Glazing's techno-economic performance: A comparison of window features in office buildings in different climates

Abstract The use of glass in buildings has a considerable impact both on comfort levels and energy performances, since glazed components protect from external environmental conditions, provides daylighting, view and also ventilation if they are openable. Starting from the second half of the 19th century, the architectural design used to give an increasingly important role to the glass, particularly in non-residential buildings, almost in every kind of climatic conditions. In this context, the present work aims to assess the techno-economic performance of glazing with various thermophysical and optical properties and different glass/wall ratios, coupled with internal/external shading systems, considering the application on an office building in 3 different representative European climates. The obtained results demonstrate that there is a negative impact of solar gains on the yearly energy balance of modern office buildings, where thermally-insulated envelopes enhance overheating even in cold climates. Because of this, the most reasonable solution to decrease the yearly energy consumption is to limit the amount of glazing or to use external solar shading devices. It can be also stated that, under a global-cost perspective, the best cost-effectiveness is achieved using a solar control glazing without any shading. If, however, the cost of discomfort due to glare is accounted, the use of solar shading devices emerges as the most convenient option in all analysed cases.

[1]  Hicham Johra,et al.  Solar shading control strategy for office buildings in cold climate , 2016 .

[2]  Sanja Stevanović,et al.  Parametric study of a cost-optimal, energy efficient office building in Serbia , 2016 .

[3]  Vijay Modi,et al.  Spatial distribution of urban building energy consumption by end use , 2012 .

[4]  Andrea Gasparella,et al.  Analysis and modelling of window and glazing systems energy performance for a well insulated residential building , 2011 .

[5]  Francesco Bianchi,et al.  Thermal and lighting effects of an external venetian blind: Experimental analysis in a full scale test room , 2016 .

[6]  Per Heiselberg,et al.  Control strategies for intelligent glazed façade and their influence on energy and comfort performance of office buildings in Denmark , 2015 .

[7]  Elisa Belloni,et al.  Evaluation of energy, thermal, and daylighting performance of solar control films for a case study in moderate climate , 2015 .

[8]  Ergo Pikas,et al.  Facade design principles for nearly zero energy buildings in a cold climate , 2013 .

[9]  E. Gambao,et al.  Cost-Effective Robots for Façade Cleaning , 2004 .

[10]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  The ‘adaptive zone’ – A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces , 2012 .

[11]  Concettina Marino,et al.  Does window-to-wall ratio have a significant effect on the energy consumption of buildings? A parametric analysis in Italian climate conditions , 2017 .

[12]  Hema Sree Rallapalli A Comparison of Energy Plus and eQUEST Whole Building Energy Simulation Results for a Medium Sized Office Building , 2010 .

[13]  Ergo Pikas,et al.  Cost optimal and nearly zero energy building solutions for office buildings , 2014 .

[14]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[15]  Per Fahlén,et al.  Efficiency of pump operation in hydronic heating and cooling systems , 2004 .

[16]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort , 2012 .

[17]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[18]  Ali Keyhani,et al.  Design Of Smart Power Grid Renewable Energy Systems , 2022 .

[19]  Massimiliano Manfren,et al.  Calibration and uncertainty analysis for computer models – A meta-model based approach for integrated building energy simulation , 2013 .

[20]  Yingxin Zhu,et al.  A study on the effects of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices , 2012 .

[21]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  Cost optimal and nearly zero energy performance requirements for buildings in Estonia , 2013 .

[22]  Massimiliano Manfren,et al.  Thermal inertia and energy efficiency – Parametric simulation assessment on a calibrated case study , 2015 .

[23]  Robert Clear,et al.  Office Worker Response to an Automated Venetian Blind and Electric Lighting System: A Pilot Study , 1998 .

[24]  Theodoros Theodosiou,et al.  The energy performance of windows in Mediterranean regions , 2015 .

[25]  S. Szokolay,et al.  Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design , 2004 .

[26]  Ossama A. Abdou Effects of Luminous Environment on Worker Productivity in Building Spaces , 1997 .

[27]  Samar Jaber,et al.  Thermal and economic windows design for different climate zones , 2011 .

[28]  Berit Time,et al.  Solar shading control strategies in cold climates – Heating, cooling demand and daylight availability in office spaces , 2014 .

[29]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Impact of window selection on the energy performance of residential buildings in South Korea , 2012 .

[30]  Niccolò Aste,et al.  The influence of the external walls thermal inertia on the energy performance of well insulated buildings , 2009 .

[31]  Ilaria Ballarini,et al.  Cost-Optimal Analysis of Italian Office Buildings Through the Application of A Quasi-Steady State Model Validated by Detailed Dynamic Simulation , 2015, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[32]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Impact of façade window design on energy, daylighting and thermal comfort in nearly zero-energy houses , 2015 .

[33]  Michele Zinzi,et al.  Experimental Characterization and Energy Performances of Multiple Glazing Units with Integrated Shading Devices , 2017 .

[34]  Laura Bellia,et al.  Daylight glare: a review of discomfort indexes , 2008 .

[35]  Chris Hope,et al.  The social cost of carbon: implications for modernizing our electricity system , 2013, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[36]  Marina Khoroshiltseva,et al.  A Pareto-based multi-objective optimization algorithm to design energy-efficient shading devices , 2016 .

[37]  Alpin Köknel Yener,et al.  Building envelope design with the objective to ensure thermal, visual and acoustic comfort conditions , 2004 .