Building the public sphere : Bases and biases

The paper continues the rhetorical line of research of the public sphere, approaching it from a general theoretical perspective. The goal of the present paper is twofold: it strives to understand the nature of the rhetorical personification of the public sphere, that is, the rhetorical slide from the many to the one, and it strives to identify the rhetorical roots of the public sphere, that is, reveal its general bases and biases. The paper traces four shifts in the discussion of the public sphere: From autonomy to inclusion, from ethnocentric to global, from transparency to mediation, and from logocentric to nonlinear. The role of time in the process of building the public sphere is underscored, presenting its dynamic as a complex topological process. It is also noted why and how this dynamic should be viewed as a tropological process.

[1]  M. Dorland,et al.  Law, Rhetoric, and Irony in the Formation of Canadian Civil Culture , 2002 .

[2]  B. Rothermel.  A sphere of noble action: Gender, rhetoric, and influence at a nineteenth‐century Massachusetts State Normal School , 2003 .

[3]  Harold E. Mah.  Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians* , 2000, The Journal of Modern History.

[4]  G. Hauser,et al.  Rhetorical Democracy : Discursive Practices of Civic Engagement , 2004 .

[5]  Michael D. Kennedy,et al.  Globalizations and Social Movements: Culture, Power, and the Transnational Public Sphere , 2000 .

[6]  H. Arendt,et al.  The Human Condition , 1960 .

[7]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics , 1993 .

[8]  Matthias Lutz-Bachmann,et al.  Perpetual peace : essays on Kant's cosmopolitan ideal , 1997 .

[9]  C. Calhoun.  Habermas and the public sphere , 1993 .

[10]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays , 2001 .

[11]  J. Habermas.  Communication and the Evolution of Society , 1979 .

[12]  B. Baum.  Freedom, Power and Public Opinion: J.S. Mill on the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[13]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  De Bary,et al.  Asian Values and Human Rights: A Confucian Communitarian Perspective , 1998 .

[15]  I. Berlin,et al.  Four Essays on Liberty , 1969 .

[16]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Culture, technology, communication : towards an intercultural global village , 2001 .

[17]  J. Habermas.  The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity , 1985 .

[18]  Chenyang Li.  The Tao Encounters the West: Explorations in Comparative Philosophy , 1999 .

[19]  S. Crowley.  Ancient rhetorics for contemporary students , 1994 .

[20]  G. Hauser.  Civil society and the principle of the public sphere , 1998 .

[21]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere , 2004 .

[22]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory , 1999 .

[23]  B. Vivian.  Being Made Strange: Rhetoric beyond Representation , 2004 .

[24]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[25]  K. Burke.  A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[26]  Jodi Dean,et al.  Cybersalons and Civil Society: Rethinking the Public Sphere in Transnational Technoculture , 2001 .

[27]  Kees Brants,et al.  Guest Editor's Introduction: The Internet and the Public Sphere , 2005 .

[28]  A. McKee.  The Public Sphere: An Introduction , 2004 .

[29]  S. Benhabib,et al.  Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange , 1994 .

[30]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[31]  Gerard A. Hauser,et al.  Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres , 1999 .

[32]  John Keane,et al.  Global Civil Society?: Further reading , 2003 .

[33]  J. Habermas.  Three Normative Models of Democracy , 1994, Democracy and Difference.

[34]  A. Pinter.  Public Sphere and History: Historians’ Response to Habermas on the “Worth” of the Past , 2004 .

[35]  K. Burke,et al.  The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action , 1941 .

[36]  Natalie Fenton,et al.  New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere , 2003, New Media Soc..

[37]  P. Marden.  The Decline of Politics: Governance, Globalization, and the Public Sphere , 2003 .

[38]  Douglas Kellner,et al.  The Postmodern Turn , 1997 .

[39]  D. Porter.  Internet Culture , 1996 .

[40]  "Mony Choaks": The Quaker Critique of the Seventeenth-Century Public Sphere , 2000, Modern Philology.

[41]  C. Hann,et al.  Civil Society: Challenging Western Models , 1996 .

[42]  C. D. Landtsheer,et al.  Politically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in the Public Sphere , 1998 .

[43]  Stephen K. White,et al.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to Habermas , 1997 .

[44]  Jane Braaten,et al.  Habermas's critical theory of society , 1991 .

[45]  Linda-Renée Bloch.  Setting the Public Sphere in Motion: The Rhetoric of Political Bumper Stickers in Israel , 2000 .

[46]  C. K. Doreski.  Writing America Black: Race Rhetoric in the Public Sphere , 1998 .

[47]  H. White.  Tropics of discourse : essays in cultural criticism , 1979 .

[48]  Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos.  Southern Political Science Association Politics , Speech , and the Art of Persuasion : Toward an Aristotelian Conception of the Public Sphere , 2007 .

[49]  R. Asen,et al.  Counterpublics and the state , 2001 .

[50]  Rachel Kovacs.  The broadcasting public sphere: Enduring issues, enduring relationships, enduring activists , 2003 .

[51]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .