Soil Water Tension, a Powerful Measurement for Productivity and Stewardship

A fundamental way to schedule irrigation is through the monitoring and management of soil water tension (SWT). Soil water tension is the force necessary for plant roots to extract water from the soil. With the invention of tensiometers, SWT measurements have been used to schedule irrigation. There are different types of field instruments used to measure SWT, either directly or indirectly. Precise irrigation scheduling by SWT criteria is a powerful method to optimize plant performance. Specific SWT criteria for irrigation scheduling have been developed to optimize the production and quality of vegetable crops, field crops, trees, shrubs, and nursery crops. This review discusses known SWT criteria for irrigation scheduling that vary from 2 to 800 kPa depending on the crop species, plant product to be optimized, environmental conditions, and irrigation system. By using the ideal SWT and adjusting irrigation duration and amount, it is possible to simultaneously achieve high productivity and meet environmental stewardship goals for water use and reduced leaching. Irrigatedhorticultureisessentialforhuman health and welfare. Improved human nutrition can be achieved through improved horticul- tural productivity and quality, which in turn is often related to irrigation practices. Fresh water for horticulture production is increas- ingly in scarce supply and facing competition from alternative water demands from cities, industries, and interest groups that want water left in-stream to support fish and other aquatic organisms. Water quality is also becoming more important. It is widely recognized that precise irrigationisa key tohigh horticultural productivity, efficient water use, and water quality protection.

[1]  J. F. Juárez-López,et al.  Morphological quality of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) ears as response to soil moisture tension and phosphate fertilization in Campeche, Mexico , 2010 .

[2]  Rafael Baker,et al.  Unsaturated soil mechanics: Critical review of physical foundations , 2009 .

[3]  Juan Enciso,et al.  Onion yield and quality response to two irrigation scheduling strategies , 2009 .

[4]  D. Oosterhuis Psychrometry: Accuracy, Interpretation, and Sampling , 2007 .

[5]  Fengxin Wang,et al.  Effects of soil matric potential on potato growth under drip irrigation in the North China Plain , 2007 .

[6]  Yaohu Kang,et al.  Effect of soil matric potential on tomato yield and water use under drip irrigation condition , 2007 .

[7]  W. A. Marouelli,et al.  Water tension thresholds for processing tomatoes under drip irrigation in Central Brazil , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[8]  T. Salo,et al.  Growth and yield of pickling cucumber in different soil moisture circumstances , 2005 .

[9]  Yaohu Kang,et al.  Effect of soil water potential on radish (Raphanus sativus L.) growth and water use under drip irrigation , 2005 .

[10]  S. Kukal,et al.  Soil matric potential-based irrigation scheduling to rice (Oryza sativa) , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[11]  Clinton C. Shock,et al.  Plant Population and Nitrogen Fertilization for Subsurface Drip-irrigated Onion , 2004 .

[12]  P. Paschold,et al.  IRRIGAS - A NEW SIMPLE SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR FOR IRRIGATION SCHEDULING , 2004 .

[13]  Fengxin Wang,et al.  Potato evapotranspiration and yield under different drip irrigation regimes , 2004, Irrigation Science.

[14]  C. Shock,et al.  `Umatilla Russet' and `Russet Legend' Potato Yield and Quality Response to Irrigation , 2003 .

[15]  Clinton C. Shock,et al.  Irrigation Criteria for Drip-irrigated Onions , 2000 .

[16]  R. Yong,et al.  Soil suction and soil-water potentials in swelling clays in engineered clay barriers , 1999 .

[17]  C. Shock,et al.  Taxane and ABA Production in Yew under Different Soil Water Regimes , 1999 .

[18]  C. Shock,et al.  Onion Yield and Quality Affected by Soil Water Potential as Irrigation Threshold , 1998 .

[19]  S. Kaniszewski,et al.  EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION, NITROGEN FERTILIZATION AND SOIL TYPE ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF CAULIFLOWER , 1998 .

[20]  Clinton C. Shock,et al.  Potato Yield and Quality Response to Deficit Irrigation , 1998 .

[21]  C. Shock,et al.  Effects of transitory water stress on potato tuber stem-end reducing sugar and fry color , 1996, American Potato Journal.

[22]  Maria Do Rosario G. Oliveira,et al.  Tomato Root Distribution under Drip Irrigation , 1996 .

[23]  R. Snyder,et al.  Production and water use in lettuces under variable water supply , 1996, Irrigation Science.

[24]  Thomas L. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen and water rates for subsurface trickle-irrigated collard, mustard, and spinach , 1995 .

[25]  C. Shock,et al.  Placement of soil moisture sensors in sprinkler irrigated potatoes , 1995, American Potato Journal.

[26]  B. Sutton,et al.  Maintenance of lettuce root zone at field capacity gives best yields with drip irrigation , 1993 .

[27]  Clinton C. Shock,et al.  The effect of timed water stress on quality, total solids and reducing sugar content of potatoes , 1993, American Potato Journal.

[28]  C. Shock,et al.  Impact of early-season water deficits on Russet Burbank plant development, tuber yield and quality , 1992, American Potato Journal.

[29]  C. Shock,et al.  Plot Sprinklers for Irrigation Research , 1992 .

[30]  J. R. Stansell,et al.  Irrigation Regimes Affect Leaf Yield and Water Turnip Use by Mustard , 1992 .

[31]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Effects of irrigation regimes on the yield and water use of strawberry , 1992, Irrigation Science.

[32]  J. H. Lieth,et al.  Growth Response of Chrysanthemum to Various Container Medium Moisture Tension Levels , 1992 .

[33]  K. Schulbach,et al.  Evaporation pan scheduling: How to reduce water use and maximize yields in greenhouse roses , 1991 .

