Utilizing spatial and spectral features of photoacoustic imaging for ovarian cancer detection and diagnosis

Abstract. A composite set of ovarian tissue features extracted from photoacoustic spectral data, beam envelope, and co-registered ultrasound and photoacoustic images are used to characterize malignant and normal ovaries using logistic and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Normalized power spectra were calculated from the Fourier transform of the photoacoustic beamformed data, from which the spectral slopes and 0-MHz intercepts were extracted. Five features were extracted from the beam envelope and another 10 features were extracted from the photoacoustic images. These 17 features were ranked by their p-values from t-tests on which a filter type of feature selection method was used to determine the optimal feature number for final classification. A total of 169 samples from 19 ex vivo ovaries were randomly distributed into training and testing groups. Both classifiers achieved a minimum value of the mean misclassification error when the seven features with lowest p-values were selected. Using these seven features, the logistic and SVM classifiers obtained sensitivities of 96.39±3.35% and 97.82±2.26%, and specificities of 98.92±1.39% and 100%, respectively, for the training group. For the testing group, logistic and SVM classifiers achieved sensitivities of 92.71±3.55% and 92.64±3.27%, and specificities of 87.52±8.78% and 98.49±2.05%, respectively.

[1]  R. Mucci A comparison of efficient beamforming algorithms , 1984 .

[2]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Comparisons of the Rayleigh and K-distribution models using in vivo breast and liver tissue. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging enhanced by indocyanine green-conjugated single-wall carbon nanotubes , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  S. Lele,et al.  New modalities in detection of recurrent ovarian cancer , 2004, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[6]  Hongju Son,et al.  Role of FDG PET/CT in staging of recurrent ovarian cancer. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Srirang Manohar,et al.  Imaging of tumor vasculature using Twente photoacoustic systems , 2009, Journal of biophotonics.

[9]  Manojit Pramanik,et al.  Design and evaluation of a novel breast cancer detection system combining both thermoacoustic (TA) and photoacoustic (PA) tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. , 2009, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[11]  D. Jurkovic,et al.  Simple ultrasound‐based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  Molly Brewer,et al.  Coregistered three-dimensional ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging system for ovarian tissue characterization. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  Quing Zhu,et al.  FPGA-based reconfigurable processor for ultrafast interlaced ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Diljeet Singh,et al.  The role of ultrasound evaluation in the detection of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  Chao Tao,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography of tissue subwavelength microstructure with a narrowband and low frequency system , 2012 .

[16]  G. Scambia,et al.  Sonographic features of decidualized ovarian endometriosis suspicious for malignancy , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Chao Tao,et al.  Quantitative detection of stochastic microstructure in turbid media by photoacoustic spectral matching , 2013 .

[18]  D. Oram,et al.  A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  Tianheng Wang,et al.  Characterization of ovarian tissue based on quantitative analysis of photoacoustic microscopy images. , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[20]  R Kahavi,et al.  Wrapper for feature subset selection , 1997 .

[21]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Frequency-domain analysis of photoacoustic imaging data from prostate adenocarcinoma tumors in a murine model. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Maryam Rezvani,et al.  Ovarian Cancer: Detection and Radiologic Staging , 2009, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[23]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[25]  Satadru Ray,et al.  Photoacoustic spectroscopy of ovarian normal, benign, and malignant tissues: a pilot study. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[26]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[27]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Curved array photoacoustic tomographic system for small animal imaging. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[28]  Byung Kwan Park,et al.  Detection of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer at MRI: Comparison With Integrated PET/CT , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[29]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Distortion-invariant pattern recognition with Fourier-plane nonlinear filters. , 1996, Applied optics.

[30]  F. D. de Mul,et al.  Image reconstruction for photoacoustic scanning of tissue structures. , 2000, Applied optics.

[31]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Prospects of photoacoustic tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[32]  P. Okunieff,et al.  Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. , 1989, Cancer research.

[33]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Recognition algorithm for assisting ovarian cancer diagnosis from coregistered ultrasound and photoacoustic images: ex vivo study , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[34]  Jie Yuan,et al.  The functional pitch of an organ: quantification of tissue texture with photoacoustic spectrum analysis. , 2014, Radiology.

[35]  Jane Labadin,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information , 2015, 2015 9th International Conference on IT in Asia (CITA).

[36]  P. Langley Selection of Relevant Features in Machine Learning , 1994 .

[37]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Photoacoustic spectrum analysis for microstructure characterization in biological tissue: A feasibility study. , 2012, Applied physics letters.

[38]  Merrill Goozner Personalizing ovarian cancer screening. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  Robert C. Bast,et al.  Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and followup. , 1995, NIH consensus statement.

[40]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data , 2003, Computational Systems Bioinformatics. CSB2003. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Bioinformatics Conference. CSB2003.

[41]  P. Kumavor,et al.  Co‐registered pulse‐echo/photoacoustic transvaginal probe for real time imaging of ovarian tissue , 2013, Journal of biophotonics.

[42]  N. Weiss,et al.  Predictive value of symptoms for early detection of ovarian cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[43]  Feng Su,et al.  The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[45]  Molly Brewer,et al.  Potential role of coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging in ovarian cancer detection and characterization. , 2011, Translational oncology.