Micro- and nanoscale surface texturing effects on surface friction

Abstract The surface friction of smooth, microtextured, and nanotextured aluminum substrates against a half-ball shape of polydimethylsiloxane rubber was investigated under different surface humidity conditions. The work of adhesion estimated by the contact angle on nanotextured surfaces having a 250 nm scale dimple structure array was much higher than that on microtextured surfaces having a 3 μm scale dome structure array. Surface textures increased the work of adhesion, thus the surface friction of microtextured and nanotextured surfaces was increased compared to that of a smooth surface under dry conditions. On the other hand, the nanotextured surface considerably reduced the surface friction under wet surface conditions, while the surface friction of the microtextured surface was similar in both dry and wet surface conditions. In dry surface conditions, the measured surface frictions of microtextured and nanotextured aluminum substrates were 1.26 times and 2.69 times higher, respectively, than that of a smooth one. Under water lubricant conditions, the microtextured surface showed approximately 2 times higher surface friction than the smooth one, but the surface friction of the nanotextured surface was only 32% of the smooth surface.

[1]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  Reduction of barnacle recruitment on micro‐textured surfaces: Analysis of effective topographic characteristics and evaluation of skin friction , 2000 .

[2]  A. Kumar,et al.  Development of alumina–ceria ceramic composite cutting tool , 2004 .

[3]  K Nakanishi,et al.  The role of hydrated silica, titania, and alumina in inducing apatite on implants. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Surface Texture Effect on Friction of a Microtextured Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) , 2008 .

[5]  T. C. Downie,et al.  Anodic oxide films on aluminum , 1969 .

[6]  Shinya Sasaki,et al.  Applying Micro-Texture to Cast Iron Surfaces to Reduce the Friction Coefficient Under Lubricated Conditions , 2007 .

[7]  Francesco P. Mezzapesa,et al.  Friction Properties of Lubricated Laser-MicroTextured-Surfaces: An Experimental Study from Boundary- to Hydrodynamic-Lubrication , 2012, Tribology Letters.

[8]  F. Tichelaar,et al.  Thermodynamic stability of amorphous oxide films on metals: Application to aluminum oxide films on aluminum substrates , 2000 .

[9]  Lydéric Bocquet,et al.  Low-friction flows of liquid at nanopatterned interfaces , 2003, Nature materials.

[10]  Nicola Pugno,et al.  Increasing nanohardness and reducing friction of nitride steel by laser surface texturing , 2009 .

[11]  R. Wahl,et al.  Experimental study of the effect of microtexturing on oil lubricated ceramic/steel friction pairs , 2009 .

[12]  Yoshiteru Yasuda,et al.  Effect of surface texturing on friction reduction between ceramic and steel materials under lubricated sliding contact , 2003 .

[13]  Peter Andersson,et al.  Microlubrication effect by laser-textured steel surfaces , 2007 .

[14]  K. Johnson,et al.  Adhesion and friction between a smooth elastic spherical asperity and a plane surface , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  M. S. Hunter,et al.  Natural and Thermally Formed Oxide Films on Aluminum , 1956 .

[16]  Ali Erdemir,et al.  Review of engineered tribological interfaces for improved boundary lubrication , 2005 .