Correlation dimension: a pivotal statistic for non-constrained realizations of composite hypotheses in surrogate data analysis

Abstract Currently surrogate data analysis can be used to determine if data is consistent with various linear systems, or something else (a nonlinear system). In this paper we propose an extension of these methods in an attempt to make more specific classifications within the class of nonlinear systems. In the method of surrogate data one estimates the probability distribution of values of a test statistic for a set of experimental data under the assumption that the data is consistent with a given hypothesis. If the probability distribution of the test statistic is different for different dynamical systems consistent with the hypothesis, one must ensure that the surrogate generation technique generates surrogate data that are a good approximation to the data. This is often achieved with a careful choice of surrogate generation method and for noise driven linear surrogates such methods are commonly used. This paper argues that, in many cases (particularly for nonlinear hypotheses), it is easier to select a test statistic for which the probability distribution of test statistic values is the same for all systems consistent with the hypothesis. For most linear hypotheses one can use a reliable estimator of a dynamic invariant of the underlying class of processes. For more complex, nonlinear hypothesis it requires suitable restatement (or cautious statement) of the hypothesis. Using such statistics one can build nonlinear models of the data and apply the methods of surrogate data to determine if the data is consistent with a simulation from a broad class of models. These ideas are illustrated with estimates of probability distribution functions for correlation dimension estimates of experimental and artificial data, and linear and nonlinear hypotheses.

[1]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[2]  Michael Small,et al.  Detecting Nonlinearity in Experimental Data , 1998 .

[3]  K. Judd Estimating dimension from small samples , 1994 .

[4]  Floris Takens,et al.  DETECTING NONLINEARITIES IN STATIONARY TIME SERIES , 1993 .

[5]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[6]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[7]  Andreas Galka,et al.  Estimating the dimension of high-dimensional attractors: a comparison between two algorithms , 1998 .

[8]  James Theiler,et al.  On the evidence for how-dimensional chaos in an epileptic electroencephalogram , 1995 .

[9]  G F Inbar,et al.  Strength and cycle time of high-altitude ventilatory patterns in unacclimatized humans. , 1984, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[10]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  James Theiler,et al.  Constrained-realization Monte-carlo Method for Hypothesis Testing , 1996 .

[12]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[13]  K. Judd An improved estimator of dimension and some comments on providing confidence intervals , 1992 .

[14]  A. Mees,et al.  On selecting models for nonlinear time series , 1995 .

[15]  Michael Small,et al.  Comparisons of new nonlinear modeling techniques with applications to infant respiration , 1998 .

[16]  M Small,et al.  Is breathing in infants chaotic? Dimension estimates for respiratory patterns during quiet sleep. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  M. B. Priestley,et al.  Non-linear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1990 .

[18]  P. Rapp,et al.  Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.