Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection

OBJECTIVE Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) that decode control signals from motor cortex have developed tremendously in the past decade, but virtually all rely exclusively on vision to provide feedback. There is now increasing interest in developing an afferent interface to replace natural somatosensation, much as the cochlear implant has done for the sense of hearing. Preliminary experiments toward a somatosensory neuroprosthesis have mostly addressed the sense of touch, but proprioception, the sense of limb position and movement, is also critical for the control of movement. However, proprioceptive areas of cortex lack the precise somatotopy of tactile areas. We showed previously that there is only a weak tendency for neighboring neurons in area 2 to signal similar directions of hand movement. Consequently, stimulation with the relatively large currents used in many studies is likely to activate a rather heterogeneous set of neurons. APPROACH Here, we have compared the effect of single-electrode stimulation at subthreshold levels to the effect of stimulating as many as seven electrodes in combination. MAIN RESULTS We found a mean enhancement in the sensitivity to the stimulus (d') of 0.17 for pairs compared to individual electrodes (an increase of roughly 30%), and an increase of 2.5 for groups of seven electrodes (260%). SIGNIFICANCE We propose that a proprioceptive interface made up of several hundred electrodes may yield safer, more effective sensation than a BMI using fewer electrodes and larger currents.

[1]  E. J. Tehovnik,et al.  Phosphene induction and the generation of saccadic eye movements by striate cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[3]  E. J. Tehovnik,et al.  Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  Active tactile exploration enabled by a brain-machine-brain interface , 2011, Nature.

[5]  L. Miller,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Proprioceptive Cortex (Area 3a) Used to Instruct a Behaving Monkey , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  C. Kufta,et al.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex , 1996 .

[7]  Lee E Miller,et al.  Responses of somatosensory area 2 neurons to actively and passively generated limb movements. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Carmena,et al.  Active Sensing of Target Location Encoded by Cortical Microstimulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  J. Ochoa,et al.  Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. J. Weber,et al.  Limb-State Information Encoded by Peripheral and Central Somatosensory Neurons: Implications for an Afferent Interface , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Peter H Schiller,et al.  Microstimulation of V1 delays the execution of visually guided saccades , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  William J Tyler,et al.  A quantitative overview of biophysical forces impinging on neural function , 2013, Physical biology.

[13]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[14]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002, Nature.

[15]  J. Thomas Mortimer,et al.  The Role of Oxygen Reduction in Electrical Stimulation of Neural Tissue , 1994 .

[16]  D. Kipke,et al.  Microstimulation in auditory cortex provides a substrate for detailed behaviors , 2005, Hearing Research.

[17]  Peter J. Ifft,et al.  Active tactile exploration using a brain – machine – brain interface , 2011 .

[18]  Victor Pikov,et al.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Robert A. Gaunt,et al.  Effects of spatial and temporal parameters of primary afferent microstimulation on neural responses evoked in primary somatosensory cortex of an anesthetized cat , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  N. Cohen,et al.  Cochlear Implants , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[21]  R. Romo,et al.  Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation , 1998, Nature.

[22]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  G.S. Dhillon,et al.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Wang,et al.  Chronic microstimulation of cat auditory cortex effective to evoke detection behaviors , 2012, Neuroscience.

[26]  Bradley Greger,et al.  The functional consequences of chronic, physiologically effective intracortical microstimulation. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[27]  R. Romo,et al.  Sensing without Touching Psychophysical Performance Based on Cortical Microstimulation , 2000, Neuron.

[28]  C. Kufta,et al.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  A Brain-Machine Interface Instructed by Direct Intracortical Microstimulation , 2009, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[30]  Bente Pakkenberg,et al.  Total numbers of neurons and glial cells in cortex and basal ganglia of aged brains with Down syndrome--a stereological study. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Lee E. Miller,et al.  Interfacing the Somatosensory System to Restore Touch and Proprioception: Essential Considerations , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  W. D. Thompson,et al.  Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Jean Bullier,et al.  Spread of stimulating current in the cortical grey matter of rat visual cortex studied on a new in vitro slice preparation , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  Kapil D. Katyal,et al.  Behavioral Demonstration of a Somatosensory Neuroprosthesis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[35]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  Rajmohan Bhandari,et al.  Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: Comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Proprioceptive activity in primate primary somatosensory cortex during active arm reaching movements. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Desimone,et al.  Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Nicholas G Hatsopoulos,et al.  Incorporating Feedback from Multiple Sensory Modalities Enhances Brain–Machine Interface Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  S. Meagher Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[42]  R. Porter Progress in Brain Research , 1965, Nature.