Single Task Versus Multi-task Learning

This experiment examined contextual interference in producing a bimanual coordination pattern of 90° relative phase. Acquisition, retention, and transfer performance were compared in a single-task control group and groups that performed 2 tasks in either a blocked or random presentation. Surprisingly, acquisition data revealed that both the random and control groups outperformed the blocked group. Retention data showed a typical CI effect for performance variability, with the random group outperforming the blocked group. Neither the random nor blocked groups outperformed the control group, suggesting interference of a second task may be as beneficial to learning as extra practice on the initial task. No group effects were found during transfer performance. Results suggest that random practice is beneficial for learning only one task.Key Words: contextual interference, specificity, multi-task task learning

[1]  R. Magill,et al.  Variability of Practice and Contextual Interference in Motor Skill Learning. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Consistency and error in motor performance , 1982 .

[3]  Terry A. Ackerman,et al.  Statistics for Behavioral Sciences , 1990 .

[4]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  John B. Shea,et al.  Context Effects in Memory and Learning Movement Information , 1983 .

[6]  T. D. Lee,et al.  Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[8]  T. Jarus,et al.  Effects of Contextual Interference and Age on Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of Motor Skill , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  T D Lee,et al.  Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual coordination. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  S. P. Swinnen,et al.  Relative Phase Alterations During Bimanual Skill Acquisition. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  P. Shewokis,et al.  A test of retroactive inhibition as an explanation of contextual interference. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[12]  K. Simpson,et al.  Does retroactive inhibition influence contextual interference effects? , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[13]  J. Kelso,et al.  Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: collective and component levels. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J. Kelso.  Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  Investigation of the Contextual Interference Effect in the Manipulation of the Motor Parameter of Over-All Force , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  Polemnia G. Amazeen,et al.  Is Dynamics the Content of a Generalized Motor Program for Rhythmic Interlimb Coordination? , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  T. D. Lee,et al.  Contextual interference in movements of the same class: differential effects on program and parameter learning. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  F. Brady.  A Theoretical and Empirical Review of the Contextual Interference Effect and the Learning of Motor Skills , 1998 .

[19]  T D Lee,et al.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. , 1997, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[20]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[21]  P. Rey.  Training and Contextual Interference Effects on Memory and Transfer , 1989 .

[22]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[23]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[24]  M Whitehurst,et al.  The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills. , 1982, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  J. Kelso,et al.  A quantitative approach to understanding the formation and change of coordinated movement patterns. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Attention focusing instructions and coordination bias : implications for learning a novel bimanual task , 2000 .

[27]  R. Magill,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN MOTOR SKILL ACQUISITION , 1990 .

[28]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions , 1997 .

[29]  R. Magill,et al.  Can Forgetting Facilitate Skill Acquisition , 1985 .

[30]  Timothy D. Lee.  Chapter 7 Transfer-Appropriate Processing: A Framework for Conceptualizing Practice Effects in Motor Learning , 1988 .

[31]  J. Kelso,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992 .

[32]  C. Shea,et al.  Specificity and variability of practice. , 1990, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[33]  C H Shea,et al.  Composition of practice: influence on the retention of motor skills. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[34]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  The Coordination Dynamics of Learning: Theoretical Structure and Experimental Agenda , 1994 .

[35]  M. HenryF.,et al.  Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill , 1968 .