Realization of Open Software Chain for 3D Modeling and Printing of Organs in Simulation Centers: Example of Renal Pelvis Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE Three-dimensional (3D) printing has many uses in healthcare such as in surgical training. It is becoming an interesting tool finding new pedagogical purposes in medical simulation. In this study, using a process consisting of 3D modeling, a simulator dedicated to pyeloplasty was designed, manufactured, and evaluated by experts. DESIGN With the aid of open-source software and computer-aided design software, 3D models of a renal parenchyma, a renal pelvis and a ureter were created. This renal apparatus was processed and crafted with additive manufacturing using soft polymer materials. Polyvinyl alcohol material was used to print the components in order to make them dissectible and to evaluate their use in surgical teaching. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Seven expert surgeons evaluated the model by performing a pyeloplasty sequence established in a previous work. An evaluation grid with 8 items related to surgical movement was rated on a 5-point Likert scale to assess how similar working with the model was to actual surgery. RESULTS Three items were rated with a score greater than or equal to 4 (Needle penetration, Thread-sliding, and Cutting Strength). Suture strength was rated with a score above 3.5 for both renal pelvis and ureter, whereas elasticity was rated below 3. Handling and mobility properties were rated above 3 for the renal pelvis and below 3 for the ureter. The cost of the unit was $0.30 per renal unit. The primary difference identified was a difference in elongation between polyvinyl alcohol material and real biological tissue. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to generate and print a low cost upper urinary tract model from patient data imagery using environmentally friendly products that can be used effectively in surgical training. The simulator has been able to reproduce sensations related to surgical movements for a low cost. Hereafter, research into the pedagogical benefits provided to students, and through them, patients, should be performed. 3D printing models can offer new opportunities for healthcare simulation specific to different surgical fields.

[1]  Lars Konge,et al.  Surgical simulation: Current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training , 2018, Medical teacher.

[2]  Rosaire Mongrain,et al.  3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future , 2017, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[3]  H. Abdoul,et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: long-term outcome and critical analysis of 10-year experience in a teaching center. , 2013, European urology.

[4]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery , 2016, Nature Reviews Urology.

[5]  Karen E. Burtt,et al.  Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[6]  Julien Rod,et al.  Low-Cost Training Simulator for Open Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Development and Face Validation. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[7]  Juhee Jang,et al.  Cylindrical relative humidity sensor based on poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) for wearable computing devices with enhanced sensitivity , 2017 .

[8]  F. Coyer,et al.  Kirkpatrick's Evaluation of Simulation and Debriefing in Health Care Education: A Systematic Review. , 2018, The Journal of nursing education.

[9]  Efthymios Maneas,et al.  From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  Daniel K. Sodickson,et al.  3D printed renal cancer models derived from MRI data: application in pre-surgical planning , 2017, Abdominal Radiology.

[11]  Nanna Jo Borgersen,et al.  Gathering Validity Evidence for Surgical Simulation: A Systematic Review , 2018, Annals of surgery.

[12]  Richard M. Satava,et al.  The Future of Surgical Simulation , 2019, Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Surgery and Surgical Subspecialties.

[13]  François Sainfort,et al.  Validity and acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[14]  Thomas Looi,et al.  Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[15]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels , 2009 .

[16]  R. Reznick,et al.  Training and simulation for patient safety , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[17]  Naoki Hirabayashi,et al.  Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room , 2012, Surgery Today.

[18]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Engagement and learning in simulation: recommendations of the Simnovate Engaged Learning Domain Group , 2017, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[19]  Hojin Ha,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing: Basic Principles and Applications in Medicine and Radiology , 2016, Korean journal of radiology.

[20]  Qian Yan,et al.  A Review of 3D Printing Technology for Medical Applications , 2018, Engineering.

[21]  FABIAN ADAMS,et al.  Soft 3D-Printed Phantom of the Human Kidney with Collecting System , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Justin W. Adams,et al.  The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[23]  Lucian Panait,et al.  The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[24]  Amitai Ziv,et al.  Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[25]  Amy E. Alexander,et al.  Impact of a 3D printed model on patients’ understanding of renal cryoablation: a prospective pilot study , 2018, Abdominal Radiology.

[26]  N. Saber,et al.  Application of 3D Printing in Medical Simulation and Education , 2016 .

[27]  Michelle Quayle,et al.  Challenges in creating dissectible anatomical 3D prints for surgical teaching , 2019, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  Patrick Dubois,et al.  In vivo measurement of surgical gestures , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Norberto F. Ezquerra,et al.  Interactively deformable models for surgery simulation , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[30]  Raju Thomas,et al.  3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study , 2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[31]  David A Cook,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Simulation to Assess Health Professionals: A Systematic Review of Validity Evidence, Research Methods, and Reporting Quality , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[32]  GolabAdam,et al.  Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Supported by Training Involving Personalized Silicone Replica Poured in Three-Dimensional Printed Casting Mold , 2017 .

[33]  Patricia Youngblood,et al.  Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  E. Toyserkani,et al.  Additive manufacturing of silicone structures: A review and prospective , 2018, Additive Manufacturing.