Sharing by Design: Understanding and Supporting Personal Health Information Sharing and Collaboration within Social Networks.

Sharing by Design: Understanding and supporting personal health information sharing and collaboration within social networks Meredith McLain Skeels Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Wanda Pratt Medical Education and Biomedical Informatics Friends, family, and community provide important support and help to patients who face an illness. Unfortunately, keeping a social network informed about a patient's health status and needs takes effort, making it difficult for people who are sick and exhausted from illness. Members of a patient's social network are often eager to help, but can be unsure of what to do; they must balance their desire to help with trying not to bother a sick friend. In this dissertation, I describe research on how people share health information within their existing social networks and present technology to create informed, helpful networks. I used a mixed methods approach of interviews and an online questionnaire to provide a detailed analysis of what health information people share, who they share with, mode of transmission, and why people share personal health information. My research culminates in the design of new technology that enables patients to create an informed network and catalyzes helping activities within that network. I used participatory design methods with breast cancer patients and survivors to ensure that the design is based on a firm understanding of users' goals, priorities, constraints, and current sharing practices. Together, we designed a technology that allows a patient to keep their social network up to date, solicit help from their network, field offers of help, and collaborate through discussions. The design is motivated by the insight that a more informed social network is better able to provide needed help and support. Advocating that patient-centered technology should allow users to share personal health information with others comes with the responsibility to contribute to the effort to create usable privacy interfaces. I present a method for evaluating the transparency of privacy controls and use this method to identify a transparent icon that can be embedded within interfaces to show how information is being shared. Embracing the complex picture of how patients manage and share personal health information with others will ultimately improve the technology available to support patients. I contribute a better understanding of current sharing practices and technology to enable patients to create informed, helpful social networks. ©Copyright 2010 Meredith McLain Skeels University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a doctoral dissertation by Meredith McLain Skeels and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Chair of the Supervisory Committee:

[1]  P. Wiederholt,et al.  The Patient: Our Teacher and Friend 1 , 1997 .

[2]  Xiang Cao,et al.  Intentional access management: making access control usable for end-users , 2006, SOUPS '06.

[3]  David W. Bates,et al.  A Consensus Action Agenda for Achieving the National Health Information Infrastructure , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

[4]  Diana K. Smetters,et al.  How users use access control , 2009, SOUPS.

[5]  K C Carriere,et al.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. , 1997, JAMA.

[6]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  If you need help, just ask: underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Anne Moen,et al.  Model Formulation: Health@HomeThe Work of Health Information Management in the Household (HIMH): Implications for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) Innovations , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[9]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Design in groups—and all that jazz , 1997 .

[10]  J. Hornaday,et al.  Cancer Facts & Figures 2004 , 2004 .

[11]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems , 1999, CHI '99.

[13]  Kenji Takahashi,et al.  Soramame: what you see is what you control access control user interface , 2009, CHIMIT.

[14]  Lujo Bauer,et al.  Expandable grids for visualizing and authoring computer security policies , 2008, CHI.

[15]  C. B. Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer , 2003, Cancer.

[16]  David R. Millen,et al.  Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook , 2007, GROUP.

[17]  Sharon L. Manne,et al.  Coping and Social Support , 2003 .

[18]  Clare-Marie Karat,et al.  Usable privacy and security for personal information management , 2006, CACM.

[19]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Janet Davis Design methods for ethical persuasive computing , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[21]  T. Mulvey A closer look , 2007, Nature.

[22]  Diana K. Smetters,et al.  In search of usable security: five lessons from the field , 2004, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.

[23]  M. Mills,et al.  The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[24]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[25]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Online Communication and Support for Cancer Patients: A Relationship-centric Design Framework , 2005, AMIA.

[26]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Flowers or a robot army?: encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays , 2008, UbiComp.

[27]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  A Scandinavian challenge, a US response: methodological assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches , 2002, SIGDOC '02.

[28]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  White Paper: Toward an Informatics Research Agenda: Key People and Organizational Issues , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[29]  Toomas Timpka,et al.  Research Paper: Participatory Design of Information Systems in Health Care , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Personal health information management , 2006, CACM.

[31]  Jorge Lobo,et al.  Usability meets access control: challenges and research opportunities , 2009, SACMAT '09.

[32]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Computers and Design in Context , 2003 .

[33]  C E Rees,et al.  The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[34]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  A. Farmer,et al.  Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication , 2009, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[36]  Clare-Marie Karat,et al.  Usable security and privacy: a case study of developing privacy management tools , 2005, SOUPS '05.

[37]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[38]  Mike Wu,et al.  Participatory design of an orientation aid for amnesics , 2005, CHI.

[39]  Sato Ashida,et al.  Changes in female support network systems and adaptation after breast cancer diagnosis: differences between older and younger patients. , 2009, The Gerontologist.

[40]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Collective Information Practice: Exploring Privacy and Security as Social and Cultural Phenomena , 2006, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life , 2008, CHI.

[42]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Use and reuse of shared lists as a social content type , 2008, CHI.

[43]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[44]  Werner Geyer,et al.  People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[45]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychosocial Needs of Women with Breast Cancer , 2004 .

[46]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  A study of preferences for sharing and privacy , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[47]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Patients as actors: The patient's role in detecting, preventing, and recovering from medical errors , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[48]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[49]  Jonathan P. Allen Controversies about privacy and open information in CSCW: a panel report from the CSCW'92 conference , 1993, SIGO.

[50]  Mike Wu,et al.  Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia , 2004, PDC 04.

[51]  Ninghui Li,et al.  End-User Privacy in Human–Computer Interaction , 2009 .

[52]  Lujo Bauer,et al.  A user study of policy creation in a flexible access-control system , 2008, CHI.

[53]  Mika Raento,et al.  Privacy management for social awareness applications , 2005 .

[54]  Masood Masoodian,et al.  Sharing, privacy and trust issues for photo collections , 2007 .

[55]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Threading Together Patient Expertise , 2007, AMIA.

[56]  J. P. Kichak,et al.  Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful? , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[57]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations , 1990 .

[58]  Jeana Frost,et al.  How the Social Web Supports Patient Experimentation with a New Therapy: The demand for patient-controlled and patient-centered informatics , 2008, AMIA.

[59]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[60]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design: the third space in HCI , 2002 .

[61]  Allison Druin,et al.  Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility , 2006, TCHI.

[62]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[63]  H. Winefield,et al.  Support provision and emotional work in an Internet support group for cancer patients. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[64]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Investigating Ownership and the Willingness to Share Information Online , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Universal product design involving elderly users: a participatory design model. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[66]  Lee,et al.  When the Going Gets Tough, Do the Tough Ask for Help? Help Seeking and Power Motivation in Organizations. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[67]  D. Boyd Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[68]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  Self‐reported use of shared decision‐making among breast cancer specialists and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing this approach , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[69]  ETA S. BERNER,et al.  Review Paper: Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[70]  Eric W. Ford,et al.  Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[71]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene , 1995 .

[72]  Cora Hinds,et al.  Functions and preferred methods of receiving information related to radiotherapy: Perceptions of patients with cancer , 1995, Cancer nursing.

[73]  Alan R. Heminger,et al.  Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[74]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Participatory design in Britain and North America: responses to the “Scandinavian Challenge” , 1991, CHI '91.