Control schemes which are available for the operation of canal networks for irrigation projects are examined. These control schemes include upstream control, downstream control, controlled volume control, dynamic regulation, and flow rate control. The latter method is emphasized in particular because of its usefulness in managing water. The type of control and type of structure needed at each canal bifurcation should be carefully examined and matched with the type of delivery scheme and operational constraints. The result may be that different control schemes and devices may be used in different areas of the same project. Demand deliveries are generally not feasible for most large projects, unless the project is broken down into independently controlled subunits. Arranged schedules with upstream control are currently more common. An alternative is to use constant‐flow‐rate control at the head of lateral canals with upstream control within the lateral. Deliveries are then arranged within the lateral unit w...
[1]
John L. Merriam,et al.
Demand Irrigation Schedule Pilot Project: Sri Lanka
,
1986
.
[2]
A. R. Dedrick.
Control Requirements and Field Experience with Mechanized Level Basins
,
1986
.
[3]
O. S. Balogun,et al.
Automatic control of canal flow using linear quadratic regulator theory
,
1988
.
[4]
Albert J. Clemmens,et al.
Mechanical-Hydraulic Dual-Acting Controller for Canal Level or Discharge Rate
,
1987
.
[5]
David D. Bedworth,et al.
Computer Control for Irrigation-Canal System
,
1983
.
[6]
Albert J. Clemmens,et al.
Flow measuring flumes for open channel systems
,
1984
.
[7]
Albert J. Clemmens,et al.
Irrigation Water Delivery Performance
,
1984
.
[8]
Albert J. Clemmens,et al.
Automatic regulation of canal offtakes
,
1987
.
[9]
Darell D. Zimbelman,et al.
Planning, operation, rehabilitation, and automation of irrigation water delivery systems : proceedings of a symposium
,
1987
.