Accommodation as a function of age and the linearity of the response dynamics

The changes with age in the accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli can reveal useful information on the factors underlying presbyopia development. Analysis of the monocular accommodation responses of 19 normal observers (ages 18-49 years) to stimuli whose vergence varied sinusoidally with time at different temporal frequencies (peak-to-peak stimulus 1.33-2.38 D, at 0.05-1.00 Hz) showed that at all ages both the gain and phase of the response were essentially linear functions of the temporal frequency. Extrapolation of least-squares, regression line fits to the gain data for each subject gave the gain at zero frequency, G0, and the cut-off frequency, fc, at which the gain fell to zero. G0 reduced with age but fc remained essentially constant at about 1.7 Hz, up to at least the age of about 40. The magnitude of the response to step stimuli covering the same stimulus range was well correlated with the value of G0. The linear changes in phase lag with temporal frequency corresponded to simple time delays td. The time lag varied from close to zero for the youngest subjects to about 0.5 s for the subjects in their late forties. There was substantial variation between the responses of subjects of similar age: those subjects with high values of G0 also tended to have low values of td, both effects probably being due to the superior ability of some individuals to predict the sinusoidal changes in the accommodation stimulus. Comparison of theoretical step responses, derived by applying linear theory to the parameters obtained from the results for the sinusoidal stimuli, with the actual responses to unpredictable steps for the same subjects supports the view that prediction effects and other possible factors make linear theory inapplicable to this type of data. The results are discussed in the context of current ideas on the development of presbyopia: it is suggested that the constancy of fc with age is the result of the ciliary body maintaining its efficiency, whereas the fall in G0 and increase in td result from increases in lens rigidity.

[1]  M. Campbell,et al.  Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  C. Schor,et al.  The fluctuations of accommodation and ageing. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[3]  B Winn,et al.  Binocular accommodation reaction and response times for normal observers , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys , 2002, Vision Research.

[5]  W N Charman,et al.  Changes in the static accommodation response with age , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  W. N. Charman,et al.  On the linearity of accommodation dynamics , 2000, Vision Research.

[7]  Lawrence A. Stark,et al.  Neurological Control Systems: Studies in Bioengineering , 1995 .

[8]  W N Charman,et al.  Fluctuations in accommodation: a review , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  Ove Franzén,et al.  Accommodation and vergence mechanisms in the visual system , 2000 .

[10]  Bernard Gilmartin,et al.  Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Inter‐individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  W N Charman,et al.  Accommodation responses and ageing. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Significance of fluctuations of accommodation. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  C. A. Cook,et al.  Aging of the human lens: changes in lens shape upon accommodation and with accommodative loss. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  P. Kaufman,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia. , 2001, International ophthalmology clinics.

[16]  R. Fisher.  The elastic constants of the human lens , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[18]  L. Stark,et al.  Changes in Accommodation with Age: Static and Dynamic , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[19]  F. C. Donders.  Accommodation and refraction of the eye , 1979 .

[20]  W N Charman,et al.  Accommodation dynamics as a function of age , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Atchison,et al.  Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro , 2002, Vision Research.

[23]  Jane F. Koretz,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye—aging of the anterior segment , 1989, Vision Research.

[24]  F. Campbell,et al.  Correlation of accommodation between the two eyes. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  R F Fisher,et al.  The force of contraction of the human ciliary muscle during accommodation , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  G L van der Heijde,et al.  Age-Related Changes in the Accommodation Mechanism , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  Richard F. Brubaker,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 1976 .

[28]  P. Denieul,et al.  Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluctuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye , 1982, Vision Research.

[29]  Accommodation and Vergence Require Effort-to-See , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  A Glasser.  Can accommodation be surgically restored in human presbyopia? , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  M. Dubbelman,et al.  Changes in the internal structure of the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation , 2003, Vision Research.

[32]  David A. Atchison,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[33]  F. Roy,et al.  Mechanism of accommodation in primates. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[34]  J R Pugh,et al.  Modification of the Canon Auto Ref R1 for use as a continuously recording infra‐red optometer , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[35]  J R Pugh,et al.  A procedural guide to the modification of a Canon Auto Ref R‐1 for use as a continuously recording optometer , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[36]  W N Charman,et al.  Restoring accommodation to the presbyopic eye: how do we measure success? , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[37]  D. O'leary,et al.  Are there age differences in the accommodative response curve between 3 and 14 years of age? , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[38]  W N Charman,et al.  A longitudinal study of the changes in the static accommodation response , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[39]  J L Semmlow,et al.  Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  P. Kaufman,et al.  The mechanism of accommodation in primates. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[41]  B. Gilmartin,et al.  Arterial pulse modulates steady-state ocular accommodation. , 1990, Current eye research.

[42]  R F Fisher,et al.  The significance of the shape of the lens and capsular energy changes in accommodation , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  Norimichi Kitagawa,et al.  Hearing visual motion in depth , 2002, Nature.

[44]  Alexander Duane,et al.  NORMAL VALUES OF THE ACCOMMODATION AT ALL AGES , 1912 .

[45]  J R Pugh,et al.  Twin channel infrared optometer for recording binocular accommodation. , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[46]  M. Campbell,et al.  Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia , 1999, Vision Research.

[47]  S. Wu,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 2002 .

[48]  F. Okuyama,et al.  Influences of the Accommodative Stimulus and Aging on the Accommodative Microfluctuations , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[49]  J. Sivak,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Human Ciliary Muscle , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  B Gilmartin,et al.  The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[51]  R. Weale,et al.  Presbyopia - a maverick of human aging. , 1995, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[52]  C. Schor,et al.  Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age , 2001, Vision Research.

[53]  R. Weale,et al.  A BIOGRAPHY OF THE EYE , 1983 .

[54]  Kenneth J Ciuffreda,et al.  Static aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia , 2004, Vision Research.

[55]  B. Winn,et al.  Accommodative microfluctuations: a mechanism for steady-state control of accommodation , 2000 .

[56]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[57]  F. Toates,et al.  Control Theory in Biology and Experimental Psychology , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[58]  G. Swegmark.  STUDIES WITH IMPEDANCE CYCLOGRAPHY ON HUMAN OCULAR ACCOMMODATION AT DIFFERENT AGES , 1969, Acta ophthalmologica.

[59]  W. Charman,et al.  Reaction and Response Times for Accommodation , 1979, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[60]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  The Effect of Anticipation on the Transfer Function of the Human Lens System , 1974 .

[61]  BY F. W. CAMIPBELL,et al.  DYNAMICS OF ACCOMMODATION RESPONSES OF THE HUMAN EYE , 2006 .

[62]  Helmut Krueger.  Schwankungen der Akkommodation des menschlichen Auges bei mon- und binokularer Beobachtung , 2004, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie.