The GFZ GRACE RL06 Monthly Gravity Field Time Series: Processing Details and Quality Assessment

Time-variable gravity field models derived from observations of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, whose science operations phase ended in June 2017 after more than 15 years, enabled a multitude of studies of Earth’s surface mass transport processes and climate change. The German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), routinely processing such monthly gravity fields as part of the GRACE Science Data System, has reprocessed the complete GRACE mission and released an improved GFZ GRACE RL06 monthly gravity field time series. This study provides an insight into the processing strategy of GFZ RL06 which has been considerably changed with respect to previous GFZ GRACE releases, and modifications relative to the precursor GFZ RL05a are described. The quality of the RL06 gravity field models is analyzed and discussed both in the spectral and spatial domain in comparison to the RL05a time series. All results indicate significant improvements of about 40% in terms of reduced noise. It is also shown that the GFZ RL06 time series is a step forward in terms of consistency, and that errors of the gravity field coefficients are more realistic. These findings are confirmed as well by independent validation of the monthly GRACE models, as done in this work by means of ocean bottom pressure in situ observations and orbit tests with the GOCE satellite. Thus, the GFZ GRACE RL06 time series allows for a better quantification of mass changes in the Earth system.

[1]  Beate Klinger,et al.  ITSG‐Grace2018: Overview and Evaluation of a New GRACE‐Only Gravity Field Time Series , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[2]  Himanshu Save,et al.  GRACE accelerometer data transplant , 2019, Advances in Space Research.

[3]  Olivier Francis,et al.  An Optimized Short‐Arc Approach: Methodology and Application to Develop Refined Time Series of Tongji‐Grace2018 GRACE Monthly Solutions , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[4]  Bert Wouters,et al.  Global Glacier Mass Loss During the GRACE Satellite Mission (2002-2016) , 2019, Front. Earth Sci..

[5]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  GRACE-FO: The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On Mission , 2019, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets.

[6]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[7]  A. Jäggi,et al.  The satellite-only gravity field model GOCO06s , 2019 .

[8]  R. Ray,et al.  Tests of ocean-tide models by analysis of satellite-to-satellite range measurements: An update. , 2019, Geophysical journal international.

[9]  Felix W. Landerer,et al.  Sea-level fingerprints emergent from GRACE mission data , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[10]  Florian Seitz,et al.  Mass-related excitation of polar motion: an assessment of the new RL06 GRACE gravity field models , 2018, Earth, Planets and Space.

[11]  L. Zhang,et al.  Time Variations in Ocean Bottom Pressure from a Few Hours to Many Years: In Situ Data, Numerical Models, and GRACE Satellite Gravimetry , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[12]  F. Landerer,et al.  Emerging trends in global freshwater availability , 2018, Nature.

[13]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Satellite laser ranging to low Earth orbiters: orbit and network validation , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[14]  Daniel Koenig,et al.  A Terrestrial Reference Frame realised on the observation level using a GPS-LEO satellite constellation , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[15]  R. König,et al.  A new high-resolution model of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean mass variability for de-aliasing of satellite gravity observations: AOD1B RL06 , 2017 .

[16]  John C. Ries,et al.  The unexpected signal in GRACE estimates of $$C_{20}$$C20 , 2017 .

[17]  Beate Klinger,et al.  The role of accelerometer data calibration within GRACE gravity field recovery: Results from ITSG-Grace2016 , 2016 .

[18]  Anne Springer,et al.  Mapping probabilities of extreme continental water storage changes from space gravimetry , 2016 .

[19]  A. Jäggi,et al.  AIUB-RL02: an improved time-series of monthly gravity fields from GRACE data , 2016 .

[20]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  What Can be Expected from the GRACE-FO Laser Ranging Interferometer for Earth Science Applications? , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[21]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  A decade of sea level rise slowed by climate-driven hydrology , 2016, Science.

[22]  F. Landerer,et al.  Atlantic meridional overturning circulation variations from GRACE ocean bottom pressure anomalies , 2016 .

[23]  J. Kusche,et al.  Revisiting the contemporary sea-level budget on global and regional scales , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  The pole tide and its effect on GRACE time‐variable gravity measurements: Implications for estimates of surface mass variations , 2015 .

[25]  H. Bock,et al.  GOCE: precise orbit determination for the entire mission , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[26]  Henryk Dobslaw,et al.  Global Eustatic Sea-Level Variations for the Approximation of Geocenter Motion from Grace , 2014 .

[27]  I. Sasgen,et al.  Antarctic ice-mass balance 2003 to 2012: regional reanalysis of GRACE satellite gravimetry measurements with improved estimate of glacial-isostatic adjustment based on GPS uplift rates , 2013 .

[28]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Simulating high‐frequency atmosphere‐ocean mass variability for dealiasing of satellite gravity observations: AOD1B RL05 , 2013 .

[29]  J. Wahr,et al.  Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada , 2012 .

[30]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Calibration and validation of individual GOCE accelerometers by precise orbit determination , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[31]  F. Sansò,et al.  First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches , 2011 .

[32]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Validation of GOCE gravity field models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons , 2011 .

[33]  J. Kusche,et al.  Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model , 2009 .

[34]  Yoke T. Yoon,et al.  Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites , 2009 .

[35]  Jens Schröter,et al.  A pattern‐filtering method for the determination of ocean bottom pressure anomalies from GRACE solutions , 2008 .

[36]  Shailen D. Desai,et al.  Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry , 2002 .

[37]  K. Neumayer,et al.  GRACE-FO D-103919 (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On): GFZ Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Level-2 Product Release 06 (Rev. 1.0, June 3, 2019) , 2019 .

[38]  K. Neumayer,et al.  GRACE 327-743 (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) : GFZ Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Level-2 Product Release 06 (Rev. 1.0, October 26, 2018) , 2018 .

[39]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  GFZ RL05: An Improved Time-Series of Monthly GRACE Gravity Field Solutions , 2014 .

[40]  Olaf Boebel,et al.  Validation of GRACE Gravity Fields by In-Situ Data of Ocean Bottom Pressure , 2010 .

[41]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  A new combined global gravity field model including GOCE data from the collaboration of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse , 2010 .

[42]  W. Bosch,et al.  EOT11A - Empirical Ocean Tide Model from Multi-Mission Satellite Altimetry , 2008 .

[43]  Roland Schmidt,et al.  Zur Bestimmung des cm-Geoids und dessen zeitlicher Variationen mit GRACE , 2007 .

[44]  R. Haagmans,et al.  The GOCE gravity mission: ESA's first core explorer , 2007 .

[45]  R. Biancale,et al.  Mean annual and seasonal atmospheric tide models based on 3-hourly and 6-hourly ECMWF surface pressure data , 2006 .

[46]  C. Reigber,et al.  Gravity field recovery from satellite tracking data , 1989 .