Imagining climate resilient futures: A layered Delphi panel approach

[1]  C. Harris,et al.  Reimagining Democracy in an Era of Deep Transition , 2022, Irish Studies in International Affairs.

[2]  E. Byrne,et al.  Participatory methods in energy system modelling and planning – A review , 2021 .

[3]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Climate policy models need to get real about people — here’s how , 2021, Nature.

[4]  A. Sobel Usable climate science is adaptation science , 2021, Climatic Change.

[5]  Edmond Byrne,et al.  An innovative approach for estimating energy demand and supply to inform local energy transitions , 2021, Energy.

[6]  J. Herbert The socio‐ecological imagination: Young environmental activists constructing transformation in an era of crisis , 2021, Area.

[7]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  The Objectives of Stakeholder Involvement in Transdisciplinary Research. A Conceptual Framework for a Reflective and Reflexive Practise , 2020 .

[8]  J. Weaver,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry in the Wake of Science Studies: Transdisciplinary Pursuits in Times of Climate Change, Information Flows, and Fading Democracies , 2020, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies.

[9]  A. Froese,et al.  Failure through Success: Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development , 2020, Science, Technology, & Human Values.

[10]  A. Åberg,et al.  Crises and Technological Futures: Experiences, Emotion, and Action , 2020, Technology and culture.

[11]  B. Lennon,et al.  Beyond Forecasting: Using a Modified Delphi Method to Build Upon Participatory Action Research in Developing Principles for a Just and Inclusive Energy Transition , 2020 .

[12]  U. Pesch Elusive publics in energy projects: The politics of localness and energy democracy , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[13]  Tania Allen Creating resilient futures , 2019, Solving Critical Design Problems.

[14]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Mapping participation: A systematic analysis of diverse public participation in the UK energy system , 2019, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space.

[15]  C. Bezold The History and Future of Anticipatory Democracy and Foresight , 2018, World Futures Review.

[16]  Melissa S. Williams Everyday talk in the deliberative system (1999) , 2018 .

[17]  Stina Ellevseth Oseland,et al.  Transformative social science? Modes of engagement in climate and energy solutions , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[18]  Stephen Flood,et al.  Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[19]  Maeve Henchion,et al.  Consensus, caveats and conditions: International learnings for bioeconomy development , 2018 .

[20]  A. Meadow,et al.  A Path to Actionable Climate Science: Perspectives from the Field , 2018, Environmental Management.

[21]  Lisa Melander,et al.  Scenario development in transport studies: Methodological considerations and reflections on delphi studies , 2017 .

[22]  O. Escobar Pluralism and Democratic Participation: What Kind of Citizen are Citizens Invited to be? , 2017 .

[23]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[24]  P. Beier,et al.  A How‐to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science , 2017 .

[25]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Disengaging citizens? Climate change communication and public receptivity , 2017 .

[26]  C. Hinrichs,et al.  Bioenergy experts and their imagined “obligatory publics” in the United States: Implications for public engagement and participation , 2017 .

[27]  Hannah R. Parker,et al.  Using a Game to Engage Stakeholders in Extreme Event Attribution Science , 2016, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.

[28]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Climate Change Communication in Ireland , 2016 .

[29]  Teppo Hujala,et al.  Policy experts' propensity to change their opinion along Delphi rounds , 2016 .

[30]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Mapping divergent concepts of sustainability: lay knowledge, local practices and environmental governance , 2016 .

[31]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse , 2016 .

[32]  Oliver M. Brandes,et al.  Introducing Resilience Practice to Watershed Groups: What Are the Learning Effects? , 2016 .

[33]  J. Butler,et al.  Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Adaptation Planning to Build Adaptive Capacity: A Structured Learning Approach , 2015 .

[34]  L. Bracken,et al.  Transdisciplinary research: understanding the stakeholder perspective , 2015 .

[35]  Barbara Ribeiro,et al.  Transitions in biofuel technologies: : An appraisal of the social impacts of cellulosic ethanol using the Delphi method , 2015 .

[36]  Mark Scott,et al.  Contending Expertise: An Interpretive Approach to (Re)conceiving Wind Power's ‘Planning Problem’ , 2015 .

[37]  Constanze Haug,et al.  Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation , 2014 .

[38]  Johanna Orvokki Mustelin,et al.  Strategies for improving adaptation practice in developing countries , 2014 .

[39]  M. Polk Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[40]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[41]  P. Marchand,et al.  Forecasting the deployment of short-rotation intensive culture of willow or hybrid poplar: Insights from a Delphi study , 2014 .

[42]  Klaus Eisenack,et al.  A Climate Change Board Game for Interdisciplinary Communication and Education , 2013 .

[43]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization , 2012 .

[44]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[45]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK , 2012 .

[46]  Gene Rowe,et al.  The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue☆ , 2011 .

[47]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Is diversity in Delphi panelist groups useful? Evidence from a French forecasting exercise on the future of nuclear energy , 2011 .

[48]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi: A brief look backward and forward , 2011 .

[49]  Jon Barrutia,et al.  Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts , 2011 .

[50]  Vilja Varho,et al.  The unholy marriage? Integrating qualitative and quantitative information in Delphi processes , 2011 .

[51]  U. Felt,et al.  Slim Futures and the Fat Pill: Civic Imaginations of Innovation and Governance in an Engagement Setting , 2011 .

[52]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change: Imagined Subjectivities of ‘the Public’ and Their Implications , 2010 .

[53]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment , 2008 .

[54]  S. Niemeyer,et al.  The Ends of Deliberation: Meta‐consensus and Inter‐subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes , 2007 .

[55]  Mark Garavan Resisting the costs of ‘development’: local environmental activism in Ireland , 2007 .

[56]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[57]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[58]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[59]  L. Nader Barriers to thinking new about energy , 1981 .

[60]  R. O’Gorman Climate Law in Ireland: EU and National Dimensions , 2020 .

[61]  Conor Little The Party Politics of Climate Change in Ireland , 2020 .

[62]  J. Sweeney Climate Change in Ireland: Science, Impacts and Adaptation , 2020 .

[63]  M. Polk Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving , 2015 .

[64]  Nelya Koteyko,et al.  Theory and language of climate change communication , 2010 .

[65]  George Wright,et al.  Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique , 2001 .