Fitting hearing aids with the Articulation Index: impact on hearing aid effectiveness.

Although most clinical tests focus on how much a particular hearing aid improves speech audibility under controlled conditions, it is unclear how these measures relate to hearing aid effectiveness, or the benefit perceived by the patient under everyday conditions. In this study, the relationship between audibility and hearing aid effectiveness was examined in a cohort of patients who obtained hearing aids through the Veteran's Administration. The measure of audibility was the Articulation Index, a common index of speech audibility. Measures of effectiveness included two hearing-specific surveys and self-reported ratings of global satisfaction and hearing aid use adherence. Results indicated that there were no systematic relationships between measurements of improved audibility and patient ratings of communication ability. Additionally, improved audibility was not related to overall satisfaction with the amplification characteristics of the hearing aid (fitting). However, improved audibility is related to hearing aid use adherence, with patients who achieve better audibility reporting that they use their hearing aids more frequently.

[1]  L E Humes,et al.  Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  H. Fletcher,et al.  The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .

[3]  G A Studebaker.  The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection procedures. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Z Hou,et al.  A Model to Evaluate and Maximize Hearing Aid Performance by Integrating the Articulation Index Across Listening Conditions , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[5]  G Thompson,et al.  Listener preference for selective vs flat amplication for a high-frequency hearing-loss population. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J L Punch,et al.  Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[8]  D Byrne.  Key issues in hearing aid selection and evaluation. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  C V Pavlovic.  Speech spectrum considerations and speech intelligibility predictions in hearing aid evaluations. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[10]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[11]  J L Punch,et al.  Pairwise listener preferences in hearing aid evaluation. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Articulation index predictions of speech intelligibility in hearing aid selection. , 1988, ASHA.

[13]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[14]  R C Seewald,et al.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R M Cox,et al.  Prediction of Hearing Aid Benefit: The Role of Preferred Listening Levels , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[16]  G R Popelka,et al.  Factors which Affect Measures of Speech Audibility with: Hearing Aids , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[17]  D D Dirks,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  H W EWERTSEN,et al.  Hearing aid evaluation. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[19]  L E Humes,et al.  Evaluation of two clinical versions of the articulation index. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[20]  D A Fabry,et al.  Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  Pavlovic Cv.  Articulation index predictions of speech intelligibility in hearing aid selection. , 1988 .

[22]  R M Cox,et al.  A Review of Past Research on Changes in Hearing Aid Benefit over Time , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[23]  P E Souza,et al.  Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  R. M. Cox,et al.  Administration And Application Of The APHAB , 1997 .

[25]  L E Humes,et al.  An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[26]  C M Rankovic,et al.  An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Importance weighted audibility and the recognition of hearing aid-processed speech. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[28]  J. Punch,et al.  Listener-assessed intelligibility of hearing aid-processed speech. , 1977, Journal of the American Auditory Society.

[29]  R M Cox,et al.  Prediction of Benefit from linear Hearing Aids in Nonreverberant Listening Environments , 1993, Ear and hearing.