Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation

A series of four experiments was conducted to determine whether English-learning infants can use allophonic cues to word boundaries to segment words from fluent speech. Infants were familiarized with a pair of two-syllable items, such asnitrates andnight rates and then were tested on their ability to detect these same words in fluent speech passages. The presence of allophonic cues to word bound-aries did not help 9-month-olds to distinguish one of the familiarized words from an acoustically similar foil. Infants familiarized withnitrates were just as likely to listen to a passage aboutnight rates as they were to listen to one aboutnitrates. Nevertheless, when the passages contained distributional cues that favored the extraction of the familiarized targets, 9-month-olds were able to segment these items from fluent speech. By the age of 10.5 months, infants were able to rely solely on allophonic cues to locate the familiarized target words in passages. We consider what implications these findings have for understanding how word segmentation skills develop.

[1]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[3]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[4]  Ilse Lehiste,et al.  An Acoustic – Phonetic Study of Internal Open Juncture , 1959 .

[5]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[6]  P. Jusczyk The discovery of spoken language , 1997 .

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[8]  A. Woodward,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Kari Suomi,et al.  An outline of a developmental model of adult phonological organization and behavior , 1993 .

[11]  Catharine H. Echols,et al.  The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. , 1997 .

[12]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[13]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Disjuncture as a Cue to Constructs , 1957 .

[14]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception , 1995 .

[15]  Kenneth Ward Church Phonological parsing in speech recognition , 1987 .

[16]  C. Coker,et al.  Allophonic variation in American English , 1974 .

[17]  D. Klatt Review of selected models of speech perception , 1989 .

[18]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation , 1991 .

[19]  D.R. Reddy,et al.  Speech recognition by machine: A review , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[21]  Alex Waibel,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Suprasegmentals in Very Large Vocabulary Word Recognition* , 1986 .

[22]  J R Saffran,et al.  Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. , 1995, Child development.

[23]  J. Reznick,et al.  Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  C. F. Hockett A Course in Modern Linguistics , 1959 .

[25]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[26]  Peter W. Jusczyk,et al.  Investigations of the word segmentation abilities of infants , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[27]  A. Cutler Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour , 1976 .

[28]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[29]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  M. Brent,et al.  On the discovery of novel wordlike units from utterances: an artificial-language study with implications for native-language acquisition. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to allophonic differences , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval , 1987, Cognition.

[33]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[34]  Stephen E. Levinson,et al.  Speech Recognition by Computer. , 1981 .

[35]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  C. Mills,et al.  Effects of the match between listener expectancies and coarticulatory cues on the perception of speech. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[38]  Michael R. Brent,et al.  Toward a Unified Model of Lexical Acquisition and Lexical Access , 1997 .

[39]  R. Cole,et al.  How are syllables used to recognize words? , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.