Material gradients in fibrillar insect attachment systems: the role of joint-like elements.

Insects have developed elaborate fibrillar (or hairy) attachment systems that allow them to attach reliably on a variety of different and unpredictable surfaces. These hairy adhesive pads consist of fine and long surface outgrowths (setae), terminated by thin plate-like tips of different shapes. Besides structural adaptations, recent work revealed material gradients along the length of the setae with spatula-shaped and pointed tip structures. It was shown that these setae have a rigid base and soft setal tips, which is assumed to enhance the adaptability to rough surfaces and prevent clustering of the setae. Here, we show a not yet described type of material gradient found in discoidal (or mushroom-shaped) setae of male leaf beetles. In contrast to the previously shown gradient, the setal tips and the basal and central seta sections are composed of relatively stiff chitinous materials, whereas the transition zones between the central seta sections and the setal tips contain large proportions of the rather soft and elastic protein resilin, forming a joint-like element. Having performed adhesion measurements with artificial macroscopic mushroom-shaped adhesive structures with different implemented joint-like elements, we show that the main functional role of these joint-like elements is to facilitate the adaptability to uneven and non-parallel substrates, rather than to provide detachment tolerance towards pull-off forces applied under various tilt angles.

[1]  Stanislav N Gorb,et al.  Fibrillar adhesion with no clusterisation: Functional significance of material gradient along adhesive setae of insects , 2014, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[2]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[3]  S. Gorb,et al.  Detailed three‐dimensional visualization of resilin in the exoskeleton of arthropods using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2012, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Tarsal setae in Coleoptera , 1976 .

[5]  S N Gorb,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to rough substrates. , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[6]  G. Carbone,et al.  Sticky bio-inspired micropillars: finding the best shape. , 2012, Small.

[7]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[8]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Biologically Inspired Mushroom-Shaped Adhesive Microstructures , 2014 .

[9]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  R. Ruibal,et al.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[11]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Mushroom-shaped geometry of contact elements in biological adhesive systems , 2007 .

[12]  J. Michels,et al.  Assessment of Congo red as a fluorescence marker for the exoskeleton of small crustaceans and the cuticle of polychaetes , 2010, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny , 2001 .

[14]  Jonas O. Wolff,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata on soft substrates , 2016 .

[15]  Chung-Yuen Hui,et al.  Constraints on Microcontact Printing Imposed by Stamp Deformation , 2002 .

[16]  W. Federle,et al.  Elasto-capillarity in insect fibrillar adhesion , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Lars Heepe,et al.  Adhesion failure at 180,000 frames per second: direct observation of the detachment process of a mushroom-shaped adhesive. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[18]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Engineering Micropatterned Dry Adhesives: From Contact Theory to Handling Applications , 2018 .

[19]  Michael Varenberg,et al.  How tight are beetle hugs? Attachment in mating leaf beetles , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[20]  Liangti Qu,et al.  Carbon Nanotube Arrays with Strong Shear Binding-On and Easy Normal Lifting-Off , 2008, Science.

[21]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Soft and Hard Adhesion , 2005 .

[22]  Single macropillars as model systems for tilt angle dependent adhesion measurements , 2012 .

[23]  Michael D. Bartlett,et al.  Scaling normal adhesion force capacity with a generalized parameter. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  S. Gorb,et al.  Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata , 2013, Nature Communications.

[25]  Anand Jagota,et al.  Mechanics of Adhesion Through a Fibrillar Microstructure1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[26]  Walter Federle,et al.  Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae , 2011, Naturwissenschaften.

[27]  J. Robertson,et al.  Influence of packing density and surface roughness of vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes on adhesive properties of gecko-inspired mimetics. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[28]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  Single macroscopic pillars as model system for bioinspired adhesives: influence of tip dimension, aspect ratio, and tilt angle. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[30]  S. Gorb,et al.  Evolution of locomotory attachment pads in the Dermaptera (Insecta). , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[31]  Nicola Pugno,et al.  Spatulate structures in biological fibrillar adhesion , 2010 .

[32]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Adhesion analysis of multi-level hierarchical attachment system contacting with a rough surface , 2007 .

[34]  S. Gorb Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[35]  Stanislav N Gorb,et al.  Spatial model of the gecko foot hair: functional significance of highly specialized non-uniform geometry , 2015, Interface Focus.

[36]  Y. Pelletier,et al.  Specialized tarsal hairs on adult male Colorado potato beetles, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), hamper its locomotion on smooth surfaces , 1987 .

[37]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Adhesion analysis of two-level hierarchical morphology in natural attachment systems for 'smart adhesion' , 2006 .

[38]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera , 1980 .

[40]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Deep UV patterning of acrylic masters for molding biomimetic dry adhesives , 2010 .

[41]  S. Gorb,et al.  Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  Bo N. J. Persson,et al.  On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems , 2003 .

[43]  S. Gorb,et al.  Adhesion tilt-tolerance in bio-inspired mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructure , 2014 .

[44]  S. Gorb,et al.  Tribological properties of vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays , 2015 .

[45]  U. Hiller Untersuchungen zum Feinbau und zur Funktion der Haftborsten von Reptilien , 1968, Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere.

[46]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[47]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Elena Gorb,et al.  Tarsal attachment devices of the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) , 2018, Journal of morphology.

[49]  S. Gorb,et al.  Holding tight to feathers – structural specializations and attachment properties of the avian ectoparasite Crataerina pallida (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) , 2018, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[50]  Jonas O. Wolff,et al.  Attachment Structures and Adhesive Secretions in Arachnids , 2016, Biologically-Inspired Systems.