Comparing the Performance of Neural Networks for Predicting Peak Outflow from Breached Embankments when Back Propagation Algorithms Meet Evolutionary Algorithms

This investigation provides a review of some methods for estimation of peak outflow fro m breached dams and presents an effective and efficient model for predicting peak outflow based on artificial neural network (ANN). For this reason the case study data on peak outflow discharge were co mpiled fro m various sources and reanalyzed using the ANN technique to see if better predictions are possible. By employing two important effective parameters namely, height (Hw) and volume (Vw) of water behind the dam at failure, four scenarios were addressed. To train the models two different algorith ms were examined namely, back propagation (BP) and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA). A mong the BP algorithms, Levenberg-Marquardt (LM ), resilient back propagation (RP), fletcher-reeves update (CGF), and scaled conjugate gradient (SCG) were ut ilized. Therefore, 20 different ANN models were developed and compared to each other. Results showed that both Hw and Vw parameters are similarly do minant in estimating the peak outflow d ischarge. Among the different training functions, LM was the best, because of higher coefficient of determination (R 2 =0.87) and lower error (RM SE=9616). Co mparing the results of ANN and empirical formu las indicated higher ANN performance, so such formulas are better to be replaced with superior ANN model.

[1]  Nicolas Gagarin,et al.  Estimating Pier Scour with Artificial Neural Networks , 1993 .

[2]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization Training Algorithm for ANNs in Stage Prediction of Shing Mun River , 2006 .

[3]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[4]  Caro Lucas,et al.  Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition , 2007, 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Rodney Day,et al.  Prediction of scour depth at culvert outlets using neural networks , 2001 .

[6]  Maryam Abbasi,et al.  Results uncertainty of solid waste generation forecasting by hybrid of wavelet transform-ANFIS and wavelet transform-neural network , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Steven R. Abt,et al.  Predicting Peak Outflow from Breached Embankment Dams , 2010 .

[8]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  FEED FORWARD NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS , 1989 .

[9]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[10]  V. Singh,et al.  Analysis of Gradual Earth‐Dam Failure , 1988 .

[11]  Hamid Mehdizadeh,et al.  A framework development for predicting the longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using an artificial neural network , 2011 .

[12]  C. Charalambous,et al.  Conjugate gradient algorithm for efficient training of artifi-cial neural networks , 1990 .

[13]  G. W. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluation guidelines for spillway adequacy , 1977 .

[14]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction , 1999 .

[15]  D. Jeng,et al.  Estimation of pile group scour using adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach , 2007 .

[16]  Hazi Mohammad Azamathulla,et al.  ANFIS-Based Approach for Predicting the Scour Depth at Culvert Outlets , 2011 .

[17]  P. B. Deolalikar,et al.  Neural Networks for Estimation of Scour Downstream of a Ski-Jump Bucket , 2005 .

[18]  Árni Snorrason,et al.  Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models , 1984 .

[19]  Roohollah Noori,et al.  Evaluation of PCA and Gamma test techniques on ANN operation for weekly solid waste prediction. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Waldemar Rebizant,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks , 2011 .

[21]  Stephen G. Evans,et al.  The maximum discharge of outburst floods caused by the breaching of man-made and natural dams , 1986 .

[22]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[23]  Homer B. Willis The evaluation of dam safety : Engineering Foundation Conference proceedings, Asilomar conference grounds, Pacific Grove, California, November 28-December 3, 1976 , 1977 .

[24]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimal field-scale groundwater remediation using neural networks and the genetic algorithm. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  SEDIMENT LOADS PREDICTION USING MULTILAYER FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS , 2006 .

[26]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Peak Outflow from Breached Embankment Dam , 1989 .

[27]  Saeed-Reza Sabbagh-Yazdi,et al.  Estimation of current-induced scour depth around pile groups using neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[28]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[29]  Hubert Chanson Overtopping Breaching of Noncohesive Homogeneous Embankments , 2004 .

[30]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Embankment Dam Breach Parameters Revisited , 1995 .

[31]  Marco Pilotti,et al.  Simplified Method for the Characterization of the Hydrograph following a Sudden Partial Dam Break , 2010 .

[32]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[33]  Thomas C. MacDonald,et al.  Breaching Charateristics of Dam Failures , 1984 .

[34]  N. J. Ferreira,et al.  Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to the São Paulo region , 2005 .

[35]  Caro Lucas,et al.  Colonial competitive algorithm: A novel approach for PID controller design in MIMO distillation column process , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern..

[36]  J. E. Costa Floods from dam failures , 1985 .

[37]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Breaching Parameters for Earth and Rockfill Dams , 2009 .

[38]  Brent Mefford,et al.  Prediction of Embankment Dam Breach Parameters , 1998 .