[34]  J. R. Stansell,et al.  Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and water use by sweetpotato. , 1990 .

[35]  J. Lieth,et al.  Growth of Chrysanthemum Using an Irrigation System Controlled by Soil Moisture Tension , 1989, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[36]  J. R. Stansell,et al.  Effects of Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Water Use of Summer Squash , 1989, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[37]  A. Klute Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[38]  D. Hegde Effect of soil matric potential, method of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on yield, quality, nutrient uptake and water use of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) , 1987, Irrigation Science.

[39]  J. Letey,et al.  Celery Response to Type, Amount, and Method of N-Fertilizer Application under Drip Irrigation1 , 1982 .

[40]  W. Muirhead,et al.  The influence of soil water potential on the flowering pattern, pod set and yield of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) , 1981, Irrigation Science.

[41]  J. R. Stansell,et al.  Effects of Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Water Use of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)1,2 , 1980, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[42]  N. Zieslin,et al.  Effect of different soil moisture regimes and canopy wetting on ‘Baccara’ roses , 1976 .

[43]  A. Maurer RESPONSE OF BROCCOLI TO FIVE SOIL WATER REGIMES , 1976 .

[44]  C. Phene,et al.  High-frequency Irrigation for Water Nutrient Management in Humid Regions1 , 1976 .

[45]  E. Epstein,et al.  Water Stress Relations of the Potato Plant under Field Conditions1 , 1973 .

[46]  M. Renger,et al.  Soil-suction measurements for evaluation of vertical water flow at greater depths with a pressure transducer tensiometer , 1973 .

[47]  H. Timm,et al.  Responses of Potato Plants to Fertilization and Soil Moisture Tension Under Induced Soil Compaction1 , 1966 .

[48]  J. Haddock,et al.  Alfalfa Irrigation for Maximum Seed Production1 , 1959 .

[49]  W. D. Kemper,et al.  UTILIZATION OF AIR PERMEABILITY OF POROUS CERAMICS AS A MEASURE OF HYDRAULIC STRESS IN SOILS , 1958 .

[50]  G. Bouyoucos,et al.  IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PLASTER OF PARIS ABSORPTION BLOCK ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE METHOD FOR MEASURING SOIL MOISTURE UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS , 1947 .

[51]  J. W. Ringler MONITORING THE HYDROLOGY OF SOILS FOR ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS USING MATRIC POTENTIAL SENSORS , 2009 .

[52]  P. Jeranyama Irrigation Water Management , 2009 .

[53]  C. Shock,et al.  Irrigation best management practices for potato , 2008, American Journal of Potato Research.

[54]  Washington L. C. Silva,et al.  Gaseous irrigation control system: descriptionand physical tests for performance assessment , 2006 .

[55]  Steven J. Thomson,et al.  ENGINEERING AND GINNING Calibration and Use of the UGA EASY Evaporation Pan for Low Frequency Sprinkler Irrigation of Cotton in a Clay Soil , 2006 .

[56]  R. Lada,et al.  Water Requirement and Irrigation Management for Optimizing Carrot Yield and Quality , 2004 .

[57]  K. Srinivas,et al.  Plant water relations and nutrient uptake in French bean , 2004, Irrigation Science.

[58]  C. Shock,et al.  Water Requirements and Growth of Irrigated Hybrid Poplar in a Semi-Arid Environment in Eastern Oregon , 2002 .

[59]  Thomas L. Thompson,et al.  Subsurface drip irrigation and fertigation of broccoli: I. yield, quality, and nitrogen uptake , 2002 .

[60]  Clinton C. Shock,et al.  Automation of Subsurface Drip Irrigation for Crop Research , 2002 .

[61]  Thomas L. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen and water interactions in subsurface drip-irrigated cauliflower: I. Plant response. , 2000 .

[62]  T. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen and Water Interactions in Subsurface Drip‐Irrigated Cauliflower II. Agronomic, Economic, and Environmental Outcomes , 2000 .

[63]  C. Shock,et al.  Onion storage decomposition unaffected by late-season irrigation reduction. , 2000 .

[64]  P. Kerkides,et al.  Effects of soil water potential on the nitrate content and the yield of lettuce , 1999 .

[65]  A. G. Smajstrla,et al.  Tensiometer-controlled, drip-irrigation scheduling of tomato , 1996 .

[66]  T. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen and water interactions in subsurface trickle-irrigated leaf lettuce. II: Agronomic, economic, and environmental outcomes , 1996 .

[67]  Thomas L. Thompson,et al.  Nitrogen and Water Interactions in Subsurface Trickle-Irrigated Leaf Lettuce: I. Plant Response , 1996 .

[68]  T. Doerge,et al.  Concurrent evaluation of agronomic, economic, and environmental aspects of trickle-irrigated watermelon production , 1995 .

[69]  T. Doerge,et al.  Nitrogen and Water Interactions in Trickle‐Irrigated Watermelon , 1995 .

[70]  J. R. Stansell,et al.  Irrigation Regimes Affect Cabbage Water Use and Yield , 1994 .

[71]  N. Christensen,et al.  Assessment of irrigation as a method of managing potato early dying. , 1994 .

[72]  T. A. Howell,et al.  Soil Sensor Control of High-Frequency Irrigation Systems , 1984 .

[73]  T. Sammis,et al.  Comparison of sprinkler, trickle, subsurface, and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. , 1980 .

[74]  F. M. Rhoads,et al.  Response of Three Corn Hybrids to Low Levels of Soil Moisture Tension in the Plow Layer 1 , 1973 .

[75]  F. Bingham,et al.  AVOCADO TREE GROWTH RESPONSE TO IRRIGATION , 1962 .