Optimal detectors for multi-target environments

The matched filter is known to be the optimal detector for a single target with known impulse response in white noise. However, many radar systems operate in multi-target environments, for which the matched filter is suboptimal due to modeling mismatch of the background signal. In this paper, we study the hypothesis testing problem of detecting a target at a given range cell while modeling all targets at other range cells as a correlated background process. We consider both deterministic-unknown and random amplitude target models, and derive the corresponding optimal detectors. For the deterministic-unknown signal model, we show that special cases of the optimal detector reduce to ridge regression (a classical solution for inverse problems), sidelobe suppression (a heuristic solution for target detection in multi-target environments), or adaptive pulse compression. The detector resulting from the random amplitude signal model reduces to that of the deterministic signal model for targets modeled as occupying a single range cell. Range-Doppler extension are given. We illustrate the performance of the detector using simulated data and the civilian vehicle data dome set.

[1]  S. Blunt,et al.  Adaptive pulse compression via MMSE estimation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  Shannon D. Blunt,et al.  A novel pulse compression scheme based on minimum mean-square error reiteration [radar signal processing] , 2003, 2003 Proceedings of the International Conference on Radar (IEEE Cat. No.03EX695).

[3]  Peter J. Collins,et al.  Development and evaluation of a multistatic ultrawideband random noise radar network , 2011, 2011 IEEE RadarCon (RADAR).

[4]  S. Kay,et al.  Optimal Signal Design for Detection of Gaussian Point Targets in Stationary Gaussian Clutter/Reverberation , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[5]  Emre Ertin,et al.  A software defined radar system for joint communication and sensing , 2011, 2011 IEEE RadarCon (RADAR).

[6]  S Matteoli,et al.  A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images , 2010, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[7]  R.L. Fante,et al.  Phase-coded waveforms for radar , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  A. W. Rihaczek Optimum Filters for Signal Detection in Clutter , 1965, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[10]  J. Palmer,et al.  Illuminator of Opportunity Bistatic Radar research at DSTO , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Radar.

[11]  Dante C. Youla,et al.  Optimum transmit-receiver design in the presence of signal-dependent interference and channel noise , 1999, Conference Record of the Thirty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (Cat. No.CH37020).

[12]  Shi Xing Adaptive Pulse Compression Repair Processing via MSN Criteria , 2010 .

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[14]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[15]  S.U. Pillai,et al.  Waveform design optimization using bandwidth and energy considerations , 2008, 2008 IEEE Radar Conference.

[16]  Joseph R. Guerci,et al.  Optimum transmit-receiver design in the presence of signal-dependent interference and channel noise , 1999 .