The medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control (ABC) trial: a multi-site randomized controlled trial in a hypertensive, multi-cultural, economically disadvantaged population.

The Medication Adherence and BP Control Trial (ABC Trial) is a randomized, controlled, multi-site, medication adherence and blood pressure (BP) control trial in an economically disadvantaged and multi-cultural population of hypertensive patients followed in primary care practices. To date, no other such trial has been published in which objective measures of adherence (electronic pill bottles) were used to assess the effectiveness of these behavioral interventions for hypertension. This study tested a combination of commercially-available interventions that can be easily accessed by health care providers and patients, and therefore may provide a real-world solution to the problem of non-adherence among hypertensives. The aim of the ABC Trial was to test the effectiveness of a stepped care intervention in improving both medication adherence to an antihypertensive medication regimen and BP control. Step 1 of the intervention employed home Self-BP Monitoring (SBPM); at this stage, there were two arms: (1) Usual Care (UC) and (2) Intervention. At Step 2, patients in the intervention arm whose BP had not come under control after 3 months were further randomized to one of two conditions: (1) continuation of SBPM (alone) or (2) continuation of SBPM plus telephone-based nurse case management (SBPM+NCM). Electronic Medication Event Monitoring (MEMS) was the primary measure of medication adherence, and in-office BP was the primary measure of hypertension control. We present an overview of the study design, details of the administrative structure of the study and a description of clinical site recruitment, patient recruitment, and follow-up assessments.

[1]  J. Wasson,et al.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. , 1992, JAMA.

[2]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[3]  W. Tierney,et al.  Can the provision of information to patients with osteoarthritis improve functional status? A randomized, controlled trial. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  F. Cappuccio,et al.  Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  D. Hedeker,et al.  MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis. , 1996, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[6]  B. Davis,et al.  Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). , 2002, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[7]  P. Albert,et al.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[8]  P. Sorlie,et al.  The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: A Rising Tide , 2004, Hypertension.

[9]  N. Miller The use of the telephone in cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation. , 1996, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[10]  John E. Stollerman,et al.  A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. , 1996, American journal of hypertension.

[11]  J. Hasford,et al.  Compliance and the Benefit/Risk Relationship of Antihypertensive Treatment , 1992, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[12]  Morris Weinberger,et al.  A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus , 1995, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  C. Dennis,et al.  A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  J. Cramer,et al.  How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. , 1989, JAMA.

[15]  Barry R. Davis,et al.  Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT). , 2002, JAMA.

[16]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  L. Vaur,et al.  Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment compliance: comparison of once daily versus twice daily regimen. , 2000, American journal of hypertension.

[18]  B. Davis,et al.  The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT): clinical center recruitment experience. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[19]  J K Lindsey,et al.  On the appropriateness of marginal models for repeated measurements in clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  J. Piette,et al.  Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  G Chatellier,et al.  Feasibility study of N-of-1 trials with blood pressure self-monitoring in hypertension. , 1995, HYPERTENSION.

[22]  Alice Sardell,et al.  Clinical networks and clinician retention: The case of CDN , 1996, Journal of Community Health.

[23]  R. Gillum,et al.  Determinants of dropout rate among hypertensive patients in an urban clinic , 2005, Journal of community health.

[24]  M. Hill,et al.  The multilevel compliance challenge: recommendations for a call to action. A statement for healthcare professionals. , 1997, Circulation.

[25]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. , 2003, Hypertension.

[26]  E. Nardell,et al.  Using automated pharmacy records to assess the management of tuberculosis. , 1999, Emerging infectious diseases.

[27]  Detection The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) , 1997 .

[28]  D. Sackett,et al.  Can Simple Clinical Measurements Detect Patient Noncompliance? , 1980, Hypertension.

[29]  L. Vaur,et al.  Benefits of electronic pillboxes in evaluating treatment compliance of patients with mild to moderate hypertension , 1996, Journal of hypertension.

[30]  W. P. Munroe,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medication Compliance Aid on Long‐Term Blood Pressure Control , 1992, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[31]  B. Peterson,et al.  Nurse Case Management To Improve Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients in a Health Maintenance Organization , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Review papers : Longitudinal studies with continuous responses , 1992 .

[33]  J. Kirscht,et al.  Determinants of drug treatment maintenance among hypertensive persons in inner city Detroit. , 1982, Public health reports.

[34]  R. Wit,et al.  How often is medication taken as prescribed , 1993 .

[35]  S. Shea,et al.  Hypertensive emergency: case criteria, sociodemographic profile, and previous care of 100 cases. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[36]  K Y Liang,et al.  An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  E. O’Brien,et al.  An outline of the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. , 1993, Journal of hypertension.

[38]  N. Miller,et al.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle modification: the MULTIFIT model. , 1996, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.