The role of pause as a prosodic boundary marker: Language ERP studies in German 3- and 6-year-olds

Spoken language is hierarchically structured into prosodic units divided by prosodic breaks. The largest prosodic breaks in an utterance are intonational phrase boundaries (IPBs), which are defined by three acoustic cues, namely, pitch change, preboundary lengthening, and pausing. Previous studies have revealed that the electrophysiological marker of IPB perception, the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), is established between 2 and 3 years of age. Here, we examined the neural activity underlying IPB perception in children by targeting their reliance on pausing; hypothesized to be a key boundary cue in German. To evaluate the role of pausing, we tested IPB perception without the boundary pause, but with pitch change and preboundary lengthening. We tested children at the age of 3 years, when the CPS in response to IPBs has just emerged, and at 6 years, when language abilities are further developed. Results revealed that 6-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, show the CPS in response to IPBs without full prosodic marking. These results indicate developmental differences with respect to the role of pausing as a prosodic boundary cue in German. The correlation of children's IPB perception and their syntactic abilities further corroborates the close prosody-syntax interaction in children's advancing ability to process phrase structure.

[1]  Beula M. Magimairaj,et al.  Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Prosodic Breaks in Sentence Processing Investigated by Event-Related Potentials , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[3]  D. Gentner,et al.  Relational language and the development of relational mapping , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Clause Segmentation by 6-Month-Old Infants: A Crosslinguistic Perspective , 2008 .

[5]  Nico Willems English intonation from a Dutch point of view , 1982 .

[6]  A. Butcher Aspects of the Speech Pause: Phonetic Correlates and Communication Functions , 1981 .

[7]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  Developing Cognitive Control , 2012, Current directions in psychological science.

[8]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[9]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Sentence processing in the visual and auditory modality: Do comma and prosodic break have parallel functions? , 2008, Brain Research.

[10]  Kimberly Andrews Espy,et al.  Using Path Analysis to Understand Executive Function Organization in Preschool Children , 2004, Developmental neuropsychology.

[11]  Ulrich Müller,et al.  The development of executive function in early childhood: I. The development of executive function. , 2003 .

[12]  Shari R Baum,et al.  Temporal parameters as cues to phrasal boundaries: A comparison of processing by left- and right-hemisphere brain-damaged individuals , 2003, Brain and Language.

[13]  S. Speer,et al.  Situationally independent prosodic phrasing , 2011 .

[14]  A. Christophe,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases , 1994, Cognition.

[16]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Effects of Cooperating and Conflicting Prosody in Spoken English Garden Path Sentences: ERP Evidence for the Boundary Deletion Hypothesis , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Claudia Männel,et al.  Pauses and Intonational Phrasing: ERP Studies in 5-month-old German Infants and Adults , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  L. Streeter Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  E. Lettich,et al.  Modified nomenclature for the "10%" electrode system. , 1988, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[21]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992,45A (1) 73-87 Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2022 .

[22]  A. Friederici,et al.  Intonational phrase structure processing at different stages of syntax acquisition: ERP studies in 2-, 3-, and 6-year-old children. , 2011, Developmental science.

[23]  A. Seidl Infants’ use and weighting of prosodic cues in clause segmentation , 2007 .

[24]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-driven Sentence Processing: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Grice,et al.  The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements , 2006, Cognition.

[26]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Syntax and Speech , 1980 .

[27]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Durational cues to word boundaries in clear speech , 1990, Speech Commun..

[28]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[29]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation , 1991 .

[30]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Discourse, Syntax, and Prosody: The Brain Reveals an Immediate Interaction , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  E. Grabe,et al.  Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities , 1995 .

[32]  A. Seidl,et al.  Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. , 2008, Developmental science.

[33]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese , 2008, Brain and Language.

[34]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[35]  E. Lettich,et al.  Modified Nomenclature for the “10%” Electrode System1 , 1988 .

[36]  M. Tomasello,et al.  German children use prosody to identify participant roles in transitive sentences , 2011 .

[37]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The pragmatic meanings conveyed by function words in Chinese sentences: An ERP study , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[38]  Maria Schubiger,et al.  English Intonation and German Modal Particles – A Comparative Study , 1965 .

[39]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  D. Amso,et al.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Thomas F. Nugent,et al.  Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  M. Markus English and German Prosody: A Contrastive Comparison , 2006 .

[43]  S. Bunge,et al.  Neurodevelopmental changes in working memory and cognitive control , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[45]  John R. Williams The Declaration of Helsinki and public health. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[46]  Bill Wells,et al.  Intonation development from five to thirteen , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[47]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[48]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Interplay between Prosody and Syntax in Sentence Processing: The Case of Subject- and Object-control Verbs , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Regine Oberecker,et al.  Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance. , 2012, Developmental science.

[50]  S. M. Carlson Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[51]  G. Szagun Sprachentwicklung beim Kind , 2006 .

[52]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Language acquisition : the growth of grammar , 2002 .