , 2000 .

[6]  WILLIAM W. HOGAN RESTRUCTURING THE ELECTRICITY MARKET : INSTITUTIONS FOR NETWORK SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[7]  E. Fumagalli,et al.  Integrating European Electricity Markets , 2009 .

[8]  W. Hogan Contract networks for electric power transmission , 1992 .

[9]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Inefficiencies in European Congestion Management Proposals , 2004 .

[10]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Coordinated interchange scheduling and opportunity cost payment: a market proposal to seams issues , 2004 .

[11]  Richard Green Electricity Transmission Pricing: How much does it cost to get it wrong? , 2004 .

[12]  Kurt Jörnsten,et al.  Benefits from coordinating congestion management—The Nordic power market , 2007 .

[13]  William Huang,et al.  Long-Term Rights for New Resources: A Crucial Missing Ingredient in RTO Markets , 2005 .

[14]  F. Leuthold,et al.  Nodal Pricing in the German Electricity Sector - A Welfare Economics Analysis, with Particular Reference to Implementing Offshore Wind Capacities , 2005 .

[15]  Frieder Borggrefe,et al.  Balancing and Intraday Market Design: Options for Wind Integration , 2011 .

[16]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Coarse-grained distributed optimal power flow , 1997 .

[17]  The Effect of Counter-trading on Competition in the Dutch Electricity Market , 2009 .

[18]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Independent System Operators in The USA. History, Lessons Learned, and Prospects , 2006 .

[19]  Financial Transmission Rights in Europe’s Electricity Market , 2008 .

[20]  A Review of Recent RTO Benefit-Cost Studies: Toward MoreComprehensive Assessments of FERC Electricity RestructuringPolicies , 2005 .

[21]  E. Mansur,et al.  Market Organization and Market Efficiency in Electricity Markets , 2007 .

[22]  R. Baldick,et al.  Border Flow Rights and Contracts for Differences of Differences: Models for Electric Transmission Property Rights , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  Karen Lyons,et al.  An Introduction to Financial Transmission Rights , 2000 .