Externalities in online advertising

Most models for online advertising assume that an advertiser's value from winning an ad auction, which depends on the clickthrough rate or conversion rate of the advertisement, is independent of other advertisements served alongside it in the same session. This ignores an important 'externality effect': as the advertising audience has a limited attention span, a high-quality ad on a page can detract attention from other ads on the same page. That is, the utility to a winner in such an auction also depends on the set of other winners. In this paper, we introduce the problem of modeling externalities in online advertising, and study the winner determination problem in these models. Our models are based on choice models on the audience side. We show that in the most general case, the winner determination problem is hard even to approximate. However, we give an approximation algorithm for this problem with an approximation factor that is logarithmic in the ratio of the maximum to the minimum bid. Furthermore, we show that there are some interesting special cases, such as the case where the audience preferences are single peaked, where the problem can be solved exactly in polynomial time. For all these algorithms, we prove that the winner determination algorithm can be combined with VCG-style payments to yield truthful mechanisms.

[1]  Arild Stubhaug Acta Mathematica , 1886, Nature.

[2]  Yves Sprumont The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule , 1991 .

[3]  Philippe Jehiel,et al.  Strategic Non-Participation , 1994 .

[4]  E. Stacchetti,et al.  How (not) to sell nuclear weapons , 1996 .

[5]  Johan Håstad,et al.  Clique is hard to approximate within n/sup 1-/spl epsiv// , 1996, Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science.

[6]  E. Stacchetti,et al.  Multidimensional Mechanism Design for Auctions with Externalities , 1999 .

[7]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Efficient Design with Interdependent Valuations , 2001 .

[8]  Jonas Holmerin,et al.  Clique Is Hard to Approximate within n1-o(1) , 2000, ICALP.

[9]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[10]  W. Gaertner Chapter 3 Domain restrictions , 2002 .

[11]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  Anshul Kothar,et al.  Approximately-strategyproof and tractable multi-unit auctions , 2003 .

[13]  Subhash Suri,et al.  Approximately-strategyproof and tractable multi-unit auctions , 2003, EC '03.

[14]  Marc T. Law,et al.  The Political Economy of , 2006 .

[15]  Filip Radlinski,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search , 2007, TOIS.

[16]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Improving Diversity in Ranking using Absorbing Random Walks , 2007, NAACL.

[17]  Atri Rudra,et al.  Approximating Matches Made in Heaven , 2009, ICALP.