Design of a Surfactant Remediation Field Demonstration Based on Laboratory and Modeling Studies

Surfactant-enhanced subsurface remediation is being evaluated as an innovative technology for expediting ground-water remediation. This paper reports on laboratory and modeling studies conducted in preparation for a pilot-scale field test of surfactant-enhanced subsurface remediation. Laboratory batch and column studies evaluated the surfactant-contaminant ground-water interactions in an effort to properly design the field-scale demonstration. A series of laboratory tracer tests and numerical simulations were completed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the hydraulic system (a vertical circulation well-VCW) for capturing injected solutions in a shallow, highly conductive, unconfined ground-water formation. The results of these studies were then used to optimize the performance of the VCW system during the subsequent field-scale demonstration study which utilized the VCW for injecting and extracting a surfactant solution. Information from the simulation studies, combined with the results of the batch and column tests, was crucial for procuring regulatory approval for the field demonstration, and successful design of the field-scale demonstration.

[1]  J. Fountain Field Tests of Surfactant Flooding: Mobility Control of Dense Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids , 1992 .

[2]  Jeffrey H. Harwell,et al.  Surfactants and subsurface remediation , 1992 .

[3]  Joseph D. Rouse,et al.  Surfactant Selection for Optimizing Surfactant-Enhanced Subsurface Remediation , 1995 .

[4]  Jeffrey H. Harwell,et al.  Solubilization and Microemulsification of Chlorinated Solvents Using Direct Food Additive (Edible) Surfactants , 1994 .

[5]  T. Gibson,et al.  In Situ Surfactant Washing of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Oils from a Contaminated Site , 1992 .

[6]  C. C. West,et al.  Surfactant Remediation Field Demonstration Using a Vertical Circulation Well , 1997 .

[7]  David A. Sabatini,et al.  Characteristics of Rhodamine WT and Fluorescein as Adsorbing Ground‐Water Tracers , 1991 .

[8]  Prediction of Flow and Hydraulic Head Fields for Vertical Circulation Wells , 1992 .

[9]  Richard G. Luthy,et al.  SOLUBILIZATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN MICELLAR NONIONIC SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS , 1991 .

[10]  C. C. West Surfactant-Enhanced Solubilization of Tetrachloroethylene and Degradation Products in Pump and Treat Remediation , 1992 .

[11]  Pope Ga,et al.  Lessons from enhanced oil recovery research for surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation. , 1995 .

[12]  J. Fountain,et al.  Enhanced Removal of Dense Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids Using Surfactants: Capabilities and Limitations from Field Trials , 1995 .

[13]  D. Sabatini,et al.  Minimizing surfactant losses using twin-head anionic surfactants in subsurface remediation , 1993 .

[14]  Richard G. Luthy,et al.  Surfactant Solubilization of Organic Compounds in Soil/Aqueous Systems , 1994 .

[15]  T. R. MacDonald,et al.  Modeling the Free Surface of an Unconfined Aquifer Near a Recirculation Well , 1993 .

[16]  L. Thibodeaux,et al.  Relationships between micelle-water and octanol-water partition constants for hydrophobic organics of environmental interest , 1989 .

[17]  D. Sabatini,et al.  Surfactant-Enhanced Subsurface Remediation: Emerging Technologies , 1995 .