Global Government applications of analogues, SAR s and QSAR s to predict aquatic toxicity, chemical or physical properties, environmental fate parameters and health effects of organic chemicals
暂无分享,去创建一个
John D. Walker | E Hulzebos | J D Walker | L. Carlsen | E. Hulzebos | L Carlsen | B Simon-Hettich | B. Simon-Hettich
[1] I. Gerner,et al. Local Irritation/Corrosion Testing Strategies: Extending a Decision Support System by Applying Self-Learning Classifiers , 2000, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[2] John D. Walker,et al. Structure Activity Relationships For Predicting Ecological Effects Of Chemicals , 2002 .
[3] C. Auer,et al. SAR—The U.S. Regulatory Perspective , 1994 .
[4] D G Hoel,et al. Predictive strategies for selecting 379 NCI/NTP chemicals evaluated for carcinogenic potential: scientific and public health impact. , 1993, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[5] P. Wagner,et al. The new chemicals process at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): structure-activity relationships for hazard identification and risk assessment. , 1995, Toxicology letters.
[6] M. Zeeman,et al. Ecological Hazard Evaluation and Risk Assessment Under EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): An Introduction , 1993 .
[7] Jd Walker. The TSCA Interagency Testing Committee, 1977 to 1992: Creation, Structure, Functions and Contributions , 1993 .
[8] J V Nabholz,et al. Environmental hazard and risk assessment under the United States Toxic Substances Control Act. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.
[9] Svante Wold,et al. A strategy for ranking environmentally occurring chemicals: Part II. An illustration with two data sets of chlorinated aliphatics and aliphatic alcohols , 1989 .
[10] J. Contrera,et al. A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[11] I Gerner,et al. Development of a Decision Support System for the Introduction of Alternative Methods into Local Irritancy/Corrosivity Testing Strategies. Creation of Fundamental Rules for a Decision Support System , 2000, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[12] M Zeeman,et al. Environmental Risk Assessment of New Chemicals Under the Toxic Substances Control Act TSCA Section Five , 1993 .
[13] R D Benz,et al. Use of toxicological information in drug design. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[14] J V Nabholz,et al. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations. , 1995, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[15] J. Nabholz,et al. The Use and Application of QSARs in the Office of Toxic Substances for Ecological Hazard Assessment of New Chemicals , 1993 .
[16] J. Huff,et al. Predictive Strategies for Selecting 379 NCI/NTP Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential: Scientific and Public Health Impact , 1993 .
[17] Moiz M Mumtaz,et al. Applications of computational toxicology methods at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. , 2002, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.
[18] Svante Wold,et al. A strategy for ranking environmentally occurring chemicals , 1989 .
[19] W Karcher,et al. Assessment of QSARS for Predicting Fate and Effects of Chemicals in the Environment: An International European Project. , 1995, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[20] Wayne A. Morrissey. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) , 2002 .
[21] L. Walker,et al. The importance of the gut and its contents in prey as a source of cadmium to predators , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.
[22] John D. Walker,et al. New Cost-Effective, Computerized Approachesto Selecting Chemicals for Priority Testing Consideration , 1988 .
[23] F. Lindgren,et al. Fast screening of large databases using clustering and PCA based on structure fragments , 1996 .
[24] A W Lange,et al. Experiences with the application of QSAR in the routine of the notification procedure. , 1995, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[25] J V Nabholz,et al. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5. , 1990, Environmental health perspectives.
[26] J. Nabholz,et al. Validation of Structure Activity Relationships Used by the USEPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics for the Environmental Hazard Assessment of Industrial Chemicals , 1993 .
[27] Svante Wold,et al. A strategy for ranking environmentally occurring chemicals. Part III: Multivariate quantitative structure‐activity relationships for halogenated aliphatics , 1990 .
[28] J D Walker. Chemical selection by the Interagency Testing Committee: use of computerized substructure searching to identify chemical groups for health effects, chemical fate and ecological effects testing. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.
[29] Fredrik Lindgren,et al. QSARs based on statistical design and their use for identifying chemicals for further biological testing , 1990 .
[30] Werner Klein,et al. Priority setting of existing chemicals , 1988 .
[31] D MacDonald,et al. Uses and limitations of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) to categorize substances on the Canadian domestic substance list as persistent and/or bioaccumulative, and inherently toxic to non-human organisms , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.