Advancing understanding using Nonaka’s model of knowledge creation and problem-based learning

Nonaka’s model of knowledge creation can provide guidance for designing learning environments and activities. However, Bereiter is critical of the model because it does not address whether understanding is deepened in the process of socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. To address this issue of understanding, this paper proposed a framework that synthesizes the basic phases of problem-based learning with Nonaka’s model. This paper reports on a study investigating if a course designed based on this authentic framework can help to stimulate knowledge creation based on deepening understanding. Several types of data were collected in this design-based research, namely: reflections by the participants and instructor; group discussions; student-created artifacts; and documents, records and artifacts that reflect the overall design of the course. The findings suggest that the participants demonstrated advancing understanding amidst knowledge creating conditions and processes consistent with Nonaka’s model. Other key implications are also discussed.

[1]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Differential Student Attrition and Differential Exposure Mask Effects of Problem-Based Learning in Curriculum Comparison Studies , 2012, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[3]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Teachers Learning Technology by Design , 2005 .

[4]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[5]  Shuh Shing Lee,et al.  From socialisation to internalisation: Cultivating technological pedagogical content knowledge through problem-based learning , 2011 .

[6]  A. Sfard On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[7]  C. Hmelo‐Silver Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[8]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[9]  R. Sternberg What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[10]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[11]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[12]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge , 2003 .

[13]  Meng Yew Tee,et al.  Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[14]  A. Collins,et al.  Cognition and learning. , 1996 .

[15]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[16]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[17]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[19]  Feng Wang,et al.  Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments , 2005 .

[20]  P. Winne,et al.  Handbook of educational psychology , 2015 .

[21]  T. Hammond,et al.  Giving, Prompting, Making: Aligning Technology and Pedagogy Within TPACK for Social Studies Instruction , 2009 .