A decision model for blockchain applicability into knowledge-based conversation system

Abstract Conversation systems usually suffer from the challenge of knowledge management from multiple human experts. The current mechanism used in knowledge-based conversation system is always based on centralized servers, which may be problematic in terms of transparency and security. Blockchain solutions are currently being proposed improve the security and efficiency in different domains. However, there are various blockchain platforms with different characteristics, and conversation system implemented using blockchain platform is not in place yet. In this paper, we clearly identified the requirement analysis of knowledge-based conversation system and present a decision model for identify the best fitting blockchain platform for knowledge-based conversation system. In the proposed method, multiple measurements including Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), and Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) are utilized to analyze and create consistent result together, which can be used for the selection of blockchain platforms and improve the efficiency of the decision-making process.

[1]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A New Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application to Vendor Selection Problem , 2013, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[2]  Ilke Bereketli,et al.  Criteria Weighting for Blockchain Software Selection Using Fuzzy AHP , 2020 .

[3]  Long Wang,et al.  Recent Advances in Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems: A Brief Survey , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  An inquiry dialogue system , 2008, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[5]  Sunghyun Cho,et al.  A Survey of Scalability Solutions on Blockchain , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).

[6]  Alexander Styhre Knowledge Sharing in Professions: Roles and Identity in Expert Communities , 2011 .

[7]  Eric P. Xing,et al.  Target-Guided Open-Domain Conversation , 2019, ACL.

[8]  Wattana Viriyasitavat,et al.  Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes , 2019, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[9]  Jiahuan Pei,et al.  A Modular Task-oriented Dialogue System Using a Neural Mixture-of-Experts , 2019, ArXiv.

[10]  Beng Chin Ooi,et al.  BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains , 2017, SIGMOD Conference.

[11]  Murat Çolak,et al.  A multi-criteria evaluation model based on hesitant fuzzy sets for blockchain technology in supply chain management , 2020, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  M. Inmaculada García Sáez,et al.  Blockchain-Enabled Platforms: Challenges and Recommendations , 2020, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[13]  K. Blind,et al.  Born Global Market Dominators and Implications for the Blockchain Avantgarde , 2021, Research Anthology on Blockchain Technology in Business, Healthcare, Education, and Government.

[14]  Peter Henderson,et al.  Ethical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systems , 2017, AIES.

[15]  Davor Maček,et al.  Comparisons of Bitcoin Cryptosystem with Other Common Internet Transaction Systems by AHP Technique , 2017 .

[16]  Jiliang Tang,et al.  A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontiers , 2017, SKDD.

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[18]  Fatih Kurugollu,et al.  CRT-BIoV: A Cognitive Radio Technique for Blockchain-Enabled Internet of Vehicles , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[20]  Mario Zagar,et al.  Comparative analysis of blockchain consensus algorithms , 2018, 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO).

[21]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[22]  Bela Gipp,et al.  On-chain vs. off-chain storage for supply- and blockchain integration , 2018, it - Information Technology.

[23]  Stefan Tai,et al.  On or Off the Blockchain? Insights on Off-Chaining Computation and Data , 2017, ESOCC.

[24]  Yanfeng Li,et al.  Blockchain Service Provider Selection Based on an Integrated BWM-Entropy-TOPSIS Method Under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment , 2020, IEEE Access.

[25]  Sandi Rahmadika,et al.  Security Analysis on the Decentralized Energy Trading System Using Blockchain Technology , 2018, Jurnal Online Informatika.

[26]  Byeong Ho Kang,et al.  A Survey on Blockchain-Based Internet Service Architecture: Requirements, Challenges, Trends, and Future , 2019, IEEE Access.

[27]  J. Crisp,et al.  The Delphi method? , 1997, Nursing research.

[28]  Masahiro Shibata,et al.  Dialog System for Open-Ended Conversation Using Web Documents , 2009, Informatica.

[29]  Carsten Maple,et al.  Selecting Effective Blockchain Solutions , 2018, Euro-Par Workshops.

[30]  Tsung-Ting Kuo,et al.  Comparison of blockchain platforms: a systematic review and healthcare examples , 2019, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Anamika Chauhan,et al.  Blockchain and Scalability , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C).

[32]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Decision Support for Blockchain Platform Selection: Three Industry Case Studies , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[33]  Long Wang,et al.  Consensus of Hybrid Multi-Agent Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[34]  Klaus D. Goepel,et al.  Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process - A New Approach , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..