A multi‐level, multi‐theory perspective of information technology implementation

Abstract.  Much of information technology (IT) implementation research has focused on individuals' acceptance of IT by examining their behaviour when faced with new IT and the antecedents of these behaviours. As they are frequently undertaken within a project framework, IT implementations also entail the application of project management practices in order to be successful. Based on the premise that antecedents of lower level theories are frequently determined by the outcomes of a higher level theory, the present paper illustrates how organizational‐level decisions, examined from the perspective of economics theories, can help explain the antecedents of project risk management at the project and individual levels. To do so, the paper describes an IT implementation effort which went through three phases; the first two of which were abandoned versions of the same project. An organizational‐level analysis of the case from an economics perspective and its project‐level analysis from a risk management perspective show how organizational‐level decisions influenced the antecedents at the project and individual levels, providing a more complete understanding of the IT implementation in question, an understanding which neither a theory approach nor a level perspective could provide on its own.

[1]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[2]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training , 1990, MIS Q..

[4]  D. Teece Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[5]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Relationships in it outsourcing: a stakeholder perspective , 2000 .

[6]  J. Barney How a Firm's Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions , 1999 .

[7]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[8]  S. Harris,et al.  Creating Readiness for Organizational Change , 1993 .

[9]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Reinterpreting the demise of hierarchy: a case study in information technology, empowerment and incomplete contracts , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  A multiple-theory analysis of a diffusion of information technology case , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Andrew Martin,et al.  A model of information systems development project performance , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[13]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[14]  Henri Barki,et al.  Interpersonal Conflict and Its Management in Information System Development , 2001, MIS Q..

[15]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[16]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[17]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[20]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[21]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  Mark Keil,et al.  The user–developer communication process: a critical case study , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  D. Sappington Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships , 1991 .

[24]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[25]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[26]  Eric T. G. Wang Transaction attributes and software outsourcing success: an empirical investigation of transaction cost theory , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[27]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[29]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Learning failure in information systems development , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  Mark Keil,et al.  How Software Project Risk Affects Project Performance: An Investigation of the Dimensions of Risk and an Exploratory Model , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[31]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[33]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .

[35]  Xin He,et al.  The ERP challenge in China: a resource‐based perspective , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[36]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .