Comparison of continuous and filter based mass measurements in Mexico City

[1]  Tan Zhu,et al.  Chapter one: exposure measurements. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[2]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of in situ and filter carbon measurements at the Fresno Supersite , 2002 .

[3]  Evaluation of the RAMS Continuous Monitor for Determination of PM2.5 Mass Including Semi-Volatile Material in Philadelphia, PA , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  J. Chow,et al.  Spatial Differences in Outdoor PM10 Mass and Aerosol Composition in Mexico City , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  E Ortiz,et al.  Basic statistics of PM2.5 and PM10 in the atmosphere of Mexico City. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Judith C Chow,et al.  Chemical composition of PM2.5 and PM10 in Mexico City during winter 1997. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Curt M. White,et al.  Sources and composition of PM2.5 at the National Energy Technology Laboratory in Pittsburgh during July and August 2000 , 2002 .

[8]  J. Chow,et al.  Estimating Middle-, Neighborhood-, and Urban-Scale Contributions to Elemental Carbon in Mexico City with a Rapid Response Aethalometer , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  J. Heinrich,et al.  PM25 measurements in ambient aerosol: comparison between Harvard impactor (HI) and the tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) system. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[11]  J C Chow,et al.  Zones of representation for PM10 measurements along the US/Mexico border. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  D. Green,et al.  Evaluation of TEOMTM ‘correction factors’ for assessing the EU Stage 1 limit values for PM10 , 2001 .

[13]  H Patashnick,et al.  Development of a Sample Equilibration System for the TEOM Continuous PM Monitor , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  T. Pless-mulloli,et al.  New Directions: TEOMs and the volatility of UK non-urban PM10: a regulatory dilemma , 2000 .

[15]  J C Chow,et al.  Particulate Air Pollution in Mexico City: A Collaborative Research Project. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  John L. Gras,et al.  TEOM vs. manual gravimetric methods for determination of PM2.5 aerosol mass concentrations , 1999 .

[17]  Field trials of the TEOM® and Partisol for PM10 monitoring in the St Austell china clay area, Cornwall, UK , 1999 .

[18]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Guideline on Speciated Particulate Monitoring , 1998 .

[19]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[20]  J C Chow,et al.  Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. , 1995, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  John G. Watson,et al.  Comparison of PM10 concentrations in high- and medium-volume samplers in a desert environment , 1993, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[22]  T. Cahill,et al.  SEASONAL STUDY OF THE COMPOSITION OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS IN MEXICO CITY , 1991 .

[23]  Harvey Patashnick,et al.  Continuous PM-10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance , 1990 .

[24]  J. Watson.  Chemical element balance receptor model methodology for assessing the sources of fine and total suspended particulate matter in Portland, Oregon , 1979 .