Agreement, Disputes and Commitments in Dialogue

This paper provides a logically precise analysis of agreement and disputes in dialogue. The semantics distinguishes among the public commitments of each dialogue agent, including commitments to relational speech acts or rhetorical relations (e.g. Narration, Explanation and Correction). Agreement is defined to be the shared entailments of the agents' public commitments. We show that this makes precise predictions about implicit agreement. The theory also provides a consistent interpretation of disputes and models what content is agreed upon when a dispute has taken place.

[1]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit , 2000, Natural Language Engineering.

[2]  Jan van Eijck,et al.  Representing Discourse in Context , 1997, Handbook of Logic and Language.

[3]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[4]  Joachim Niehren,et al.  The Constraint Language for Lambda Structures , 2001, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[5]  Irit,et al.  Commitments , Beliefs and Intentions in Dialogue , 2008 .

[6]  Tim Fernando,et al.  Bisimulations and predicate logic , 1994, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[7]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[8]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Agreement and Disputes in Dialogue , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[9]  A. Lascarides,et al.  The Interpretation of Questions in Dialogue , 2009 .

[10]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From Discourse to Logic - Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[11]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[12]  Wolfgang Wahlster,et al.  Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation , 2000, Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning , 2002 .

[14]  J.A.G. Groenendijk.  Questions and answers: Semantics and logic , 2003 .

[15]  Dominique Longin,et al.  Grounding and the Expression of Belief , 2006, KR.

[16]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[17]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[18]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[19]  H. H. Clark.  Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[20]  N. V. Leusen.  The interpretation of corrections , 1994 .

[21]  David R Traum,et al.  Towards a Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversation , 1991 .

[22]  Livia Polanyi,et al.  A Theory of Discourse Structure and Discourse Coherence in Papers from the General Session at the Twenty-First Regional Meeting. , 1985 .

[23]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  David R. Traum,et al.  Modelling Grounding and Discourse Obligations Using Update Rules , 2000, ANLP.

[25]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[26]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Reference to abstract objects in discourse , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[27]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[28]  David R. Traum,et al.  Conversational Actions and Discourse Situations , 1997, Comput. Intell..

[29]  W. H. F. Barnes.  The Nature of Explanation , 1944, Nature.

[30]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Inferring Acceptance and Rejection in Dialog by Default Rules of Inference , 1996, ArXiv.