Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics

Objective: To investigate the impact of upper extremity deficit in subjects with tetraplegia.Setting: The United Kingdom and The Netherlands.Study design: Survey among the members of the Dutch and UK Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Associations.Main outcome parameter: Indication of expected improvement in quality of life (QOL) on a 5-point scale in relation to improvement in hand function and seven other SCI-related impairments.Results: In all, 565 subjects with tetraplegia returned the questionnaire (overall response of 42%). Results in the Dutch and the UK group were comparable. A total of 77% of the tetraplegics expected an important or very important improvement in QOL if their hand function improved. This is comparable to their expectations with regard to improvement in bladder and bowel function. All other items were scored lower.Conclusion: This is the first study in which the impact of upper extremity impairment has been assessed in a large sample of tetraplegic subjects and compared to other SCI-related impairments that have a major impact on the life of subjects with SCI. The present study indicates a high impact as well as a high priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics.

[1]  Functional significance of spinal cord lesion level. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Long Ci,et al.  Functional significance of spinal cord lesion level. , 1955 .

[3]  E. Moberg,et al.  Surgical treatment for absent single-hand grip and elbow extension in quadriplegia. Principles and preliminary experience. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  Hanson Rw,et al.  Sexual loss in relation to other functional losses for spinal cord injured males. , 1976 .

[5]  O.B.E. O.ST.J. Hon. M.D. M.S. D.P.R.M. F.R.C.S. F.R.A.C.S George M. Bedbrook Kt..  The Care and Management of Spinal Cord Injuries , 1981, Springer New York.

[6]  Management of the upper extremity in traumatic tetraplegia. , 1988 .

[7]  Management of the upper extremity in traumatic tetraplegia. , 1988, Hand clinics.

[8]  B R Johnstone,et al.  A review of surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb in quadriplegia , 1988, Paraplegia.

[9]  Michael W. Keith,et al.  Surgical Rehabilitation of the Tetraplegic Upper Extremity , 1991 .

[10]  J. Danesh,et al.  Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in New Zealand. , 1993, Neuroepidemiology.

[11]  M. Curtin,et al.  Development of a tetraplegic hand assessment and splinting protocol , 1994, Paraplegia.

[12]  R. Andersen.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[13]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Tendon transfers and functional electrical stimulation for restoration of hand function in spinal cord injury. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Outcome measurement in economic evaluation. , 1996, Health economics.

[15]  R. Waters,et al.  Functional hand surgery following tetraplegia. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  R R Betz,et al.  Challenges to clinical deployment of upper limb neuroprostheses. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  L. Harvey.  Principles of conservative management for a non-orthotic tenodesis grip in tetraplegics. , 1996, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[18]  Patient selection for an upper extremity neuroprosthesis in tetraplegic individuals , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[19]  Marcel Dijkers,et al.  Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[20]  J. Broton,et al.  Perceived difficulty in dealing with consequences of spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  J. Ditunno.  The John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Predicting recovery after spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation imperative. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  A. Meyers,et al.  Health-related quality of life outcomes measures. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  A J Thompson,et al.  A questionnaire assessment of unmet needs for rehabilitation services and resources for people with multiple sclerosis: results of a pilot survey in five European countries , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[25]  G. Snoek,et al.  Use of the NESS Handmaster to restore handfunction in tetraplegia: clinical experiences in ten patients , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[26]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: a multicenter study. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  J Crosbie,et al.  Hand function of C6 and C7 tetraplegics 1–16 years following injury , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[28]  D. Feeny,et al.  Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States , 2001 .

[29]  M. Ryan,et al.  Using choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future challenges , 2001 .

[30]  D. Amsters,et al.  The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[31]  Steven Kirshblum,et al.  Spinal Cord Medicine , 2001 .

[32]  H. Seelen,et al.  Evaluation of upper extremity motor function tests in tetraplegics , 2002, Spinal Cord.

[33]  L. May,et al.  Measuring quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: external and structural validity , 2002, Spinal Cord.