Enhancing metro network resilience via localized integration with bus services

This paper advances the field of network disruption analysis by introducing an application to a multi-modal transport network, capitalizing on the redundancies and improved connectivity of an integrated metro-bus network. Metro network resilience to disruptions can be enhanced by leveraging on public bus services. To ensure better acceptance among operators and commuters, we focus on introducing localized integration with bus services instead of designing an entirely new bus network to achieve the desired resilience to potential disruptions. This is accomplished by increasing the capacity of bus services that run in parallel with affected metro lines as well as those connecting to different metro lines. Our analysis starts with a network representation to model the integrated metro and bus system. A two-stage stochastic programming model is further developed to assess the intrinsic metro network resilience as well as to optimize the localized integration with bus services. The approach is applied to a case study based on the Singapore public transit system and actual travel demand data. The results show that the metro network resilience to disruptions can be enhanced significantly from localized integration with public bus services.

[1]  Lazar N Spasovic,et al.  BUS TRANSIT SERVICE COVERAGE FOR MAXIMUM PROFIT AND SOCIAL WELFARE , 1994 .

[2]  Changzheng Liu,et al.  A two-stage stochastic programming model for transportation network protection , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  Collaboration Decisions on Disruption Recovery Service in Urban Public Tram Systems , 2012 .

[4]  Jian Gang Jin,et al.  Disruption Response Planning for an Urban Mass Rapid Transit Network , 2013 .

[5]  N. V. Rama Moorthy PLANNING OF INTEGRATED TRANSIT NETWORK FOR BUS AND LRT , 1997 .

[6]  M. Meyer,et al.  Contingency Planning for Response to Urban Transportation System Disruptions , 1982 .

[7]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee: Papers Selected for Presentation at Isttt 18, a Peer Reviewed Series Since 1959 , 2009 .

[8]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  Optimization of a bus and rail transit system with feeder bus services under different market regimes , 2009 .

[9]  J. Y. Yen,et al.  Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network , 2007 .

[10]  Jin-Kao Hao,et al.  Transit network design and scheduling: A global review , 2008 .

[11]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Cost-Saving Properties of Schedule Coordination in a Simple Trunk-and-Feeder Transit System , 2010 .

[12]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Measuring and maximizing resilience of freight transportation networks , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[13]  G. Kuah,et al.  The Feeder-bus Network-design Problem , 1989 .

[14]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Planning for the unplanned: an international review of current approaches to service disruption management of railways , 2012 .

[15]  Luis Cadarso,et al.  Recovery of disruptions in rapid transit networks , 2013 .

[16]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport , 2012, Transp. Sci..

[17]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms , 2009, Public Transp..

[18]  Sheu Hua Chen,et al.  An integral constrained generalized hub-and-spoke network design problem , 2008 .