Effect of inter-species, gender, and breeding on the mechanical behavior of brain tissue

Mechanical response of brain tissue deforming at high rates are needed to build high-fidelity computer models for traumatic brain injury (TBI) studies. Different types of mammalian brains have been used to obtain the constitutive behavior of tissue. It is necessary to examine how these different brains compare to each other in order to determine which animal might be the best surrogate for human brain tissue. In this experimental study, fresh brain tissue from three different mammals, two types of porcine breeds, and genders were loaded under uniaxial compression over a wide range of strain rates. The experiments at higher rates were conducted with a Kolsky bar modified for soft tissue characterization, whereas lower rate experiments were performed on a conventional hydraulic material test frame. Experimental results did not show any significant difference in high-rate compressive response of the brain tissue of different animals, different breeds, and different genders. However, there was significant rate dependence for all tissues tested, especially in the Kolsky bar range. Further investigation is necessary to identify the source of the rate effects.

[1]  D. Brands Predicting brain mechanics during closed head impact : numerical and constitutive aspects , 2002 .

[2]  P. Bovendeerd,et al.  The large shear strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and a silicone gel model material. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[3]  David F. Moore,et al.  Blast physics and central nervous system injury , 2008 .

[4]  J. Melvin,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Howard Kuhn,et al.  Mechanical testing and evaluation , 2000 .

[6]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of the tissues of the head , 1973 .

[7]  J. Crandall,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Daniel Casem,et al.  Inertial effects of quartz force transducers embedded in a split Hopkinson pressure bar , 2005 .

[9]  K. Taber,et al.  Blast-related traumatic brain injury: what is known? , 2006, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[10]  M. Forrestal,et al.  A Split Hopkinson Bar Technique to Determine “ compressive Stress-Strain Data for Rock Materials ! F ? EW 5 W ’ ED , 2000 .

[11]  R. M. Kenedi Perspectives in Biomedical Engineering , 1973 .

[12]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Mechanical Characterization of Brain Tissue in High-Rate Compression , 2007 .

[13]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials , 1999 .

[14]  Michael S. Jaffee,et al.  Computational biology — Modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials , 2001 .

[16]  Gray,et al.  Classic Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing , 2000 .

[17]  R. Willinger,et al.  Shear Properties of Brain Tissue over a Frequency Range Relevant for Automotive Impact Situations: New Experimental Results. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[18]  Kurosh Darvish,et al.  On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[19]  D F Meaney,et al.  Defining brain mechanical properties: effects of region, direction, and species. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[20]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain, and dura. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  F. Lu,et al.  A quartz-crystal-embedded split Hopkinson pressure bar for soft materials , 2000 .

[22]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Philip V Bayly,et al.  Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  Weinong W Chen,et al.  Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A. Gefen,et al.  Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.