Evaluating dampening effects of alternative lot-sizing rules to reduce MRP system nervousness

System nervousness in material requirements planning (MRP) has received considerable attention. Although there are different perceptions of system nervousness, it is generally considered as the negative effects of open orders rescheduling. Several methods are suggested to cope with system nervousness. The use of lotsizing rules to cope with MRP system nervousness is investigated here in this paper. Extra inventories need to be carried with most lot-sizing rules, which can be used to accommodate schedule changes. Thus, the nervousness-dampening mechanism is a built-in feature of these lot-sizing rules. The aim of this paper is to focus on the investigation of the effectiveness of using lot-sizing rules to dampen system nervousness in MRP systems by a simulation study. A factorial design was used to examine the dampening effect of various lot-sizing rules considered here. We find that the part-period balancing rule and least total cost rule turn out to be two effective lot-sizing rules to reduce system nervousness.

[1]  R. C. Carlson,et al.  Less Nervous MRP Systems: A Dynamic Economic Lot-Sizing Approach , 1979 .

[2]  Urban Wemmerlöv,et al.  Lot-sizing under uncertainty in a rolling schedule environment , 1984 .

[3]  Dean H. Kropp,et al.  A comparison of strategies to dampen nervousness in MRP systems , 1986 .

[4]  James D. Culley,et al.  Computer Augmented Cases in Operations and Logistics Management , 1973 .

[5]  Emre A. Veral,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE OF A SIMPLE INCREMENTAL LOT‐SIZING RULE IN A MULTILEVEL INVENTORY ENVIRONMENT , 1985 .

[6]  U. Wemmerlöv,et al.  A comparison of discrete, single stage lot-sizing heuristics with special emphasis on rules based on the marginal cost principle , 1982 .

[7]  H Mather,et al.  Reschedule the reschedules you just rescheduled - Way of life for MRP? , 1977 .

[8]  V. Sridharan,et al.  Master production scheduling make-to-stock products: a framework for analysis , 1990 .

[9]  Thomas G. Schmitt.  Resolving uncertainty in manufacturing systems , 1984 .

[10]  William L. Berry,et al.  Open Order Due Date Maintenance in MRP Systems , 1989 .

[11]  Chrwan-Jyh Ho,et al.  An investigation of alternative dampening procedures to cope with MRP system nervousness , 1996 .

[12]  Chrwan-Jyh Ho,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of using lot-sizing rules to cope with MRP system nervousness , 1999 .

[13]  Alan G. Merten,et al.  Computer simulation experiments with models of economic systems , 1971 .

[14]  Everett E. Adam,et al.  Forecasting error evaluation in material requirements planning (MRP) production-inventory systems , 1986 .

[15]  Chrwan-Jyh Ho,et al.  Evaluating the impact of operating environments on MRP system nervousness , 1989 .

[16]  Chrwan-Jyh Ho,et al.  Evaluating the impact of frequent engineering changes on MRP system performance , 1994 .

[17]  D. Clay Whybark,et al.  THE COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION AS A FACTOR IN MRP RESEARCH , 1985 .

[18]  Ralph St. John.  Response to “A note on the evils of lot sizing in MRP” , 1986 .

[19]  Chrwan-Jyh Ho,et al.  Uncertainty-dampening methods for reducing MRP system nervousness , 1995 .

[20]  Jinwoo Park,et al.  A batch splitting method for a job shop scheduling problem in an MRP environment , 1999 .