Effectiveness of Two Intensity Levels of Diode Laser in Debonding Metallic Brackets Regarding Enamel Surface Integrity and Pulpal Temperature: An Ex-Vivo Study

Introduction: The traditional methods of deboning metal brackets exert excessive force, resulting in enamel scratches, fractures, and patient discomfort. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using two intensity levels of a diode laser for debonding metallic orthodontic brackets as an alternative to the conventional debonding method. Materials and methods: Sixty intact, extracted human premolar teeth were used in this study, and metal orthodontic brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of these teeth. The teeth were divided into three groups for the experiment: (1) the control group, where conventional bracket debonding was performed using a debonding plier, (2) the first experimental group, where a diode laser (2.5W, 980nm) was utilized for laser debonding, and (3) the second experimental group, where a diode laser (5W, 980nm) was used for laser debonding. The laser was applied using a sweeping movement for 5 seconds. After debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI), the lengths, and the frequency of enamel cracks were compared among the groups. Additionally, an increase in intra-pulpal temperature was measured. Results: In all groups, there were no instances of enamel fractures. Laser debonding resulted in a significant reduction in both the frequency and length of newly formed enamel cracks compared to the conventional debonding method. The laser debonding group exhibited increases in intra-pulpal temperature of 2.37°C and 3.60°C in the second and third groups, respectively. These temperature increases were significantly lower than the threshold of 5.5°C. There were no significant differences observed in the ARI scores among the groups. Conclusion: With all debonding methods, an increase in the length and frequency of enamel cracks should be anticipated. However, laser-assisted debonding of metal brackets offers the advantage of reducing the risk of enamel damage while avoiding thermal damage to the pulp.

[1]  Norma Ab Rahman,et al.  Comparison of Orthodontic Bracket Debonding Force and Bracket Failure Pattern on Different Teeth In Vivo by a Prototype Debonding Device , 2021, BioMed research international.

[2]  A. Braun,et al.  Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Metallic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength and Enamel Surface Morphology. , 2020, Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery.

[3]  Norma Ab Rahman,et al.  Validation and reliability of a prototype orthodontic bracket debonding device equipped with force-sensitive resistor (FSR): a novel method of measuring orthodontic bracket debonding force in vivo , 2019, Progress in orthodontics.

[4]  Norma Ab Rahman,et al.  Assessment of in vivo bond strength studies of the orthodontic bracket-adhesive system: A systematic review , 2018, European Journal of Dentistry.

[5]  M. Dominiak,et al.  Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis. , 2018, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[6]  N. Gutknecht,et al.  The effect of using Er,Cr:YSGG laser in debonding stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study , 2018 .

[7]  J. Arenas-Alatorre,et al.  Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) , 2017, Microscopy research and technique.

[8]  Marzieh Alikhasi,et al.  Laser-Aided Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Comprehensive Review. , 2016, Journal of lasers in medical sciences.

[9]  M. Alam,et al.  The Impact of Surface Preparation on Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement , 2014, Journal of orthodontics.

[10]  D. Nalbantgil,et al.  Pulpal Thermal Changes following Er-YAG Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[11]  M. Alam,et al.  Shear bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes to porcelain , 2013, Dental research journal.

[12]  Farzin Heravi,et al.  Does ultra-pulse CO2 laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets? , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.

[13]  M. Meister,et al.  Diode laser debonding of ceramic brackets. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  D. Kubein-Meesenburg,et al.  Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  Didem Nalbantgil,et al.  Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  T R Katona,et al.  Stresses developed during clinical debonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  N. Mcguinness Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. , 2009 .

[18]  F. Heravi,et al.  The effects of bracket removal on enamel. , 2008, Australian orthodontic journal.

[19]  Chen-Sheng Chen,et al.  Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[20]  J. Mucha,et al.  Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  T. Hooshmand,et al.  Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  S E Bishara,et al.  Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  S E Bishara,et al.  Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  J Artun,et al.  Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[25]  A. Braun,et al.  Effects of 445-nm Diode Laser-Assisted Debonding of Self-Ligating Ceramic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength. , 2018, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[26]  H. Jelínková,et al.  The Use of the Er:YAG Laser for Bracket Debonding and Its Effect on Enamel Damage. , 2016, Photomedicine and laser surgery.