Optimizing Selection and Mating in Genomic Selection with a Look-Ahead Approach: An Operations Research Framework

New genotyping technologies have made large amounts of genotypic data available for plant breeders to use in their efforts to accelerate the rate of genetic gain. Genomic selection (GS) techniques allow breeders to use genotypic data to identify and select, for example, plants predicted to exhibit drought tolerance, thereby saving expensive and limited field-testing resources relative to phenotyping all plants within a population. A major limitation of existing GS approaches is the trade-off between short-term genetic gain and long-term potential. Some approaches focus on achieving short-term genetic gain at the cost of reduced genetic diversity necessary for long-term gains. In contrast, others compromise short-term progress to preserve long-term potential without consideration of the time and resources required to achieve it. Our contribution is to define a new “look-ahead” metric for assessing selection decisions, which evaluates the probability of achieving high genetic gains by a specific time with limited resources. Moreover, we propose a heuristic algorithm to identify optimal selection decisions that maximize the look-ahead metric. Simulation results demonstrate that look-ahead selection outperforms other published selection methods.

[1]  W. Beavis,et al.  The Predicted Cross Value for Genetic Introgression of Multiple Alleles , 2017, Genetics.

[2]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  P. Schnable,et al.  Improving Response in Genomic Selection with a Population-Based Selection Strategy: Optimal Population Value Selection , 2017, Genetics.

[4]  Efficient Breeding by Genomic Mating , 2016 .

[5]  Patrick S. Schnable,et al.  Genetic control of morphometric diversity in the maize shoot apical meristem , 2015, Nature Communications.

[6]  M. McMullen,et al.  Genetic Design and Statistical Power of Nested Association Mapping in Maize , 2008, Genetics.

[7]  B. Hayes,et al.  Mitigation of inbreeding while preserving genetic gain in genomic breeding programs for outbred plants , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[8]  M. Goddard Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response , 2009, Genetica.

[9]  G. Spangenberg,et al.  Selection on Optimal Haploid Value Increases Genetic Gain and Preserves More Genetic Diversity Relative to Genomic Selection , 2015, Genetics.

[10]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  Lizhi Wang,et al.  Three new approaches to genomic selection , 2018, Plant Breeding.

[13]  Robenzon E. Lorenzana,et al.  Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations , 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[14]  Asheesh K. Singh,et al.  Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement , 2018, Heredity.

[15]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[16]  J. Jannink Dynamics of long-term genomic selection , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[17]  A. Lorenz Resource Allocation for Maximizing Prediction Accuracy and Genetic Gain of Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: A Simulation Experiment , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[18]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. , 2010, Briefings in functional genomics.

[19]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[20]  A. Charcosset,et al.  Predicting genomic selection efficiency to optimize calibration set and to assess prediction accuracy in highly structured populations , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[21]  S. Moore,et al.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[22]  B. Kinghorn An algorithm for efficient constrained mate selection , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[23]  L. Varona,et al.  A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[24]  A. C. Sørensen,et al.  Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[25]  J. Hickey,et al.  Optimal cross selection for long-term genetic gain in two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  T. Meuwissen Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[28]  Akihiro Nakaya,et al.  REVIEW: PART OF A HIGHLIGHT ON BREEDING STRATEGIES FOR FORAGE AND GRASS IMPROVEMENT Will genomic selection be a practical method for plant breeding? , 2012 .