A scaling law for the required transition zone depth in hybrid LES-DNS

There is a substantial need to better understand multi-physics interactions in realistic laboratory experiments, yet it is currently unfeasible to perform direct numerical simulations (DNS) of most such problems. As a result, reduced-order models such as those used to represent unclosed subgrid-scale stresses in large-eddy simulations (LES) and advanced numerical techniques, including adaptive mesh refinement and nested grid structures, are required for the study of multi-physics interactions in practical situations. In particular, it is now possible to model many real-world flows with LES fidelity, and to selectively refine the computational mesh in a small region of the domain to resolve multi-physics interactions with DNS fidelity. However, rules and guidance for the valid implementation of this multi-fidelity ‘hybrid LES-DNS’ approach have yet to be fully formulated. Within the embedded DNS region, multi-physics interactions will be influenced by (i) macroscale features (e.g. large-scale shear gradients or body forces that produce turbulence), (ii) LES-regulated mesoscale features (e.g. advecting turbulent eddies), and (iii) microscale features that are subgrid-scale to the LES (e.g. layers of fast-reacting intermediate chemical species). In this study, we address the second of these effects, which poses particular challenges due to the transfer and overlapping nature of advecting mesoscale eddies between the purely LES (i.e. macroscale) and purely DNS (i.e. microscale) regions. By combining dimensional analysis and computational results, we formulate a scaling law for the required depth of the transition zone surrounding the embedded DNS region within hybrid LES-DNS computations of realistic turbulent flows.

[1]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Some comments on turbulence , 1992 .

[2]  G. Eyink,et al.  Dissipation-energy flux correlations as evidence for the Lagrangian energy cascade in turbulence , 2010 .

[3]  M. Ihme,et al.  The cross-scale physical-space transfer of kinetic energy in turbulent premixed flames , 2017 .

[4]  M. Petersen,et al.  Forcing for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence , 2010 .

[5]  James M. Stone,et al.  An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport in three dimensions , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  J. Blair Perot,et al.  A self-adapting turbulence model for flow simulation at any mesh resolution , 2007 .

[7]  Clinton P. T. Groth,et al.  A parallel solution - adaptive method for three-dimensional turbulent non-premixed combusting flows , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  James F. Driscoll,et al.  Numerical simulation of a laboratory-scale turbulent slot flame , 2007 .

[9]  J. McWilliams,et al.  A grid nesting method for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows , 1996 .

[10]  R. Kraichnan Inertial-range transfer in two- and three-dimensional turbulence , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  The temporal evolution of the energy flux across scales in homogeneous turbulence , 2015, 1505.00285.

[12]  K. Ahmed,et al.  A unified mechanism for unconfined deflagration-to-detonation transition in terrestrial chemical systems and type Ia supernovae , 2019, Science.

[13]  Energy spectrum in the dissipation range of fluid turbulence , 1996 .

[14]  Clinton P. T. Groth,et al.  International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics a Parallel Adaptive Mesh Refinement Algorithm for Predicting Turbulent Non-premixed Combusting Flows a Parallel Adaptive Mesh Refinement Algorithm for Predicting Turbulent Non-premixed Combusting Flows , 2022 .

[15]  R. Shaw PARTICLE-TURBULENCE INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CLOUDS , 2003 .

[16]  R. Barlow,et al.  Effects of high shear on the structure and thickness of turbulent premixed methane/air flames stabilized on a bluff-body burner , 2015 .

[17]  D. Donzis,et al.  Reynolds and Mach number scaling in solenoidally-forced compressible turbulence using high-resolution direct numerical simulations , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Said Elghobashi,et al.  On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows , 1994 .

[19]  M. Ihme,et al.  Spectral kinetic energy transfer in turbulent premixed reacting flows. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[20]  P. Spalart,et al.  A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities , 2006 .

[21]  Javier Urzay,et al.  Supersonic Combustion in Air-Breathing Propulsion Systems for Hypersonic Flight , 2018 .

[22]  G. D. Conway,et al.  Turbulence measurements in fusion plasmas , 2008 .

[23]  P. Hamlington,et al.  Detonation initiation by compressible turbulence thermodynamic fluctuations , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[24]  S. Pope Turbulent Flows: FUNDAMENTALS , 2000 .

[25]  P. Teuben,et al.  Athena: A New Code for Astrophysical MHD , 2008, 0804.0402.

[26]  P. Colella Multidimensional upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws , 1990 .

[27]  Shigeru Tachibana,et al.  A combined computational and experimental characterization of lean premixed turbulent low swirl laboratory flames , 2012 .