Distinctive signature of indium gallium nitride quantum dot lasing in microdisk cavities

Significance The III-nitride family of materials has already demonstrated tremendous optical efficiency and versatility for devices across a broad range of wavelengths. Quantum dots formed in these materials, with advantages such as improved carrier confinement, should offer even greater device efficiency. They are also important constituents for fundamental studies of light−matter interaction. However, that promise has been far from realized, and this is a complex problem to address. This work, through a comparative study of quantum dot, quantum well, and fragmented quantum well gain media in compact microdisk cavities, allows better understanding of the limitations to lasing for the quantum dot samples. These results allow both improved device efficiency and fundamental insights into quantum dot−cavity interactions in these materials. Low-threshold lasers realized within compact, high-quality optical cavities enable a variety of nanophotonics applications. Gallium nitride materials containing indium gallium nitride (InGaN) quantum dots and quantum wells offer an outstanding platform to study light−matter interactions and realize practical devices such as efficient light-emitting diodes and nanolasers. Despite progress in the growth and characterization of InGaN quantum dots, their advantages as the gain medium in low-threshold lasers have not been clearly demonstrated. This work seeks to better understand the reasons for these limitations by focusing on the simpler, limited-mode microdisk cavities, and by carrying out comparisons of lasing dynamics in those cavities using varying gain media including InGaN quantum wells, fragmented quantum wells, and a combination of fragmented quantum wells with quantum dots. For each gain medium, we use the distinctive, high-quality (Q∼5,500) modes of the cavities, and the change in the highest-intensity mode as a function of pump power to better understand the dominant radiative processes. The variations of threshold power and lasing wavelength as a function of gain medium help us identify the possible limitations to lower-threshold lasing with quantum dot active medium. In addition, we have identified a distinctive lasing signature for quantum dot materials, which consistently lase at wavelengths shorter than the peak of the room temperature gain emission. These findings not only provide better understanding of lasing in nitride-based quantum dot cavity systems but also shed insight into the more fundamental issues of light−matter coupling in such systems.

[1]  Trevor M. Benson,et al.  Trends in microdisk laser research and linear optical modelling , 2007 .

[2]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  InGaN quantum dots grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy employing a post-growth nitrogen anneal , 2003 .

[3]  Pallab Bhattacharya,et al.  Continuous-wave operation and differential gain of InGaN/GaN quantum dot ridge waveguide lasers (λ = 420 nm) on c-plane GaN substrate , 2012 .

[4]  W. A. Phillips,et al.  The impact of gross well width fluctuations on the efficiency of GaN-based light emitting diodes , 2013 .

[5]  M. Asada,et al.  Gain and the threshold of three-dimensional quantum-box lasers , 1986 .

[6]  Marc Ilegems,et al.  Visible InGaN/GaN Quantum-Dot Materials and Devices , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Igor Aharonovich,et al.  Low threshold, room-temperature microdisk lasers in the blue spectral range , 2012, 1208.6452.

[8]  D. Bimberg,et al.  Localization induced electron‐hole transition rate enhancement in GaAs quantum wells , 1984 .

[9]  R. Taylor,et al.  Nitride‐based quantum dots for single photon source applications , 2009 .

[10]  Catalano,et al.  Room temperature lasing at blue wavelengths in gallium nitride microcavities , 1999, Science.

[11]  Dirk Reuter,et al.  Lasing properties of non-polar GaN quantum dots in cubic aluminum nitride microdisk cavities , 2013 .

[12]  P. Bhattacharya,et al.  A InGaN/GaN quantum dot green (λ=524 nm) laser , 2011 .

[13]  Andreas Stintz,et al.  Cavity Q, mode volume, and lasing threshold in small diameter AlGaAs microdisks with embedded quantum dots. , 2006, Optics express.

[14]  Guang Zhu,et al.  Gallium nitride nanowire based nanogenerators and light-emitting diodes. , 2012, ACS nano.

[15]  C. Humphreys,et al.  Control of the oscillator strength of the exciton in a single InGaN-GaN quantum dot. , 2007, Physical Review Letters.

[16]  Y. Arakawa,et al.  Room-temperature triggered single photon emission from a III-nitride site-controlled nanowire quantum dot. , 2014, Nano letters.

[17]  C. Humphreys,et al.  Role of gross well-width fluctuations in bright, green-emitting single InGaN∕GaN quantum well structures , 2007 .

[18]  Kelly P. Knutsen,et al.  Single gallium nitride nanowire lasers , 2002, Nature materials.

[19]  Shuji Nakamura,et al.  Role of self-formed InGaN quantum dots for exciton localization in the purple laser diode emitting at 420 nm , 1997 .

[20]  Peter Michler,et al.  Laser emission from quantum dots in microdisk structures , 2000 .

[21]  Yasuhiko Arakawa,et al.  Room temperature continuous wave lasing in InAs quantum-dot microdisks with air cladding. , 2005, Optics express.

[22]  C. Humphreys,et al.  Growth and assessment of InGaN quantum dots in a microcavity: A blue single photon source , 2008 .

[23]  Philippe Boucaud,et al.  Aluminum nitride photonic crystals and microdiscs for ultra-violet nanophotonics , 2014 .

[24]  I. Krestnikov,et al.  Quantum dot origin of luminescence in InGaN-GaN structures , 2002 .

[25]  T. Bretagnon,et al.  High quality factor nitride-based optical cavities: microdisks with embedded GaN/Al(Ga)N quantum dots. , 2011, Optics letters.

[26]  Shuji Nakamura,et al.  Room-temperature continuous-wave lasing in GaN/InGaN microdisks , 2007 .