Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation

Round-window (RW) stimulation has improved speech perception in patients with mixed hearing loss. In cadaveric temporal bones, we recently showed that RW stimulation with an active prosthesis produced differential pressure across the cochlear partition (a measure related to cochlear transduction) similar to normal forward sound stimulation above 1 kHz, when contact area between the prosthesis and RW is secured. However, there is large variability in the hearing improvement in patients implanted with existing modified prosthesis. This is likely because the middle-ear prosthesis used for RW stimulation was designed for a very different application. In this paper, we utilize recently developed experimental techniques that allow for the calculation of performance specifications for a RW actuator. In cadaveric human temporal bones (N=3), we simultaneously measure scala vestibuli and scala tympani intracochlear pressures, as well as stapes velocity and ear-canal pressure, during normal forward sound stimulation as well as reverse RW stimulation. We then calculate specifications such as the impedance the actuator will need to oppose at the RW, the force with which it must push against the RW, and the velocity and distance by which it must move the RW to obtain cochlear stimulation equivalent to that of specific levels of ear-canal pressure under normal sound stimulation. This information is essential for adapting existing prostheses and for designing new actuators specifically for RW stimulation.

[1]  W. Arnold,et al.  Cochlear Mechanics and Otoacoustic Emissions , 2006 .

[2]  J. Niparko,et al.  Anatomy of the round Window Niche , 1986, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  M. Lawrence,et al.  The Acoustic Pathways to the Cochlea , 1950 .

[4]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance , 2001, Hearing Research.

[5]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  Integration des aktiven Mittelohrimplantates in die plastische Ohrmuschelrekonstruktion , 2007, HNO.

[6]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J M Aran,et al.  Piezoelectric middle ear implant preserving the ossicular chain. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[8]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  Evaluation of Round Window Stimulation Using the Floating Mass Transducer by Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Human Temporal Bones , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  R. Schönweiler,et al.  [Integration of the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in total auricular reconstruction]. , 2007, HNO (Berlin. Print).

[10]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[11]  E. Olson,et al.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Differential Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[13]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  V. Nedzelnitsky,et al.  Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[16]  R A Ruth,et al.  The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[17]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  T. Linder,et al.  Active Middle Ear Implants in Patients Undergoing Subtotal Petrosectomy: New Application for the Vibrant Soundbridge Device and Its Implication for Lateral Cranium Base Surgery , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  Christian Streitberger,et al.  Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to Cochlea Round Window: Auditory Results in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[20]  A. Dancer,et al.  Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs , 1980, Hearing Research.

[21]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .