An animal model for cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE To test the feasibility of using the deaf white cat model of early-onset deafness. We studied the neuronal effects of prosthetic intervention with a clinical, "off-the-shelf" multichannel cochlear implant. METHODS We placed cochlear implants in 5 deaf white kittens at age 12 and 24 weeks. The devices were activated and stimulated in the laboratory using a clinical speech processor programmed with a high-resolution continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy for 8 to 24 weeks. Stimulus parameters were guided by electrically evoked brainstem responses and intracochlear-evoked potentials. Kittens were assessed with respect to their tolerance and general behavior in response to speech, music, and environmental sounds. RESULTS Surgical complications were minimal, and kittens tolerated the experimental procedures well. Subjects were able to detect and respond to a specific sound played from a computer speaker. Electrophysiologic responses were reliably attainable and showed consistency with observed behavioral responses to sound. This experimental paradigm, using clinical devices, can be used in a practical research setting in cats. CONCLUSIONS Deafness and other variations in neural activity result in many distinct changes to the central auditory pathways. Animal models will facilitate assessment of the reversibility of deafness-associated changes at the level of the neuron and its connections. Our observations of the feasibility of using clinical devices in animal models will enable us to simulate clinical conditions in addressing questions about the effects of "replacement" activity on the structure and function within the central auditory pathways in deafness.

[1]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Cross-Modal Plasticity Underpins Language Recovery after Cochlear Implantation , 2001, Neuron.

[2]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[3]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Cochlear implants in adults and children. , 1995, NIH consensus statement.

[4]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: Effects on cochlear nucleus morphology , 1991, Hearing Research.

[5]  A Kral,et al.  Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation. , 1999, Science.

[6]  J. Niparko,et al.  Single unit recordings in the auditory nerve of congenitally deaf white cats: Morphological correlates in the cochlea and cochlear nucleus , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  J. Niparko,et al.  Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: Morphologic alterations in endbulbs of held , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[9]  Y. Yonekura,et al.  Sound-induced activation of auditory cortices in cochlear implant users with post- and prelingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  G. K. Noorden Experimental amblyopia in monkeys . Further behavioral observations and clinical correlations , 2005 .

[11]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Changes in the cat cochlear nucleus following neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation , 1994, Hearing Research.

[12]  Mair Iw Hereditary deafness in the white cat. , 1973 .

[13]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[14]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Deafness: Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants , 2001, Nature.

[15]  I. Mair Hereditary deafness in the white cat. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[16]  François Lazeyras,et al.  Functional MRI of Auditory Cortex Activated by Multisite Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Nadol,et al.  Morphometric changes in the cochlear nucleus in patients who had undergone cochlear implantation for bilateral profound deafness 1 1 This study was supported by NIDCD grant, Electron Microscopy of the Human Inner Ear #R01DC00152-22. , 2002, Hearing Research.

[18]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children , 1995 .

[19]  Brain Activities of Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Children Using Cochlear Implants , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[20]  Y Yonekura,et al.  Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and postlingually deaf subjects. A study with H2(15)O and PET. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  T. Wiesel Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment , 1982, Nature.

[22]  Raphael Lorente De No,et al.  The Primary Acoustic Nuclei , 1981 .

[23]  David K Ryugo,et al.  Primary innervation of the avian and mammalian cochlear nucleus , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[24]  Charles J. Limb,et al.  Development of Primary Axosomatic Endings in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus of Mice , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[25]  H. Francis,et al.  Cochlear implantation update. , 2003, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[26]  G. K. Noorden Original Articles: Experimental Amblyopia in Monkeys. Further Behavioral Observations and Clinical Correlations , 1973 .